From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: jmorris@namei.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: keescook@chromium.org, john.johansen@canonical.com,
penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, paul@paul-moore.com
Subject: [PATCH 77/97] LSM: Correct handling of ENOSYS in inode_setxattr
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 14:43:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190228224356.2608-8-casey@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190228224356.2608-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com>
The usual "bail on fail" behavior of LSM hooks doesn't
work for security_inode_setxattr(). Modules are allowed
to return -ENOSYS if the attribute specifed isn't one
they manage. Fix the code to accomodate this unusal case.
This requires changes to the hooks in SELinux and Smack.
Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
---
security/security.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
security/selinux/hooks.c | 7 ++-----
security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 10 +++++-----
3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index bb0eea873a7e..105b5ee22bcf 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -1343,24 +1343,24 @@ int security_inode_getattr(const struct path *path)
int security_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name,
const void *value, size_t size, int flags)
{
- int ret;
+ struct security_hook_list *hp;
+ int rc = -ENOSYS;
if (unlikely(IS_PRIVATE(d_backing_inode(dentry))))
return 0;
- /*
- * SELinux and Smack integrate the cap call,
- * so assume that all LSMs supplying this call do so.
- */
- ret = call_int_hook(inode_setxattr, 1, dentry, name, value, size,
- flags);
- if (ret == 1)
- ret = cap_inode_setxattr(dentry, name, value, size, flags);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
- ret = ima_inode_setxattr(dentry, name, value, size);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
+ hlist_for_each_entry(hp, &security_hook_heads.inode_setxattr, list) {
+ rc = hp->hook.inode_setxattr(dentry, name, value, size, flags);
+ if (rc != -ENOSYS)
+ break;
+ }
+ if (rc == -ENOSYS)
+ rc = cap_inode_setxattr(dentry, name, value, size, flags);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+ rc = ima_inode_setxattr(dentry, name, value, size);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
return evm_inode_setxattr(dentry, name, value, size);
}
diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
index f58c96e2b6c1..501aed18f100 100644
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -2998,13 +2998,10 @@ static int selinux_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name,
int rc = 0;
if (strcmp(name, XATTR_NAME_SELINUX)) {
- rc = cap_inode_setxattr(dentry, name, value, size, flags);
- if (rc)
- return rc;
-
/* Not an attribute we recognize, so just check the
ordinary setattr permission. */
- return dentry_has_perm(current_cred(), dentry, FILE__SETATTR);
+ rc = dentry_has_perm(current_cred(), dentry, FILE__SETATTR);
+ return rc ? rc : -ENOSYS;
}
sbsec = selinux_superblock(inode->i_sb);
diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
index c45e2dc3f959..c84c71a31b80 100644
--- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
+++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
@@ -1194,7 +1194,7 @@ static int smack_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name,
strncmp(value, TRANS_TRUE, TRANS_TRUE_SIZE) != 0)
rc = -EINVAL;
} else
- rc = cap_inode_setxattr(dentry, name, value, size, flags);
+ rc = -ENOSYS;
if (check_priv && !smack_privileged(CAP_MAC_ADMIN))
rc = -EPERM;
@@ -1208,11 +1208,11 @@ static int smack_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name,
rc = -EINVAL;
}
- smk_ad_init(&ad, __func__, LSM_AUDIT_DATA_DENTRY);
- smk_ad_setfield_u_fs_path_dentry(&ad, dentry);
-
if (rc == 0) {
- rc = smk_curacc(smk_of_inode(d_backing_inode(dentry)), MAY_WRITE, &ad);
+ smk_ad_init(&ad, __func__, LSM_AUDIT_DATA_DENTRY);
+ smk_ad_setfield_u_fs_path_dentry(&ad, dentry);
+ rc = smk_curacc(smk_of_inode(d_backing_inode(dentry)),
+ MAY_WRITE, &ad);
rc = smk_bu_inode(d_backing_inode(dentry), MAY_WRITE, rc);
}
--
2.17.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-28 22:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-28 22:43 [PATCH 00/97] LSM: Complete module stacking Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 71/97] LSM: Add secmark refcounting to call_one list Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 72/97] LSM: Add secmark refcounting to call_one list - part 2 Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 73/97] LSM: refactor security_setprocattr Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 74/97] Smack: Detect if secmarks can be safely used Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 75/97] LSM: Support multiple LSMs using inode_init_security Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 76/97] LSM: Use full security context in security_inode_setsecctx Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 78/97] LSM: Infrastructure security blobs for mount options Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 79/97] LSM: Fix for security_init_inode_security Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 80/97] Smack: Advertise the secid to netlabel Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 81/97] LSM: Change error detection for UDP peer security Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 82/97] Smack: Fix setting of the CIPSO MLS_CAT flags Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 83/97] Smack: Set netlabel flags properly on new label import Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 84/97] Netlabel: Add a secattr comparison API function Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 85/97] Smack: Let netlabel do the work on the ambient domain Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 86/97] Smack: Don't set the socket label on each send Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 87/97] Smack: Let netlabel do the work on connections Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 88/97] Netlabel: Return the labeling type on socket Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 89/97] " Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 90/97] " Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 91/97] " Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 92/97] LSM: Remember the NLTYPE of netlabel sockets Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 93/97] Smack: Use the NLTYPE on output Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 94/97] LSM: Hook for netlabel reconciliation Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 95/97] LSM: Avoid network conflicts in SELinux and Smack Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 96/97] LSM: Apply Netlabel consitancy checks on send and connect Casey Schaufler
2019-02-28 22:43 ` [PATCH 97/97] Smack: Remove the exclusive bit Casey Schaufler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190228224356.2608-8-casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).