From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723F4C43215 for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 02:00:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54068206ED for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 02:00:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725939AbfLCCAg (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Dec 2019 21:00:36 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:31254 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725941AbfLCCAg (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Dec 2019 21:00:36 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id xB31xnEm005273 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 21:00:35 -0500 Received: from e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.101]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2wm6cy75uy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 21:00:35 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 02:00:32 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195) by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.135) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 3 Dec 2019 02:00:30 -0000 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id xB320TCk63045710 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 3 Dec 2019 02:00:29 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC0A652063; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 02:00:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.85.147.107]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A5E15204E; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 02:00:28 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] SELinux patches for v5.5 From: Mimi Zohar To: Paul Moore Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, Roberto Sassu , initramfs Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 21:00:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: <1575302310.4793.379.camel@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19120302-0020-0000-0000-00000392C1A5 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19120302-0021-0000-0000-000021E9DFB5 Message-Id: <1575338427.4793.486.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,18.0.572 definitions=2019-12-02_06:2019-11-29,2019-12-02 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-1912030016 Sender: selinux-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: selinux@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2019-12-02 at 15:04 -0500, Paul Moore wrote: > On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 10:58 AM Mimi Zohar wrote: > > [Truncated Cc list, adding Roberto and the initramfs mailing list] > > > > Hi Paul, > > > > On Tue, 2019-11-26 at 16:24 -0500, Paul Moore wrote: > > > > > - Allow file labeling before the policy is loaded. This should ease > > > some of the burden when the policy is initially loaded (no need to > > > relabel files), but it should also help enable some new system > > > concepts which dynamically create the root filesystem in the initrd. > > > > Any chance you're planning on using Roberto's patches for including > > security xattrs in the initramfs?[1] > > [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-initramfs/msg04771.html > > I'm assuming you're not asking about me personally? ;) No, of course not.  I was wondering if "help enable some new system concepts which dynamically create the root filesystem in the initrd" adds SELinux labels on the root filesystem. Mimi