From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de [80.237.130.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D33E20F6 for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 14:12:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [2a02:8108:8980:2478:8cde:aa2c:f324:937e]; authenticated by wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1pnKAD-0000HC-Me; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 16:12:33 +0200 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 16:12:33 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: regressions@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bgmac: fix *initial* chip reset to support BCM5358 Content-Language: en-US, de-DE To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ricardo_Ca=c3=b1uelo?= , Linux regressions mailing list , Florian Fainelli , =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= , =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= Cc: "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Arnd Bergmann , netdev@vger.kernel.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, Jon Mason References: <20230227091156.19509-1-zajec5@gmail.com> <20230404134613.wtikjp6v63isofoc@rcn-XPS-13-9305> <002c1f96-b82f-6be7-2530-68c5ae1d962d@milecki.pl> <569c0f2f-ff7b-9367-e33e-ddf37a13232b@collabora.com> From: "Linux regression tracking #update (Thorsten Leemhuis)" Reply-To: Linux regressions mailing list In-Reply-To: <569c0f2f-ff7b-9367-e33e-ddf37a13232b@collabora.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;regressions@leemhuis.info;1681481557;6c0a5990; X-HE-SMSGID: 1pnKAD-0000HC-Me On 14.04.23 16:08, Ricardo Cañuelo wrote: > Hi Thorsten, > > On 14/4/23 16:04, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: >> What happened to this? It seems there wasn't any progress since above >> mail week. But well, seems to be a odd issue anyway (is that one of >> those issues that CI systems find, but don't cause practical issues in >> the field?). Hence: can somebody with more knowledge about this please >> tell if it this is something I can likely drop from the list of tacked >> regressions? > > From Rafał's answer, I think we can consider this a false positive and > move on. great, thx for confirming! #regzbot inconclusive: CI false positive #regzbot ignore-activity Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr That page also explains what to do if mails like this annoy you.