Re: [PATCH v4 15/20] docs: add Rust documentation

From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>,
	Adam Bratschi-Kaye <ark.email@gmail.com>,
	Boris-Chengbiao Zhou <bobo1239@web.de>,
	Wu XiangCheng <bobwxc@email.cn>, Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>,
	Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Yuki Okushi <jtitor@2k36.org>,
	Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	Finn Behrens <me@kloenk.de>,
	Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	rust-for-linux <rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@gmail.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@google.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/20] docs: add Rust documentation
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 23:50:42 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <61547556-790f-f74f-ca2e-b2fde714a7fa@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANiq72mQffofeW4C=AWF4CHu=WpgpwB4hAv_q9QiTX_+U38qGg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Miguel,

On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 09:19:37 +0100,
Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> Hi Akira,
> 
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 11:47 AM Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/rust/logo.svg b/Documentation/rust/logo.svg
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..65be792a5abe
>>> --- /dev/null
>>
>> How about adding a suitable license identifier in a comment?
> 
> For the next round, I did not apply this suggestion, because it is
> unclear which license identifier to use: it would be probably be the
> same as the `COPYING-logo` one (which would be used also for the Tux
> SVG, if it gets merged -- it was sent a while ago).

I see.

As I see v2 15/20, the SVG figure is among other documentation updates.
IIUC, this figure/logo was in PNG at first, but Jon suggested vector graphics.
If this is the case, it deserves an individual patch with a changelog
explaining why it is in SVG, where the Tux figure came from, what was the
original PNG logo, who contributed the SVG conversion, etc.

I understand you did all the SVG work, didn't you?
I don't think those many Co-developed-by tags apply to this figure.

I'm saying this because this figure/logo can be reused in other open-
source projects on its own.  It would be worth clarifying its origin 
in the Git history as well as in COPYING-logo.

        Thanks, Akira

> 
> Cheers,
> Miguel