selinux.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	primiano@google.com, rsavitski@google.com, jeffv@google.com,
	kernel-team@android.com, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	Matthew Garrett <matthewgarrett@google.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	selinux@vger.kernel.org, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
	<x86@kernel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_event: Add support for LSM and SELinux checks
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 12:54:38 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191014165438.GB105106@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191014093544.GB2328@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:35:44AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 12:03:30PM -0400, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> 
> > @@ -4761,6 +4762,7 @@ int perf_event_release_kernel(struct perf_event *event)
> >  	}
> >  
> >  no_ctx:
> > +	security_perf_event_free(event);
> >  	put_event(event); /* Must be the 'last' reference */
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> 
> > @@ -10553,11 +10568,16 @@ perf_event_alloc(struct perf_event_attr *attr, int cpu,
> >  		}
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	err = security_perf_event_alloc(event);
> > +	if (err)
> > +		goto err_security;
> > +
> >  	/* symmetric to unaccount_event() in _free_event() */
> >  	account_event(event);
> >  
> >  	return event;
> >  
> > +err_security:
> >  err_addr_filters:
> >  	kfree(event->addr_filter_ranges);
> >  
> 
> There's a bunch of problems here I think:
> 
>  - err_security is named wrong; the naming scheme is to name the label
>    after the last thing that succeeded / first thing that needs to be
>    undone.
> 
>  - per that, you're forgetting to undo 'get_callchain_buffers()'

Yes, you're right. Tested your fix below. Sorry to miss this.

>  - perf_event_release_kernel() is not a full match to
>    perf_event_alloc(), inherited events get created by
>    perf_event_alloc() but never pass through
>    perf_event_release_kernel().

Oh, through inherit_event(). Thanks for pointing this semantic out, did not
know that.

> I'm thinking the below patch on top should ammend these issues; please
> verify.

Yes, applied your diff below and verified that the events are getting freed
as they were in my initial set of tests. The diff also looks good to me.

I squashed your diff below and will resend as v3. Since you modified this
patch a lot, I will add your Co-developed-by tag as well.

thanks, Peter!

 - Joel


> ---
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -4540,6 +4540,8 @@ static void _free_event(struct perf_even
>  
>  	unaccount_event(event);
>  
> +	security_perf_event_free(event);
> +
>  	if (event->rb) {
>  		/*
>  		 * Can happen when we close an event with re-directed output.
> @@ -4774,7 +4776,6 @@ int perf_event_release_kernel(struct per
>  	}
>  
>  no_ctx:
> -	security_perf_event_free(event);
>  	put_event(event); /* Must be the 'last' reference */
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -10595,14 +10596,18 @@ perf_event_alloc(struct perf_event_attr
>  
>  	err = security_perf_event_alloc(event);
>  	if (err)
> -		goto err_security;
> +		goto err_callchain_buffer;
>  
>  	/* symmetric to unaccount_event() in _free_event() */
>  	account_event(event);
>  
>  	return event;
>  
> -err_security:
> +err_callchain_buffer:
> +	if (!event->parent) {
> +		if (event->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_CALLCHAIN)
> +			put_callchain_buffers();
> +	}
>  err_addr_filters:
>  	kfree(event->addr_filter_ranges);
>  

      reply	other threads:[~2019-10-14 16:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-11 16:03 [PATCH] perf_event: Add support for LSM and SELinux checks Joel Fernandes (Google)
2019-10-11 16:35 ` James Morris
2019-10-14  9:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-14 16:54   ` Joel Fernandes [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191014165438.GB105106@google.com \
    --to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=jeffv@google.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthewgarrett@google.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=primiano@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rsavitski@google.com \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).