From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2754DC432BE for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 17:05:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F419461074 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 17:05:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344256AbhIARGD (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Sep 2021 13:06:03 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:39898 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1346380AbhIARFW (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Sep 2021 13:05:22 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0B71042; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 10:04:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.14] (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 087883F694; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 10:04:21 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: About resctrl code rebase To: "tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com" List-Id: Cc: "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" , "'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org'" , "'soc@kernel.org'" , "'tony.luck@intel.com'" , "'arnd@arndb.de'" , "'will@kernel.org'" , "'catalin.marinas@arm.com'" , "'olof@lixom.net'" , "misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com" References: From: James Morse Message-ID: <97164928-e2d7-fd3f-e063-9174b028ed65@arm.com> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 18:04:20 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20210901170420.dELSIqzlOlPcKUMGvdxkVdMjN_kfIReIVyYPmoAI758@z> Hi Tan Shaopeng, On 01/09/2021 09:35, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com wrote: >> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's cache >> control function into resctrl. >> Fujitsu will implement this feature base >> on your rebased code. I think the commit of refactoring arch/x86 >> implementation of resctrl has been merged into the x86/cache branch. >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.tip-bot2@tip-bot2/ I'm afraid this was only a small part of it. I've also posted the next series here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210729223610.29373-1-james.morse@arm.com/ and there are a couple more after that. >> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move >> the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere. >> And where is the rebase code? >> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch? I will keep posting 'the next part' of the x86 changes once the earlier part is reviewed. (please help!) I can't push the latest branch until the ACPI spec is published, but I hope that will happen this month. > I'm afraid that my message may not have reached you. Yes, I'm horribly behind with email! Thanks, James