From: "misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com" <misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com>
To: "misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com" <misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com>,
"'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org'"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"'soc@kernel.org'" <soc@kernel.org>
Cc: "'will@kernel.org'" <will@kernel.org>,
"'catalin.marinas@arm.com'" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"'arnd@arndb.de'" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"'olof@lixom.net'" <olof@lixom.net>
Subject: RE:
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 10:35:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <OSBPR01MB4582E37CD189F2518355B128E5AE0@OSBPR01MB4582.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
Sorry, I failed to add proper subject to cover letter and it does not show lore archive.
I will resend the whole serieses. Plese discard this.
Tomohiro
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Sent: Friday, January 8, 2021 7:32 PM
> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; soc@kernel.org
> Cc: will@kernel.org; catalin.marinas@arm.com; arnd@arndb.de; olof@lixom.net; Misono, Tomohiro/味曽野 智礼
> <misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com>
> Subject:
>
> Subject: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Add Fujitsu A64FX soc entry/hardware barrier driver
>
> Hello,
>
> This series adds Fujitsu A64FX SoC entry in drivers/soc and hardware barrier driver for it.
>
> [Driver Description]
> A64FX CPU has several functions for HPC workload and hardware barrier is one of them. It is a mechanism to realize
> fast synchronization by PEs belonging to the same L3 cache domain by using implementation defined hardware
> registers.
> For more details, see A64FX HPC extension specification in https://github.com/fujitsu/A64FX
>
> The driver mainly offers a set of ioctls to manipulate related registers.
> Patch 1-9 implements driver code and patch 10 finally adds kconfig, Makefile and MAINTAINER entry for the driver.
>
> Also, C library and test program for this driver is available on:
> https://github.com/fujitsu/hardware_barrier
>
> The driver is based on v5.11-rc2 and tested on FX700 environment.
>
> [RFC]
> This is the first time we upstream drivers for our chip and I want to confirm driver location and patch submission
> process.
>
> Based on my observation it seems drivers/soc folder is right place to put this driver, so I added Kconfig entry for arm64
> platform config, created soc/fujitsu folder and updated MAINTAINER entry accordingly (last patch).
> Is it right?
>
> Also for final submission I think I need to 1) create some public git tree to push driver code (github or something), 2)
> make pull request to SOC team (soc@kernel.org). Is it a correct procedure?
>
> I will appreciate any help/comments.
>
> sidenote: We plan to post other drivers for A64FX HPC extension (prefetch control and cache control) too anytime soon.
>
> Misono Tomohiro (10):
> soc: fujitsu: hwb: Add hardware barrier driver init/exit code
> soc: fujtisu: hwb: Add open operation
> soc: fujitsu: hwb: Add IOC_BB_ALLOC ioctl
> soc: fujitsu: hwb: Add IOC_BW_ASSIGN ioctl
> soc: fujitsu: hwb: Add IOC_BW_UNASSIGN ioctl
> soc: fujitsu: hwb: Add IOC_BB_FREE ioctl
> soc: fujitsu: hwb: Add IOC_GET_PE_INFO ioctl
> soc: fujitsu: hwb: Add release operation
> soc: fujitsu: hwb: Add sysfs entry
> soc: fujitsu: hwb: Add Kconfig/Makefile to build fujitsu_hwb driver
>
> MAINTAINERS | 7 +
> arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms | 5 +
> drivers/soc/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/soc/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/soc/fujitsu/Kconfig | 24 +
> drivers/soc/fujitsu/Makefile | 2 +
> drivers/soc/fujitsu/fujitsu_hwb.c | 1253 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/uapi/linux/fujitsu_hpc_ioctl.h | 41 +
> 8 files changed, 1334 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/fujitsu/Kconfig create mode 100644 drivers/soc/fujitsu/Makefile create mode
> 100644 drivers/soc/fujitsu/fujitsu_hwb.c create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/fujitsu_hpc_ioctl.h
>
> --
> 2.26.2
next reply other threads:[~2021-01-08 10:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-08 10:35 misono.tomohiro [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-05-30 1:31 RE; Olena Shevchenko
2021-09-03 20:51 Mr. James Khmalo
2021-01-08 10:32 Misono Tomohiro
2021-01-08 12:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-01-08 12:30 ` Re: Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=OSBPR01MB4582E37CD189F2518355B128E5AE0@OSBPR01MB4582.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com \
--to=misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=soc@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).