From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A534A1FB5 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 08:05:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1677139504; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1+ueFbDYI2fCK6KAGkfWDv0qOw1/uXZTIg/vtWRlPiU=; b=adB+W9iy6u6cBXv593m+9LlnTmT1xtIdBo7KvGPFbhVpCBbEI/aULbM3KSljLIijQi3iqT cHizFw9MrpR1gjj5uHs/Sr7VT8YmU+KohhCvYlBEs33kb2poyRKmLw+Cw5xNl3j7Wgp4jY rhpLvBmZXQfoA/cNA2/LXm/tHYqSvLk= Received: from mail-wm1-f70.google.com (mail-wm1-f70.google.com [209.85.128.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-594-hOAT_IWjOr-Q1o305JZO2A-1; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 03:05:03 -0500 X-MC-Unique: hOAT_IWjOr-Q1o305JZO2A-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f70.google.com with SMTP id e17-20020a05600c219100b003e21fa60ec1so4430017wme.2 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 00:05:02 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1+ueFbDYI2fCK6KAGkfWDv0qOw1/uXZTIg/vtWRlPiU=; b=bcn8/b4/cBVHhipQn9i77/V0yYkCeEDzuqN/pZqlA1TXCBuHr95RN6Y/cwrPSWZz1o RPNAVMcLvBivYxmr2Dk7ip56GZ+jxfO9aoFRf3DzMUmA2fwT1ydwD/t7VomhCN/LRpB2 GWhEnvowLXf6r1/5oKU/lbO5HtvCU1HB3NSQ93yIvZS3svLo+G8W128rhf+b80hcXYju sTJFtKUapNMM/Zyjm758F0s6ut4qT+6jmJOnK3pjXCCPKKb2nVjJGW45z98NWoo2f/NS 0T7za8EAWZBVvBVDxlX4FjaHvHK42greYR27lYhN4LXUa5YmqraU5YsukZMqZTAY0Ecc pp6w== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKV/1Iu7xjIcD853qlfrAXs4wGug9CSQYG+G+HOm98AYTihQcDIe 5supsw6yQtLnXPB6fohAWyO6HNu1cTBffBjpntw4uzlBUn8VZLZIzX6viZTihyDwxxPYqnunD7N ehPMIKurtWlfovjnWeOFjIkE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3093:b0:3dc:555c:dd30 with SMTP id g19-20020a05600c309300b003dc555cdd30mr1930920wmn.27.1677139502052; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 00:05:02 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8C2KkhdFOu+LnX9wVb8yRJ6czYkak4zwJwTlRC59nu1vtOB2+Qi4rT251F92cwGEsPeVo5bw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3093:b0:3dc:555c:dd30 with SMTP id g19-20020a05600c309300b003dc555cdd30mr1930899wmn.27.1677139501762; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 00:05:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (205.pool92-176-231.dynamic.orange.es. [92.176.231.205]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o11-20020a05600c510b00b003e1f2e43a1csm10728694wms.48.2023.02.23.00.05.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 23 Feb 2023 00:05:01 -0800 (PST) From: Javier Martinez Canillas To: Vikash Garodia , Linux regressions mailing list , Stanimir Varbanov Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "mka@chromium.org" , Albert Esteve , "stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org" , Enric Balletbo i Serra , Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , "Vikash Garodia (QUIC)" , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-media@vger.kernel.org" , Fritz Koenig , "Dikshita Agarwal (QUIC)" , "Rajeshwar Kurapaty (QUIC)" , Mauro Carvalho Chehab Subject: RE: [PATCH] Revert "venus: firmware: Correct non-pix start and end addresses" In-Reply-To: References: <20230207102254.1446461-1-javierm@redhat.com> <70c01751-1dd7-c4bd-a96e-94dea437aa40@redhat.com> <6f97a117-0d9c-e21b-9adf-50f2233ba9e3@leemhuis.info> <9a0bfef8-0b5d-f4d0-a8a5-4bbcacc5c0fb@leemhuis.info> Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 09:05:00 +0100 Message-ID: <87356wn6xf.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: regressions@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain Vikash Garodia writes: Hello Vikash, > Hi All, > [...] >> >>No reply from Mauro and Linus chose to not apply the revert I pointed him to. >>That at this point leads to the question: >> >>Vikash, did you or somebody else make any progress to fix this properly? > > We tried with different settings for the registers and arrive at a conclusion that > the original configuration was proper. There is no need to explicitly configure > the secure non-pixel region when there is no support for the usecase. So, in summary, > we are good to have the revert. > Perfect. Thanks a lot for looking at this. > Stan, could you please help with the revert and a pull request having this revert > alongwith other pending changes ? > Other fix posted is "media: venus: dec: Fix capture formats enumeration order": https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/patch/20230210081835.2054482-1-javierm@redhat.com/ -- Best regards, Javier Martinez Canillas Core Platforms Red Hat