From: "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" <regressions@leemhuis.info>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux kernel regressions list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [regression] Bug 217069 - Wake on Lan is broken on r8169 since 6.2
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 14:21:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6bba2a93-d503-3c6e-680b-c350ea8d3f88@leemhuis.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e6aaddb9-afec-e77d-be33-570f9f10a9c2@leemhuis.info>
[Quick inquiry with different recipients]
> I noticed a regression report in bugzilla.kernel.org. As many (most?)
> kernel developer don't keep an eye on it, I decided to forward it by
> mail. Quoting from https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217069 :
To Rafael and the ACPI & PM folks as well as to Bjorn and the PCI folks:
Three users reported that WOL/Wake on Lan broke for them with 6.2; two
of them have Realtek chips, one an Intel NIC. For details see the bug
linked above.
Did something in ACPI/PM/PCI land change for 6.2 that might cause
something like this? Or is such a problem even known already?
Just fishing for ideas here. If nobody has any, one of the reports will
have to bisect this.
Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-16 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-22 7:57 [regression] Bug 217069 - Wake on Lan is broken on r8169 since 6.2 Thorsten Leemhuis
2023-03-16 13:21 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) [this message]
2023-03-19 7:14 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2023-03-19 7:20 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-03-24 9:46 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2023-03-24 9:50 ` Huacai Chen
2023-03-24 10:09 ` Jianmin Lv
2023-03-25 13:31 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-03-27 7:56 ` Jianmin Lv
2023-04-14 12:48 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2023-04-16 12:35 ` Jianmin Lv
2023-04-16 12:52 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-04-17 0:54 ` Jianmin Lv
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6bba2a93-d503-3c6e-680b-c350ea8d3f88@leemhuis.info \
--to=regressions@leemhuis.info \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).