From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D7AFC282DA for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 20:00:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 369EB2084B for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 20:00:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.com header.i=@yahoo.com header.b="YnubYGcA" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726841AbfDIUAa (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2019 16:00:30 -0400 Received: from sonic304-28.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([66.163.191.154]:41668 "EHLO sonic304-28.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726836AbfDIUAa (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2019 16:00:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1554840028; bh=DXZobVlHba7NLExIjhRRZRkmastZlDIkiPrs42J8njM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From:Subject; b=YnubYGcAZopfMSo/XOCaB7g2UfyLS4unYkkRSqdvWmvvSmSAokfLcX3S+i2qcWWJyDKUm+xj+lK1p1arNzXP7bQJUGrnK+nmnwozZqCykZ9+NFipdlGvlKVV7lUmfx+5Oae9noJ5NIw82tPL0zGD4XpwS23g8jQ0v+Y5edMLJfOyKJOeMwQXN65Xxs8kTorZUVAUGZffT2mSbsMt/e4bOC9p+F6Wr0LASiDrFPsFB2PfkIRhIqOWCGjfeSPzMvLZyqn0T4lA+gJ8+X1hr7v2ve64RazEv5zCsC1MpKGhbpN1eBGgpQ81Hpaa767HgI2eOJmjBAvnlzqA64oVSFwGVA== X-YMail-OSG: LNvfwXEVM1kU4XwBkpDcb.ka4TmenpTCi5d99eRiML2Ud1etYTGM0uz5eTKgYCr w833iA49KqKrSs.VuL6qCYzDrqAi51i_Ae9RIQff2NeTi1F7SLZhqko_NJUMD0IbPJLXg6jLeWvG 8MalXDprege7ibXKPFDAwafTwG5RbNuNzqfxVVM85kjztZjEexmPedJ0Iu6qbg43jQ227YTmr8is p_BcowLPKRek.rXTWGIqhxmmh2yugywFLIXoGoaXGewEEvbWa.2ds.sNSTQSSKIyl_EtJLlUG5v0 bgBNtTsNZGhO6huRAHa7J0UB9za_h.9o48u6rXxQyWOuPCajtmWkiOf46VVWX171S1b019EO3c.5 ixRnP_PnIgTeNVnYToOSeNyNx3AsV0zsET7dYTGA3AXARJ5q8BrEBRJpvI1ZDIPGWP1TePBv.Z2y il8fOctD.cSwj5cWQX7XIAnFOkW0Trzjy.UvXocuEWnz9wQFIxi9u1Kk1r2YQf9mb_wvBVvcJE7t D1ubqIugFtSi5US_c3bT39JoSzW.K_ke5Fh3S8nt.qKl3bIjpS2Z9kMxpSrTb7wRU2JJmi1QDVRx t0amT3KEuUzEjl8xmPoRAgH1lgYL0UeUd8VgoswVuRM2tVGoN1fpepQFk6JV5mOeHDQx3Ntsbbu2 fqrQYU7Gd9Jgp9eNeQ3FFmqSxQdjpAr0zSaWM.oyu9TWkA1d3HI_DpeXJc.h0GLxuCmFqDlyobb. .4EEiv1QMhI1hp_AQJO45UQIEP9wqW05lC49KeRTtt4nxA8JRvASEjt61SGCtlgs6HqvIl36ko__ fuIfzYMZm8X0dPRzfqGb2uemHfPxaA5rNycManaXBpI2YsQ51VY01XJSGTxaXvMYntKZy63JrT93 7neXzKnkilwu_BLb.fjHb4EFDyuiQArZxBbTjPpcJXhCT9Znoy7xyIrjnwzBZhldtSvhCmpCJN5z YfEvfGeJptRfqJ4bOVvgtSAEX2HXYSMVs8yzBhzDIdzsse91eG7XNJ504UrlRCddOfvdYyW8OBoj TQzaoR9Z0CMocf64iqnzNse1UVUbQAr_NVyd4Rze2ZVOGZ6Y3TzqQKGCMBCjvgtGhz.L13pa6oza KqxMxczUZMhVjagbx0U0m0BYTMxYSdhRKcLJkP9BQ43btFLWnfmdcPbvfcHp8 Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic304.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 20:00:28 +0000 Received: from c-67-169-65-224.hsd1.ca.comcast.net (EHLO localhost.localdomain) ([67.169.65.224]) by smtp425.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 102fe805e930c993b64b67f47c5c2e96; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 20:00:24 +0000 (UTC) From: Casey Schaufler To: casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org Cc: casey@schaufler-ca.com, keescook@chromium.org, john.johansen@canonical.com, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, paul@paul-moore.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov Subject: [PATCH 28/59] NET: Remove scaffolding on secmarks Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 12:58:53 -0700 Message-Id: <20190409195924.1509-29-casey@schaufler-ca.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.0 In-Reply-To: <20190409195924.1509-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com> References: <20190409195924.1509-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com> Sender: selinux-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: selinux@vger.kernel.org Replace the lsm_export scaffolding in xt_SECMARK.c This raises an issue, in that Smack users have been using SECMARK_MODE_SEL, which is suppoed to be exclusively for SELinux. This is worked around in the code, but not fully addressed. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler --- net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c b/net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c index 2def8d8898e6..9a2a97c200a2 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c +++ b/net/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.c @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ static int checkentry_lsm(struct xt_secmark_target_info *info) info->secctx[SECMARK_SECCTX_MAX - 1] = '\0'; info->secid = 0; + lsm_export_init(&le); err = security_secctx_to_secid(info->secctx, strlen(info->secctx), &le); if (err) { if (err == -EINVAL) @@ -63,7 +64,12 @@ static int checkentry_lsm(struct xt_secmark_target_info *info) return err; } - lsm_export_secid(&le, &info->secid); + /* Smack is cheating, using SECMARK_MODE_SEL */ + if (le.selinux) + info->secid = le.selinux; + else + info->secid = le.smack; + if (!info->secid) { pr_info_ratelimited("unable to map security context \'%s\'\n", info->secctx); -- 2.19.1