selinux.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Lautrbach <plautrba@redhat.com>
To: selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Petr Lautrbach <plautrba@redhat.com>,
	Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss@m4x.org>,
	Dan Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dbus: Fix name of polkit function
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 10:09:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <pjdmun8x8v1.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJfZ7=kYgvh3QeXBzWbMcjMuSKt1VaGkaxj=xiJ_0PFsihhPMQ@mail.gmail.com>


Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss@m4x.org> writes:

> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 8:42 PM Petr Lautrbach 
> <plautrba@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Dan Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Petr Lautrbach <plautrba@redhat.com>
>
> Hi,
> As I am unfamiliar with D-Bus code, I try to understand what is 
> the
> nature of this change (is-it a bugfix, an improvement, something
> else?). Here are the facts:
>
> - Currently, dbus/selinux_server.py uses «
> @slip.dbus.polkit.require_auth("org.selinux.change_default_mode") 
> »
> for function « change_default_mode ».
> - "org.selinux.change_default_mode" does not exist, and I do not 
> know
> whether that means that some kind of default policykit policy 
> gets
> applied.
> - "org.selinux.change_policy_type" is defined in
> dbus/org.selinux.policy, without any user.
> - The commit that introduced dbus/selinux_server.py (commit
> e6a1298e5421 ("These are massive changes involved in building 
> new
> GUI.")) added a function named « change_default_mode », without 
> any
> specific policykit access checking.
> - Commit e8718ef51463 ("Make sure we do the polkit check on all 
> dbus
> interfaces.") added «
> @slip.dbus.polkit.require_auth("org.selinux.change_default_mode") 
> » in
> policycoreutils/sepolicy/selinux_server.py.
>
> If I understand correctly, this last commit is buggy and should 
> have
> added "org.selinux.change_default_mode" to
> policycoreutils/sepolicy/org.selinux.policy. Therefore this new 
> patch
> fixes a bug and removes an unused policykit action. Is this 
> right? If
> yes, I suggest adding this to the commit description:
>
>     Add missing action org.selinux.change_default_mode for
> change_default_mode() and remove unused action
> org.selinux.change_policy_type.
>
>     Fixes: e8718ef51463 ("Make sure we do the polkit check on 
>     all dbus
> interfaces.")
>
> Would this be acceptable?

You are completely right and the new message makes sense. I'll 
resend
the patch with updated commit message.

Thanks!

>
>> ---
>>  dbus/org.selinux.policy | 6 +++---
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/dbus/org.selinux.policy b/dbus/org.selinux.policy
>> index 01266102..9772127b 100644
>> --- a/dbus/org.selinux.policy
>> +++ b/dbus/org.selinux.policy
>> @@ -70,9 +70,9 @@
>>           <allow_active>auth_admin_keep</allow_active>
>>          </defaults>
>>      </action>
>> -    <action id="org.selinux.change_policy_type">
>> -        <description>SELinux write access</description>
>> -        <message>System policy prevents change_policy_type 
>> access to SELinux</message>
>> +    <action id="org.selinux.change_default_mode">
>> +        <description>Change SELinux default enforcing 
>> mode</description>
>> +        <message>System policy prevents change_default_policy 
>> access to SELinux</message>
>>          <defaults>
>>            <allow_any>no</allow_any>
>>            <allow_inactive>no</allow_inactive>
>> --
>> 2.20.1
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-07  9:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-31 19:42 [PATCH] dbus: Fix name of polkit function Petr Lautrbach
2019-02-06 20:46 ` Nicolas Iooss
2019-02-07  9:09   ` Petr Lautrbach [this message]
2019-02-07  9:18     ` [PATCH v2] " Petr Lautrbach
2019-02-07 21:04       ` Nicolas Iooss
2019-02-10 16:49         ` Nicolas Iooss

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=pjdmun8x8v1.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=plautrba@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwalsh@redhat.com \
    --cc=nicolas.iooss@m4x.org \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).