From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 317662C88 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 08:07:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 421E16103C; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 08:06:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1633680419; bh=kGwVpcF3zNihtrnLcERvX+ksKyNuVpUrUUXYJeskBBI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=kbN+xLK01FyhYXntRsjNk0Lc0PeHB8E7rIeffLJwg55YhmntjMsMrtsKXe47417QT lRetSuu6gjBSLFIaf1qIvPNx75DaYggOI4ukaKt45ejDKjZU0pTKRTTm8g1omiPAM5 UEu+QjF2IDfBH/B7YAUNM4lJKjwgBUCbAlcPP4r8= Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 10:06:57 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Xuan Zhuo Cc: Corentin =?iso-8859-1?Q?No=EBl?= , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev, Eric Dumazet , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: virtio-net: kernel panic in virtio_net.c Message-ID: References: <1633623446.6192446-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: regressions@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1633623446.6192446-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 12:17:26AM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote: > On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 17:25:02 +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 11:06:12PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote: > > > On Thu, 07 Oct 2021 14:04:22 +0200, Corentin Noël wrote: > > > > I've been experiencing crashes with 5.14-rc1 and above that do not > > > > occur with 5.13, > > > > > > I should have fixed this problem before. I don't know why, I just looked at the > > > latest net code, and this commit seems to be lost. > > > > > > 1a8024239dacf53fcf39c0f07fbf2712af22864f virtio-net: fix for skb_over_panic inside big mode > > > > > > Can you test this patch again? > > > > That commit showed up in 5.13-rc5, so 5.14-rc1 and 5.13 should have had > > it in it, right? > > > > Yes, it may be lost due to conflicts during a certain merge. Really? I tried to apply that again to 5.14 and it did not work. So I do not understand what to do here, can you try to explain it better? thanks, greg k-h