From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Regressions <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
Linux Wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Anjaneyulu <pagadala.yesu.anjaneyulu@intel.com>,
"Gregory Greenman" <gregory.greenman@intel.com>,
"Johannes Berg" <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
"Niklāvs Koļesņikovs" <pinkflames.linux@gmail.com>,
"Fabio Comolli" <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
Subject: Fwd: iwlmvm: Linux 6.7 pre-rc1 prints stack trace of iwl_op_mode_mvm_start; caused by commit b6e3d1ba4fcf
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 20:13:39 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2fa930bb-54dd-4942-a88d-05a47c8e9731@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
I notice a regression report on Bugzilla [1]. Quoting from it:
> When testing the branch that will become Linux 6.7-rc1, ever since commit b6e3d1ba4fcf02176846d03a930203d8133c0aaf I have observed the following abbreviated kernel stack trace (please see attachments for the full trace):
>
> ```
> [ 6.733281] ? __warn+0xc3/0x1d0
> [ 6.733284] ? iwl_op_mode_mvm_start+0x9c4/0x9d0 [iwlmvm]
> [ 6.733299] ? report_bug+0x167/0x220
> [ 6.733301] ? handle_bug+0x3d/0x90
> [ 6.733304] ? exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x60
> [ 6.733306] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
> [ 6.733309] ? iwl_op_mode_mvm_start+0x9c4/0x9d0 [iwlmvm]
> [ 6.733325] _iwl_op_mode_start+0x66/0xe0 [iwlwifi]
> [ 6.733338] iwl_opmode_register+0x87/0xd0 [iwlwifi]
> [ 6.733350] ? __cfi_init_module+0x10/0x10 [iwlmvm]
> [ 6.733364] init_module+0x22/0xff0 [iwlmvm]
> [ 6.733378] ? __cfi_init_module+0x10/0x10 [iwlmvm]
> [ 6.733392] do_one_initcall+0x129/0x380
> [ 6.733395] ? idr_alloc_cyclic+0x148/0x1e0
> [ 6.733397] ? security_kernfs_init_security+0x41/0x80
> [ 6.733399] ? __kernfs_new_node+0x1be/0x250
> [ 6.733401] ? preempt_count_add+0x55/0xb0
> [ 6.733404] ? up_write+0x4a/0xe0
> [ 6.733406] ? preempt_count_add+0x55/0xb0
> [ 6.733408] ? sysvec_call_function+0xa4/0xb0
> [ 6.733410] ? asm_sysvec_call_function+0x1a/0x20
> [ 6.733411] ? free_unref_page_prepare+0xf3/0x410
> [ 6.733413] ? preempt_count_add+0x62/0xb0
> [ 6.733415] ? _raw_spin_trylock+0x19/0x60
> [ 6.733417] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x11/0x30
> [ 6.733419] ? __kmem_cache_free+0x29a/0x3c0
> [ 6.733421] ? vfree+0xd2/0x150
> [ 6.733422] ? slab_post_alloc_hook+0x76/0x3d0
> [ 6.733425] ? do_init_module+0x3f/0x230
> [ 6.733427] ? __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x1fe/0x2f0
> [ 6.733430] do_init_module+0x7a/0x230
> [ 6.733432] __se_sys_init_module+0x1a0/0x220
> [ 6.733435] do_syscall_64+0x7a/0x100
> [ 6.733438] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x2d/0x1d0
> [ 6.733440] ? do_syscall_64+0x89/0x100
> [ 6.733442] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x4e7/0x680
> [ 6.733444] ? exc_page_fault+0x61/0x150
> [ 6.733446] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76
> ```
>
> I did try reverting the offending commit but the result did not compile and I did not want to dig deeper to identify any subsequent commits what would need reverting to fix compilation.
>
> If it's relevant, I'm building the kernel with Clang 17.0.4 toolchain by setting the LLVM=1 variable. CFI is enabled but I'm not sure if it's actually functional.
See Bugzilla for the full thread.
Anyway, I'm adding this regression to regzbot:
#regzbot introduced: b6e3d1ba4fcf02 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218095
#regzbot title: new iwlwifi firmware statistics API triggers stack trace
Thanks.
[1]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218095
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
next reply other threads:[~2023-11-03 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-03 13:13 Bagas Sanjaya [this message]
2023-11-12 11:18 ` Fwd: iwlmvm: Linux 6.7 pre-rc1 prints stack trace of iwl_op_mode_mvm_start; caused by commit b6e3d1ba4fcf Bagas Sanjaya
2023-11-12 11:51 ` Damian Tometzki
2023-11-12 12:00 ` Damian Tometzki
2023-11-12 14:12 ` Bagas Sanjaya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2fa930bb-54dd-4942-a88d-05a47c8e9731@gmail.com \
--to=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=fabio.comolli@gmail.com \
--cc=gregory.greenman@intel.com \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pagadala.yesu.anjaneyulu@intel.com \
--cc=pinkflames.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).