From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de [80.237.130.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E9937E for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 07:40:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [2a02:8108:8980:2478:8cde:aa2c:f324:937e]; authenticated by wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1pfc1w-0008LS-OO; Fri, 24 Mar 2023 08:40:08 +0100 Message-ID: <9ba211dc-4f9e-e5a0-4f71-4db256ec1196@leemhuis.info> Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 08:40:08 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: regressions@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0 Subject: Re: [regression] Bug 217225 - can no longer alter /proc/acpi/ibm/fan Content-Language: en-US, de-DE From: "Linux regression tracking #update (Thorsten Leemhuis)" To: Hans de Goede Cc: "stable@vger.kernel.org" , "platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org" , ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, LKML , Linux kernel regressions list , Henrique de Moraes Holschuh Reply-To: Linux regressions mailing list , Linux regressions mailing list References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;regressions@leemhuis.info;1679643612;c69599ae; X-HE-SMSGID: 1pfc1w-0008LS-OO [TLDR: This mail in primarily relevant for Linux kernel regression tracking. See link in footer if these mails annoy you.] On 22.03.23 10:13, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: > Hi, Thorsten here, the Linux kernel's regression tracker. > > I noticed a regression report in bugzilla.kernel.org. As many (most?) > kernel developers don't keep an eye on it, I decided to forward it by > mail (note, the reporter *is not* CCed to this mail, see[1]). > > Note, it's a stable regression, so it's a bit unclear who's responsible. > I decided to forward it nevertheless, as some of you might want to be > aware of this or might even have an idea what's wrong. > > Quoting from https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217225 : Turned out it was a configuration error. Many thx to Hans helping the user figuring this out. For details see: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217225#c10 #regzbot resolve: configuration error due to changes on the distro side #regzbot ignore-activity Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.