From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>,
selinux@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] selinux: Assorted simplifications and cleanups
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 16:49:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <de3d7e3c-c37b-7051-f1ab-cb8e767cbfba@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHC9VhSGW9OwTPf1yHLea3oN6bRrpawsF4kSSgK1NkX9sXn5cQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 1/16/2020 3:59 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 6:09 PM Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
>> On 1/16/2020 4:04 AM, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
>>> This series contains some simplifications that I discovered while
>>> working on another patch. I believe they also save some run time
>>> (although not in any perf-critical paths) and some memory overhead.
>>>
>>> The first patch is a cleanup in security_load_policy()
>> It's a real nuisance that the security server code uses the
>> prefix "security_". If you're making significant changes in
>> the security server it would be really nice to clean up the
>> namespace collision.
> For all the people lurking on the mailing list reading Casey's
> response, *please* do not do this (without discussion). That change
> has the potential to wreck a development cycle.
Of course discussion is critical, and breaking a development cycle
would be a Bad Thing. I only suggested this because I'm seeing a bit
of clean-up I would consider to be in the same vein. I was not
advocating disruption. Carry on.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-17 0:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-16 12:04 [PATCH 0/6] selinux: Assorted simplifications and cleanups Ondrej Mosnacek
2020-01-16 12:04 ` [PATCH 1/6] selinux: do not allocate ancillary buffer on first load Ondrej Mosnacek
2020-01-16 16:02 ` Stephen Smalley
2020-01-16 16:18 ` Ondrej Mosnacek
2020-01-16 21:57 ` Paul Moore
2020-01-16 16:34 ` Stephen Smalley
2020-01-16 12:04 ` [PATCH 2/6] selinux: simplify security_preserve_bools() Ondrej Mosnacek
2020-01-16 16:42 ` Stephen Smalley
2020-01-16 22:28 ` Paul Moore
2020-01-16 12:04 ` [PATCH 3/6] selinux: convert cond_list to array Ondrej Mosnacek
2020-01-16 17:07 ` Stephen Smalley
2020-01-16 12:04 ` [PATCH 4/6] selinux: convert cond_av_list " Ondrej Mosnacek
2020-01-16 17:13 ` Stephen Smalley
2020-01-16 12:04 ` [PATCH 5/6] selinux: convert cond_expr " Ondrej Mosnacek
2020-01-16 17:17 ` Stephen Smalley
2020-01-16 12:04 ` [PATCH 6/6] selinux: generalize evaluate_cond_node() Ondrej Mosnacek
2020-01-16 17:18 ` Stephen Smalley
2020-01-16 23:09 ` [PATCH 0/6] selinux: Assorted simplifications and cleanups Casey Schaufler
2020-01-16 23:59 ` Paul Moore
2020-01-17 0:49 ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
2020-01-17 0:56 ` Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=de3d7e3c-c37b-7051-f1ab-cb8e767cbfba@schaufler-ca.com \
--to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=omosnace@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).