From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE9F5ECAAD8 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 18:17:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) id B52FCC433D7; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 18:17:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qt1-f177.google.com (mail-qt1-f177.google.com [209.85.160.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C195FC433C1 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 18:17:16 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 smtp.kernel.org C195FC433C1 Authentication-Results: smtp.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-qt1-f177.google.com with SMTP id g12so6913455qts.1 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 11:17:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=1SnYPOYWPXNRM2Psm7rj/ZZy/4CgkkceBm/2enTCC9U=; b=kScHmmvBQQeXEUoxKTYBLHOonsFqgth8+o3WQMQwdN+YZu5PkXbN9yUGeXQd/Uoaen ou+HDIkcebMZWz37Ij3VqywT+0ljJkxdWyYPHd7GFjBRsmpmfkdj3CatgU6YH84/avKU iXK2s46UaCJiEiNzaJ73jyvd3Yh7AIMt1ptBnGDPoW7gipMpr1+Uoslv9CVVPtajrcFL 68ZNfX19xJpg5RBhveqP5taX3BM8TtoAZ3zA1Ae7HvHJYLlLHjL1IsjsxzLWDuYlICN6 k1UbOA+zKgsnbTML41Eib94Mxwc3wqFVcp2zUS2PxmbLVp4uNk1gmD1aGcIE8klkS384 8Ymw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=1SnYPOYWPXNRM2Psm7rj/ZZy/4CgkkceBm/2enTCC9U=; b=cQSykv2SCGefgX/bY8LTlzUgYOTIG6ZOpJrosFZAzSzlpMNOu/EJDj4/NXa/3kKtl+ ivMyXzk2nIhEMrZMNNKQyfc57QVMyU1/TVv4XhLoTooaUkx6grdoAwDKW/MKvQVsyZP3 RV5DNxkvNXdt/ipyLSUDVnlCX04fzKGila3iGq+EwvayaAoNJJFHnLiUhTxdKh7WhtMO tt6rpyUvx8STGPAffOiL97Yl3g3xh2t3jXvTkvk/8QKDY8l8j2F9lfOztfyQmKRepF5H f1y43kQlSR8R+H33f4rjTfteQJ9QGd45JCGSUjJR/VRi5kGCkXUCc4I38Gzszr1VGlFW bxYA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1AYaLWZ/HVO8MuLwx11bmLo8sNEnRvq4q8JpinQSNIQj7WCJXA XeMvK5bkfKO32yWglr/5vJ3GGNxi1co= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4UtZoCgwhBcqHMe/T1MoOeSeqkKSdnQ24nY00Sf0kkYMUwS7O40wN8a3eP67aqz7mkjk2esg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1989:b0:35c:dd7a:4206 with SMTP id u9-20020a05622a198900b0035cdd7a4206mr4007735qtc.592.1663870635655; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 11:17:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.67.48.245] ([192.19.223.252]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id d18-20020ac851d2000000b00342fa1f4a10sm3807254qtn.61.2022.09.22.11.17.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 22 Sep 2022 11:17:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8c1c4506-bd21-a35e-d6e5-3c7897715c18@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 11:17:13 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: SoC fixes for 6.0-rc6 Content-Language: en-US To: Linus Torvalds List-Id: Cc: Arnd Bergmann , soc@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <87427dd0-7307-57b2-4008-2ffb839a099a@gmail.com> From: Florian Fainelli In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 9/22/22 11:13, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 10:19 AM Florian Fainelli wrote: >> >> In case Linus has not had a chance to pull it just yet, could you amend >> it? > > I did see this email, but as I expect to be AFK for the next few > hours, I took Arnd's pull request as-is. > > I could pull your Broadcom fixes directly on top if you/Arnd would > prefer that as a solution? Thanks for the offer, no real urgency on my side, if there is a -rc7, maybe Arnd can submit a follow up for ARM SoC fixes, as there is a good chance we will accumulate more of those between -rc6 and then. If not, and Arnd is fine with it, yes please pull mine directly, thanks! -- Florian