From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 685C1C433E0 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 21:11:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 446A12087C for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 21:11:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Se4PgoB6" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727811AbgGaVLk (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jul 2020 17:11:40 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:23647 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727053AbgGaVLk (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jul 2020 17:11:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1596229898; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=t/cV/Qzw+m6vy3WX4hnJbiztl48D5GgRBllbpSaxlaE=; b=Se4PgoB60jnAchzANeSO959FREWWfp1KOBv564waFFzmJ4IG7t3YOhiSOtqS7JDJMWwMsR xZRj77WgXBKrpMo4MYky3m0DICIxpoU7/QRm3KnxIkLk6WwUkKwRScxhNJq2x7vaIy939A tmk0qpBLtfMZwxd41KQS+xnFEVnHDMI= Received: from mail-lf1-f71.google.com (mail-lf1-f71.google.com [209.85.167.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-313-0qSgwAd0PsiQQyJ5wUsIJg-1; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 17:11:33 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 0qSgwAd0PsiQQyJ5wUsIJg-1 Received: by mail-lf1-f71.google.com with SMTP id p192so9412331lfa.0 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 14:11:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=t/cV/Qzw+m6vy3WX4hnJbiztl48D5GgRBllbpSaxlaE=; b=EOlLZu+HR/f71b59xouhKKphATqn9fwywH2YvTMaE2zatbIP1F21WlyBILp6BCxE1/ mO1Gm27Ejj9ObEUcduO3PtJNcZjr4C20J1fhktlTrqrJSGhbqbL8nP8seZ4Wq6MxMt05 /deWKJAql4haJ3RUJZ2aqr2poZ3tlDVm0gFThUMZQwnVzO1h6yfstRiXvTH8hw9A7Xtv GUq4uD7qxc1FoBc+hq0MLDMyIvroT5fkqNQO/T4L6/pB5cCqWjXw5Ip8IqHoQTyzm2pX CrDeCPGBOfIKchggkEGbY6zne+nrFrqzDsjwyblBnou0/wrsS+8IRyytfK7KxeY38ura l8/A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5303mXABPY00EFFKJTxEJr1eTCOMN9Gcz8che7AjBDnLrl/uFEug FBwkmqN+3VdJ8TXwPFiQGAxhyM4ZQ3Sta1H2C/wgRilPgBqMUVFtjUe6+SVWz4kBJgnyxjPFXdF RRBnI+WHjksl/DLifY6E9Z0ZcBZ3BaKWB1Q== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:91da:: with SMTP id u26mr2717495ljg.311.1596229891693; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 14:11:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwkgAgkjNraM6smS/ppkFqgoSRvP100WF7cTneBaAlw3Aw8TBEIJjlS7YG58fdsMdaZetuADElTcjbJ9drquU0= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:91da:: with SMTP id u26mr2717484ljg.311.1596229891457; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 14:11:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200731173309.31528-1-william.c.roberts@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20200731173309.31528-1-william.c.roberts@intel.com> From: Ondrej Mosnacek Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 23:11:20 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts/ci: license as Apache 2.0 To: William Roberts Cc: SElinux list , William Roberts Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: selinux-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: selinux@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 7:33 PM wrote: > From: William Roberts > > License the ci scripts with a permissive, OSI approved license, such as > Apache 2.0. Thanks! On second thought though, I guess any open source license would be fine, since the scripts don't "link" with the rest of the testsuite (which is GPLv2). So if you prefer some more permissive (or shorter... :) license or just public domain, you can probably use that, too. > > Signed-off-by: William Roberts > --- > scripts/ci/LICENSE | 202 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > scripts/ci/fedora-test-runner.sh | 2 +- > scripts/ci/travis-kvm-setup.sh | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 204 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 scripts/ci/LICENSE > > diff --git a/scripts/ci/fedora-test-runner.sh b/scripts/ci/fedora-test-runner.sh > index 569723387f6b..8d6a572eb094 100755 > --- a/scripts/ci/fedora-test-runner.sh > +++ b/scripts/ci/fedora-test-runner.sh > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > #!/usr/bin/env bash > - > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 I think you should also add a copyright line alongside the SPDX header. See: https://matija.suklje.name/how-and-why-to-properly-write-copyright-statements-in-your-code#why-have-the-copyright-statement > set -ev > > # > diff --git a/scripts/ci/travis-kvm-setup.sh b/scripts/ci/travis-kvm-setup.sh > index 8d4cfb79f7d7..275d05299971 100755 > --- a/scripts/ci/travis-kvm-setup.sh > +++ b/scripts/ci/travis-kvm-setup.sh > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > #!/usr/bin/env bash > - > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 Ditto. > set -ev > > TEST_RUNNER="scripts/ci/fedora-test-runner.sh" > -- > 2.17.1 > -- Ondrej Mosnacek Software Engineer, Platform Security - SELinux kernel Red Hat, Inc.