archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <>
To: Greg KH <>
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: [Bug 215117] New: ucsi_acpi: kernel NULL pointer dereference #forregzbot
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 09:37:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On 22.12.21 07:32, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 07:06:30PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker speaking.
>> For the record:
>> #regzbot fixed-by: 3f345e907a8e7c56fdebf7231cd67afc85d02aaa
>> Greg helpfully added a "Link:" tag to make regzbot happy, but he
>> specified a reply to the report and not the report itself, as expected
>> by regzbot (I'm taken back and forth for a while already if that's a
>> good or bad idea). And that was not Greg's but my fault, as I had given
>> him the wrong link here:
> Sorry about that, I tried!  :(

Many thx. And as mentioned: it was my fault :-/

> Keep up the great work,

Will do, thx for saying this, there are sometimes tough days where
things like this help. :-D

> we'll get the workflow down yet.

FWIW, regzbot in a few cases already completely worked as intended to.
But yeah, things like this always take a while to get settled.

My biggest problem is: many developers don't place the Link: tags. I
obviously expected that up to a point. But what I didn't expect: so much
opposition to place them, because quite a few developers think they are
reserved for maintainers, as they are only meant for linking to the
submission of the applied patch; a few also think others tags should be
needed for linking to bugs.

My proposed "introduce the commit message tags 'Reported:' and
'Posted:'" patch likely would have helped here, but didn't get any
traction :-/

Maybe that was partly due to the stupid mixup in the subject of the
cover letter, but whatever. So I guess I'll drop the bold idea. I
consider proposing to create "Reported: <url>" while leaving ambiguous
Link: alone, which will help my case. Note sure if I also should propose
to drop "Reported-by" at the same time, which makes things easier for
developers, as that tag can only be set after asking the reporter.

Ciao, Thorsten

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-22  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <>
2021-12-16  9:22 ` [Bug 215117] New: ucsi_acpi: kernel NULL pointer dereference Thorsten Leemhuis
2021-12-16 11:47   ` Heikki Krogerus
2021-12-21 18:06   ` [Bug 215117] New: ucsi_acpi: kernel NULL pointer dereference #forregzbot Thorsten Leemhuis
2021-12-22  6:32     ` Greg KH
2021-12-22  8:37       ` Thorsten Leemhuis [this message]
2021-12-22  9:02         ` Greg KH
2021-12-22  9:39           ` Thorsten Leemhuis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [Bug 215117] New: ucsi_acpi: kernel NULL pointer dereference #forregzbot' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).