From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C8CC433ED for ; Sun, 9 May 2021 09:31:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 149C260C40 for ; Sun, 9 May 2021 09:31:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229579AbhEIJcy (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 May 2021 05:32:54 -0400 Received: from gpm.stappers.nl ([82.161.218.215]:52943 "EHLO gpm.stappers.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229555AbhEIJcy (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 May 2021 05:32:54 -0400 Received: by gpm.stappers.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 672E0304176; Sun, 9 May 2021 11:31:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 9 May 2021 11:31:50 +0200 From: Geert Stappers To: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: workflow Message-ID: <20210509093150.jtaizeq5dyyot3qx@gpm.stappers.nl> References: <20210509073338.GA1428@agape.jhs> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210509073338.GA1428@agape.jhs> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 09, 2021 at 09:33:38AM +0200, Fabio Aiuto wrote: > Good morning all, Hail all time zones, > I need some clarifications about the workflow. > > As a newcomer in kernel development and open source development > in general I got a little used to with the forkflow in Greg's staging > subsystem. > > The tool I'm used to work with is, at the moment, command line git > against Greg's tree. > > I tried to apply the same approach on rust-for-linux tree but I noticed > some differences, first of all the use of GitHub. > > One misterious to me side effect is that the command `git show` on HEAD > pointing to a PR doesn't show diffs. > > After these two enlightening informal meetings I realized that, for this > particular project, I must (and I'm happy to do it) align with you all > using GitHub. Is there a particular join procedure you recommend? I think original poster is not aware of "Rust for Linux" already in the next branch. > thank you, My appology for this way too short message. > fabio Groeten Geert Stappers -- Silence is hard to parse