From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=kEwY=UU=vger.kernel.org=selinux-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B798CC48BE3
	for <selinux@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 01:39:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9141E208CA
	for <selinux@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 01:39:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1725958AbfFUBj3 (ORCPT <rfc822;selinux@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 20 Jun 2019 21:39:29 -0400
Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:4874 "EHLO mga01.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1725936AbfFUBj3 (ORCPT <rfc822;selinux@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 20 Jun 2019 21:39:29 -0400
X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN
X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38])
  by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Jun 2019 18:32:27 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.63,398,1557212400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="311852028"
Received: from mudigirx-mobl1.gar.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.252.61.12])
  by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Jun 2019 18:32:22 -0700
Date:   Fri, 21 Jun 2019 04:32:20 +0300
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Cc:     linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
        selinux@vger.kernel.org,
        Bill Roberts <william.c.roberts@intel.com>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey.schaufler@intel.com>,
        James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
        Cedric Xing <cedric.xing@intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>,
        "Dr . Greg Wettstein" <greg@enjellic.com>,
        Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/12] security: x86/sgx: SGX vs. LSM
Message-ID: <20190621013220.GJ20474@linux.intel.com>
References: <20190619222401.14942-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190619222401.14942-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: selinux-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <selinux.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: selinux@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 03:23:49PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> [SNAP]

The reason for delaying my proposal for encl->refcount (which I will
post as RFC and won't merge it before getting screened from you) was
that I really focused making the most well thought comments to this.

Generally I think that we need to get your SRCU changes in before
anything in the form that the patch does not anything else but only
that. Without doing that comparing changes dealing with the life-cycle
of an enclave is way too much mind bending.

/Jarkko