From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96720C2BB1D for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 21:50:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E6702076B for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 21:50:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=paul-moore-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@paul-moore-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="W/qz2Sgx" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2440899AbgDNVub (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2020 17:50:31 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53268 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2440827AbgDNVuU (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2020 17:50:20 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x532.google.com (mail-ed1-x532.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::532]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BF02C061A0F for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 14:50:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x532.google.com with SMTP id w2so1735104edx.4 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 14:50:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paul-moore-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=h75aC48js8sKCCySKREoqNg0w2m9dpiweb5HMYIp2qA=; b=W/qz2Sgx8KY4IIKpyDOn4B/ruWdOXHsrsK8E4O0CqCcuXoJxG+6q5bWayuJ7iU5Q63 77Qm5zvHIGpP7JdrHlosyZk8VKrVrBzJiSpUqrcWLYwJrYHCbVNwOGt41rnF3lLupOoH 0mvv1uoZizrYe5rGWLjnB7muRCDBo5bAf4/C6evfGcjIMF42SvDMkKE5Ub9j5qPunPtR fHFl1ul85wFvt6L46gR0cASVYsEQ9gidkX4Uf5sw0xo6ndJ/aAAW68Lhn0wm7lrhiDgM EZ2riSRnn6cIltAUMzATpovGHEwtMsgPYBoPY7gAVEWlB2fhM4rMWxRfyhukC8g6SMlH 5Gfg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=h75aC48js8sKCCySKREoqNg0w2m9dpiweb5HMYIp2qA=; b=LQz3NjkLjLrsMwmEWrgwGgOYVSyiazSXMvUQEsPuBtshhiGKMrdx/HxxnnlCR9vNPU EFnb2bJgP8mSkJyykhImJinKj7sIo4ri+elG2Uqmhn4yJ0js1a4sHkPo5gdLOTGQm4rr wxwDydI/VH1DqBvpWRlt18bekQ7fwOyWVMAGGpa0v7oOY51I2n2Uz68ngbONFKQvZCVz JXAYui+VG9NlSlKv7EEeDhWRKfP0N4lLSCExVxixtKVo5mMTUv3deMibfMEc1o42RrAb 2Jteo9GKotsNq1OURXIudb197XZcG5RSN8/jRXXi7Ng3yjmRAKllnT5XeL+52OcWoOW/ 7bhw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0Pub/P3TsKAQoTTGSKSnfQujf34AmgALzEmSc6paOVuNSjOXE6RE3 8dj6eT7XRtyoSslotYpepjgxa4dIiLkmJHgYSjdv X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypI0aouWfIpTGMXISh790CWaIpd+XEJQb06iJoXpKToU3h+64hy2wBTAVA4ziaAHpFhnx69qP3t5Sl8Vd25GNw4= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c352:: with SMTP id j18mr4687235edr.196.1586901018782; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 14:50:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200408182416.30995-1-siarhei.liakh@concurrent-rt.com> <20200413204334.GA10584@concurrent-rt.com> In-Reply-To: <20200413204334.GA10584@concurrent-rt.com> From: Paul Moore Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 17:50:07 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] SELinux: Improve hash functions and sizing of hash tables To: Siarhei Liakh Cc: selinux@vger.kernel.org, colin.king@canonical.com, Eric Paris , gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jeffv@google.com, omosnace@redhat.com, Stephen Smalley , tglx@linutronix.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: selinux-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: selinux@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 4:43 PM Siarhei Liakh wrote: > Looks like I sent you a snapshot with a couple of minor porting errors before I > fixed them. You can still look at the patches since the errors do not change > the logic, just hold off on compiling. Apologies for the mix-up, I'll send out > another version soon. ... > I've got a Fedora 32 beta box installed, so I will get some benchmark numbers > for Linus' tree with default F32 policies soon. Okay, once you've got some updated numbers and a revised patchset we can revisit this. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com