From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de [80.237.130.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8875D1FBD for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 11:56:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ip4d144895.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([77.20.72.149] helo=[192.168.66.200]); authenticated by wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1nNZCy-0002tQ-Pf; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 12:56:24 +0100 Message-ID: <32ae6671-510c-9a9f-3e01-93a8f45ede7a@leemhuis.info> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 12:56:23 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: regressions@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] docs: add two texts covering regressions Content-Language: en-BS To: Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: workflows@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Randy Dunlap , regressions@lists.linux.dev, Lukas Bulwahn References: <871qzskpf8.fsf@meer.lwn.net> From: Thorsten Leemhuis In-Reply-To: <871qzskpf8.fsf@meer.lwn.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;linux@leemhuis.info;1645790188;98cac13c; X-HE-SMSGID: 1nNZCy-0002tQ-Pf On 24.02.22 20:58, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Thorsten Leemhuis writes: > >> "We don't cause regressions" might be the first rule of Linux kernel >> development, but it and other aspects of regressions nevertheless are hardly >> described in the Linux kernel's documentation. The following patches change >> this by creating two documents dedicated to the topic. >> >> The second patch could easily be folded into the first one, but was kept >> separate, as it might be a bit controversial. This also allows the patch >> description to explain some backgrounds for this part of the document. >> Additionally, ACKs and Reviewed-by tags can be collected separately this way. > > Hearing no objections, I have applied this set, thanks. Great, thx! Ciao, Thorsten