Agreed and thanks for the pointers; please see the log files and
.config attached as requested.


Cheers,
Stefan


On Fri, 2021-12-10 at 15:01 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 10.12.21 14:45, Stefan Dietrich wrote:
> > thanks for keeping an eye on the issue. I've sent the files in
> > private
> > because I did not want to spam the mailing lists with them. Please
> > let
> > me know if this is the correct procedure.
>
> It's likely okay in this case, but FWIW: most of the time it's the
> wrong
> thing to do as outlined here:
>
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/admin-guide/reporting-issues.html#general-advice-for-further-interactions
>
> One reason for this: others that might want to look into the issue
> now
> or a in a year or two might be unable to if crucial data was only
> sent
> in private.
>
> Ciao, Thorsten
>
> > On Fri, 2021-12-10 at 10:40 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > > Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker speaking.
> > >
> > > On 02.12.21 23:34, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
> > > > Hi Stefan,
> > > >
> > > > Stefan Dietrich <roots@gmx.de> writes:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Vinicius,
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks for the patch - unfortunately it did not solve the
> > > > > issue
> > > > > and I
> > > > > am still getting reboots/lockups.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the test. We learned something, not a lot, but
> > > > something: the
> > > > problem you are facing is PTM related and it's not the same bug
> > > > as
> > > > that
> > > > PM deadlock.
> > > >
> > > > I am still trying to understand what's going on.
> > > >
> > > > Are you able to send me the 'dmesg' output for the two kernel
> > > > configs
> > > > (CONFIG_PCIE_PTM enabled and disabled)? (no need to bring the
> > > > network
> > > > interface up or down). Your kernel .config would be useful as
> > > > well.
> > >
> > > Stefan, could you provide the data Vinicius asked for? Or did you
> > > do
> > > that in private already? Or was progress made somewhere else and
> > > I
> > > simply missed this?
> > >
> > > Ciao, Thorsten, your Linux kernel regression tracker.
> > >
> > > P.S.: As a Linux kernel regression tracker I'm getting a lot of
> > > reports
> > > on my table. I can only look briefly into most of them.
> > > Unfortunately
> > > therefore I sometimes will get things wrong or miss something
> > > important.
> > > I hope that's not the case here; if you think it is, don't
> > > hesitate
> > > to
> > > tell me about it in a public reply. That's in everyone's
> > > interest, as
> > > what I wrote above might be misleading to everyone reading this;
> > > any
> > > suggestion I gave they thus might sent someone reading this down
> > > the
> > > wrong rabbit hole, which none of us wants.
> > >
> > > BTW, I have no personal interest in this issue, which is tracked
> > > using
> > > regzbot, my Linux kernel regression tracking bot
> > > (https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/regzbot/). I'm only
> > > posting
> > > this mail to get things rolling again and hence don't need to be
> > > CC
> > > on
> > > all further activities wrt to this regression.
> > >
> > > #regzbot poke
> > >
> > > > > On Wed, 2021-12-01 at 10:57 -0800, Vinicius Costa Gomes
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > Inspired by:
> > > > > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215129
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <
> > > > > > vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > Just to see if it's indeed the same problem as the bug
> > > > > > report
> > > > > > above.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c | 19
> > > > > > +++++++++++++
> > > > > > ------
> > > > > >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> > > > > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> > > > > > index 0e19b4d02e62..c58bf557a2a1 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> > > > > > @@ -6619,7 +6619,7 @@ static void
> > > > > > igc_deliver_wake_packet(struct
> > > > > > net_device *netdev)
> > > > > >  	netif_rx(skb);
> > > > > >  }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -static int __maybe_unused igc_resume(struct device *dev)
> > > > > > +static int __maybe_unused __igc_resume(struct device *dev,
> > > > > > bool rpm)
> > > > > >  {
> > > > > >  	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> > > > > >  	struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > > > > > @@ -6661,20 +6661,27 @@ static int __maybe_unused
> > > > > > igc_resume(struct
> > > > > > device *dev)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  	wr32(IGC_WUS, ~0);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -	rtnl_lock();
> > > > > > +	if (!rpm)
> > > > > > +		rtnl_lock();
> > > > > >  	if (!err && netif_running(netdev))
> > > > > >  		err = __igc_open(netdev, true);
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  	if (!err)
> > > > > >  		netif_device_attach(netdev);
> > > > > > -	rtnl_unlock();
> > > > > > +	if (!rpm)
> > > > > > +		rtnl_unlock();
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  	return err;
> > > > > >  }
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  static int __maybe_unused igc_runtime_resume(struct device
> > > > > > *dev)
> > > > > >  {
> > > > > > -	return igc_resume(dev);
> > > > > > +	return __igc_resume(dev, true);
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static int __maybe_unused igc_resume(struct device *dev)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > +	return __igc_resume(dev, false);
> > > > > >  }
> > > > > >
> > > > > >  static int __maybe_unused igc_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > > > > > @@ -6738,7 +6745,7 @@ static pci_ers_result_t
> > > > > > igc_io_error_detected(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > > > > >   *  @pdev: Pointer to PCI device
> > > > > >   *
> > > > > >   *  Restart the card from scratch, as if from a cold-boot.
> > > > > > Implementation
> > > > > > - *  resembles the first-half of the igc_resume routine.
> > > > > > + *  resembles the first-half of the __igc_resume routine.
> > > > > >   **/
> > > > > >  static pci_ers_result_t igc_io_slot_reset(struct pci_dev
> > > > > > *pdev)
> > > > > >  {
> > > > > > @@ -6777,7 +6784,7 @@ static pci_ers_result_t
> > > > > > igc_io_slot_reset(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > > > > >   *
> > > > > >   *  This callback is called when the error recovery driver
> > > > > > tells us
> > > > > > that
> > > > > >   *  its OK to resume normal operation. Implementation
> > > > > > resembles the
> > > > > > - *  second-half of the igc_resume routine.
> > > > > > + *  second-half of the __igc_resume routine.
> > > > > >   */
> > > > > >  static void igc_io_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > > > > >  {
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> >
> >