From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, casey@schaufler-ca.com,
linux-audit@redhat.com, keescook@chromium.org,
john.johansen@canonical.com, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp,
paul@paul-moore.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v28 21/25] audit: support non-syscall auxiliary records
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 01:02:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202107230058.3lMBsPSR-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210722004758.12371-22-casey@schaufler-ca.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 10113 bytes --]
Hi Casey,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on pcmoore-audit/next]
[also build test ERROR on nf/master linus/master v5.14-rc2]
[cannot apply to nf-next/master next-20210722]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Casey-Schaufler/LSM-Infrastructure-management-of-the-sock-security/20210722-094735
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/audit.git next
config: openrisc-randconfig-r025-20210722 (attached as .config)
compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 10.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/63ea5078624b9ff368f945d654ace5f79160fb6a
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Casey-Schaufler/LSM-Infrastructure-management-of-the-sock-security/20210722-094735
git checkout 63ea5078624b9ff368f945d654ace5f79160fb6a
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
mkdir build_dir
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-10.3.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=openrisc SHELL=/bin/bash
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from init/init_task.c:12:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
--
In file included from arch/openrisc/kernel/ptrace.c:23:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
arch/openrisc/kernel/ptrace.c:157:17: warning: no previous prototype for 'do_syscall_trace_enter' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
157 | asmlinkage long do_syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/openrisc/kernel/ptrace.c:176:17: warning: no previous prototype for 'do_syscall_trace_leave' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
176 | asmlinkage void do_syscall_trace_leave(struct pt_regs *regs)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
In file included from kernel/fork.c:63:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
kernel/fork.c:162:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'arch_release_task_struct' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
162 | void __weak arch_release_task_struct(struct task_struct *tsk)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/fork.c:752:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'arch_task_cache_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
752 | void __init __weak arch_task_cache_init(void) { }
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/fork.c:847:12: warning: no previous prototype for 'arch_dup_task_struct' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
847 | int __weak arch_dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *dst,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
In file included from kernel/exit.c:49:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
kernel/exit.c:1810:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'abort' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
1810 | __weak void abort(void)
| ^~~~~
--
In file included from kernel/audit.c:51:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
kernel/audit.c:1781:14: warning: no previous prototype for 'audit_serial' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
1781 | unsigned int audit_serial(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/audit.c: In function 'audit_log_vformat':
kernel/audit.c:1929:2: warning: function 'audit_log_vformat' might be a candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
1929 | len = vsnprintf(skb_tail_pointer(skb), avail, fmt, args);
| ^~~
kernel/audit.c:1938:3: warning: function 'audit_log_vformat' might be a candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
1938 | len = vsnprintf(skb_tail_pointer(skb), avail, fmt, args2);
| ^~~
--
In file included from fs/pipe.c:23:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
fs/pipe.c:741:15: warning: no previous prototype for 'account_pipe_buffers' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
741 | unsigned long account_pipe_buffers(struct user_struct *user,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/pipe.c:747:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'too_many_pipe_buffers_soft' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
747 | bool too_many_pipe_buffers_soft(unsigned long user_bufs)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/pipe.c:754:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'too_many_pipe_buffers_hard' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
754 | bool too_many_pipe_buffers_hard(unsigned long user_bufs)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/pipe.c:761:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'pipe_is_unprivileged_user' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
761 | bool pipe_is_unprivileged_user(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/pipe.c:1231:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'pipe_resize_ring' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
1231 | int pipe_resize_ring(struct pipe_inode_info *pipe, unsigned int nr_slots)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
In file included from include/linux/fsnotify.h:16,
from kernel/trace/trace.c:49:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
kernel/trace/trace.c: In function 'trace_check_vprintf':
kernel/trace/trace.c:3815:3: warning: function 'trace_check_vprintf' might be a candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
3815 | trace_seq_vprintf(&iter->seq, iter->fmt, ap);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/trace/trace.c:3870:3: warning: function 'trace_check_vprintf' might be a candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
3870 | trace_seq_vprintf(&iter->seq, p, ap);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
At top level:
kernel/trace/trace.c:1692:37: warning: 'tracing_max_lat_fops' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
1692 | static const struct file_operations tracing_max_lat_fops;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
In file included from net/socket.c:81:
>> include/linux/audit.h:557:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
557 | +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
| ^
net/socket.c: In function '__sys_getsockopt':
net/socket.c:2178:6: warning: variable 'max_optlen' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
2178 | int max_optlen;
| ^~~~~~~~~~
vim +557 include/linux/audit.h
553
554 extern int audit_n_rules;
555 extern int audit_signals;
556 #else /* CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL */
> 557 +static inline struct audit_context *audit_alloc_local(gfp_t gfpflags)
558 {
559 return NULL;
560 }
561 static inline void audit_free_context(struct audit_context *context)
562 { }
563 static inline int audit_alloc(struct task_struct *task)
564 {
565 return 0;
566 }
567 static inline void audit_free(struct task_struct *task)
568 { }
569 static inline void audit_syscall_entry(int major, unsigned long a0,
570 unsigned long a1, unsigned long a2,
571 unsigned long a3)
572 { }
573 static inline void audit_syscall_exit(void *pt_regs)
574 { }
575 static inline bool audit_dummy_context(void)
576 {
577 return true;
578 }
579 static inline void audit_set_context(struct task_struct *task, struct audit_context *ctx)
580 { }
581 static inline struct audit_context *audit_context(void)
582 {
583 return NULL;
584 }
585 static inline struct filename *audit_reusename(const __user char *name)
586 {
587 return NULL;
588 }
589 static inline void audit_getname(struct filename *name)
590 { }
591 static inline void audit_inode(struct filename *name,
592 const struct dentry *dentry,
593 unsigned int aflags)
594 { }
595 static inline void audit_file(struct file *file)
596 {
597 }
598 static inline void audit_inode_parent_hidden(struct filename *name,
599 const struct dentry *dentry)
600 { }
601 static inline void audit_inode_child(struct inode *parent,
602 const struct dentry *dentry,
603 const unsigned char type)
604 { }
605 static inline void audit_core_dumps(long signr)
606 { }
607 static inline void audit_seccomp(unsigned long syscall, long signr, int code)
608 { }
609 static inline void audit_seccomp_actions_logged(const char *names,
610 const char *old_names, int res)
611 { }
612 static inline void audit_ipc_obj(struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp)
613 { }
614 static inline void audit_ipc_set_perm(unsigned long qbytes, uid_t uid,
615 gid_t gid, umode_t mode)
616 { }
617 static inline void audit_bprm(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
618 { }
619 static inline int audit_socketcall(int nargs, unsigned long *args)
620 {
621 return 0;
622 }
623
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 34024 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-22 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20210722004758.12371-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 00/25] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 01/25] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 02/25] LSM: Add the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 03/25] LSM: provide lsm name and id slot mappings Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 04/25] IMA: avoid label collisions with stacked LSMs Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 05/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 06/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 07/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 08/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 09/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 10/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_task_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 11/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 12/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2021-07-23 23:56 ` kernel test robot
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 13/25] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 14/25] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 15/25] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 16/25] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 17/25] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 18/25] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 19/25] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 20/25] LSM: Verify LSM display sanity in binder Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 21/25] audit: support non-syscall auxiliary records Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 17:02 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 22/25] Audit: Add record for multiple process LSM attributes Casey Schaufler
2021-08-12 20:59 ` Paul Moore
2021-08-12 22:38 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-13 15:31 ` Paul Moore
2021-08-13 18:48 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-13 20:43 ` Paul Moore
2021-08-13 21:47 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-16 18:57 ` Paul Moore
2021-08-18 21:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-19 0:47 ` Paul Moore
2021-08-19 0:56 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-19 22:41 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-20 19:06 ` Paul Moore
2021-08-20 19:17 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-20 23:48 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-24 14:45 ` Paul Moore
2021-08-24 15:20 ` Casey Schaufler
2021-08-24 16:14 ` Paul Moore
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 23/25] Audit: Add record for multiple object " Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 24/25] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context Casey Schaufler
2021-07-22 0:47 ` [PATCH v28 25/25] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202107230058.3lMBsPSR-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).