regressions.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, Sasha Neftin <sasha.neftin@intel.com>
Cc: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
	Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
	Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
	regressions@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [REGRESSION] e1000e probe/link detection fails since 6.2 kernel
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 12:12:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230329121232.7873ad95@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a5zwosd7.wl-tiwai@suse.de>

On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 10:48:36 +0200 Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 10:40:44 +0200,
> Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 04:39:01PM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:  
> > > Does openSUSE Tumbleweed make it easy to bisect the regression at least on
> > > “rc level”? It be great if narrow it more down, so we know it for example
> > > regressed in 6.2-rc7.
> > >   
> > 
> > Alternatively, can you do bisection using kernel sources from Linus's
> > tree (git required)?  
> 
> That'll be a last resort, if no one has idea at all :)

I had a quick look yesterday, there's only ~6 or so commits to e1000e.
Should be a fairly quick bisection, hopefully?

Adding Sasha.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-29 19:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-28 12:40 [REGRESSION] e1000e probe/link detection fails since 6.2 kernel Takashi Iwai
2023-03-28 14:39 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Paul Menzel
2023-03-28 15:16   ` Takashi Iwai
2023-03-29  8:40   ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-03-29  8:48     ` Takashi Iwai
2023-03-29 19:12       ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-03-30  6:30         ` Takashi Iwai
2023-03-30 10:35           ` Takashi Iwai
2023-04-02  7:38             ` Neftin, Sasha
2023-03-29  8:43 ` Bagas Sanjaya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230329121232.7873ad95@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sasha.neftin@intel.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).