soc.lore.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* About resctrl code rebase
@ 2021-08-19  5:14 tan.shaopeng
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: tan.shaopeng @ 2021-08-19  5:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'james.morse@arm.com'
  Cc: 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org',
	'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org',
	'soc@kernel.org', 'tony.luck@intel.com',
	'arnd@arndb.de', 'will@kernel.org',
	'catalin.marinas@arm.com', 'olof@lixom.net',
	misono.tomohiro

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 639 bytes --]

Hi, James Morse

As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's cache
control function into resctrl. Fujitsu will implement this feature base
on your rebased code. I think the commit of refactoring arch/x86
implementation of resctrl has been merged into the x86/cache branch.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.tip-bot2@tip-bot2/

I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move
the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere.
And where is the rebase code?
In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch?

Best regards,
Tan Shaopeng


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3895 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* RE: About resctrl code rebase
       [not found]       ` <20210906061907.zRxgWS4hpDpFAJYpGB0XapTra9BTfiqCe1FFEmEIhlc@z>
@ 2021-09-06  6:19         ` tan.shaopeng
  2021-09-06  6:19           ` tan.shaopeng
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: tan.shaopeng @ 2021-09-06  6:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'James Morse'
  Cc: 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org',
	'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org',
	'soc@kernel.org', 'tony.luck@intel.com',
	'arnd@arndb.de', 'will@kernel.org',
	'catalin.marinas@arm.com', 'olof@lixom.net',
	misono.tomohiro

Hi, James Morse

Thanks for your reply.

> On 01/09/2021 09:35, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com wrote:
> >> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's
> >> cache control function into resctrl.
> 
> >> Fujitsu will implement this feature base on your rebased code. I
> >> think the commit of refactoring arch/x86 implementation of resctrl
> >> has been merged into the x86/cache branch.
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.ti
> >> p-bot2@tip-bot2/
> 
> I'm afraid this was only a small part of it.
> 
> I've also posted the next series here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210729223610.29373-1-james.morse@arm.com
> /
> 
> and there are a couple more after that.

I understand.
 
> >> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move
> >> the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere.
> >> And where is the rebase code?
> >> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch?
> 
> I will keep posting 'the next part' of the x86 changes once the earlier part is
> reviewed.
> (please help!)

I will check these patches.
And I'm going to test these patches on machine with x86. 

Best regards,
Tan Shaopeng

> I can't push the latest branch until the ACPI spec is published, but I hope that
> will happen this month.
> 
> 
> > I'm afraid that my message may not have reached you.
> 
> Yes, I'm horribly behind with email!


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* RE: About resctrl code rebase
  2021-09-06  6:19         ` tan.shaopeng
@ 2021-09-06  6:19           ` tan.shaopeng
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: tan.shaopeng @ 2021-09-06  6:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'James Morse'
  Cc: 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org',
	'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org',
	'soc@kernel.org', 'tony.luck@intel.com',
	'arnd@arndb.de', 'will@kernel.org',
	'catalin.marinas@arm.com', 'olof@lixom.net',
	misono.tomohiro

Hi, James Morse

Thanks for your reply.

> On 01/09/2021 09:35, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com wrote:
> >> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's
> >> cache control function into resctrl.
> 
> >> Fujitsu will implement this feature base on your rebased code. I
> >> think the commit of refactoring arch/x86 implementation of resctrl
> >> has been merged into the x86/cache branch.
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.ti
> >> p-bot2@tip-bot2/
> 
> I'm afraid this was only a small part of it.
> 
> I've also posted the next series here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210729223610.29373-1-james.morse@arm.com
> /
> 
> and there are a couple more after that.

I understand.
 
> >> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move
> >> the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere.
> >> And where is the rebase code?
> >> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch?
> 
> I will keep posting 'the next part' of the x86 changes once the earlier part is
> reviewed.
> (please help!)

I will check these patches.
And I'm going to test these patches on machine with x86. 

Best regards,
Tan Shaopeng

> I can't push the latest branch until the ACPI spec is published, but I hope that
> will happen this month.
> 
> 
> > I'm afraid that my message may not have reached you.
> 
> Yes, I'm horribly behind with email!


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: About resctrl code rebase
       [not found]   ` <20210901170420.65KFdDatm7mKlrWIB5eDJIuh9nXnVk_MIyBoAWWLMxs@z>
@ 2021-09-01 17:04     ` James Morse
  2021-09-01 17:04       ` James Morse
       [not found]       ` <20210906061907.zRxgWS4hpDpFAJYpGB0XapTra9BTfiqCe1FFEmEIhlc@z>
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: James Morse @ 2021-09-01 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: tan.shaopeng
  Cc: 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org',
	'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org',
	'soc@kernel.org', 'tony.luck@intel.com',
	'arnd@arndb.de', 'will@kernel.org',
	'catalin.marinas@arm.com', 'olof@lixom.net',
	misono.tomohiro

Hi Tan Shaopeng,

On 01/09/2021 09:35, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com wrote:
>> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's cache 
>> control function into resctrl.

>> Fujitsu will implement this feature base
>> on your rebased code. I think the commit of refactoring arch/x86 
>> implementation of resctrl has been merged into the x86/cache branch. 
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.tip-bot2@tip-bot2/ 

I'm afraid this was only a small part of it.

I've also posted the next series here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210729223610.29373-1-james.morse@arm.com/

and there are a couple more after that.


>> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move 
>> the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere. 
>> And where is the rebase code? 
>> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch?

I will keep posting 'the next part' of the x86 changes once the earlier part is reviewed.
(please help!)

I can't push the latest branch until the ACPI spec is published, but I hope that will
happen this month.


> I'm afraid that my message may not have reached you.

Yes, I'm horribly behind with email!


Thanks,

James

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: About resctrl code rebase
  2021-09-01 17:04     ` James Morse
@ 2021-09-01 17:04       ` James Morse
       [not found]       ` <20210906061907.zRxgWS4hpDpFAJYpGB0XapTra9BTfiqCe1FFEmEIhlc@z>
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: James Morse @ 2021-09-01 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: tan.shaopeng
  Cc: 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org',
	'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org',
	'soc@kernel.org', 'tony.luck@intel.com',
	'arnd@arndb.de', 'will@kernel.org',
	'catalin.marinas@arm.com', 'olof@lixom.net',
	misono.tomohiro

Hi Tan Shaopeng,

On 01/09/2021 09:35, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com wrote:
>> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's cache 
>> control function into resctrl.

>> Fujitsu will implement this feature base
>> on your rebased code. I think the commit of refactoring arch/x86 
>> implementation of resctrl has been merged into the x86/cache branch. 
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.tip-bot2@tip-bot2/ 

I'm afraid this was only a small part of it.

I've also posted the next series here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210729223610.29373-1-james.morse@arm.com/

and there are a couple more after that.


>> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move 
>> the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere. 
>> And where is the rebase code? 
>> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch?

I will keep posting 'the next part' of the x86 changes once the earlier part is reviewed.
(please help!)

I can't push the latest branch until the ACPI spec is published, but I hope that will
happen this month.


> I'm afraid that my message may not have reached you.

Yes, I'm horribly behind with email!


Thanks,

James

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* RE: About resctrl code rebase
       [not found] <20210901083516.Qzs5LSr3ZkgfJT5t1XFyf14HW7R1F3jCzWy7uCnDETY@z>
@ 2021-09-01  8:35 ` tan.shaopeng
       [not found]   ` <20210901170420.65KFdDatm7mKlrWIB5eDJIuh9nXnVk_MIyBoAWWLMxs@z>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: tan.shaopeng @ 2021-09-01  8:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'james.morse@arm.com'
  Cc: 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org',
	'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org',
	'soc@kernel.org', 'tony.luck@intel.com',
	'arnd@arndb.de', 'will@kernel.org',
	'catalin.marinas@arm.com', 'olof@lixom.net',
	misono.tomohiro

Hi, James Morse

> As you known, Fujitsu is implementing a feature that add A64FX's cache 
> control function into resctrl. Fujitsu will implement this feature base
> on your rebased code. I think the commit of refactoring arch/x86 
> implementation of resctrl has been merged into the x86/cache branch. 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/162871088112.395.12879267279872673224.tip-bot2@tip-bot2/ 

> I would like to know whether you have rebased these codes that move 
> the common parts of multiple architectures to somewhere. 
> And where is the rebase code? 
> In addition, when will you release the latest MPAM patch?
I'm afraid that my message may not have reached you.
I look forward to hearing from you.

Best regards,
Tan Shaopeng

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-09-06  6:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-08-19  5:14 About resctrl code rebase tan.shaopeng
     [not found] <20210901083516.Qzs5LSr3ZkgfJT5t1XFyf14HW7R1F3jCzWy7uCnDETY@z>
2021-09-01  8:35 ` tan.shaopeng
     [not found]   ` <20210901170420.65KFdDatm7mKlrWIB5eDJIuh9nXnVk_MIyBoAWWLMxs@z>
2021-09-01 17:04     ` James Morse
2021-09-01 17:04       ` James Morse
     [not found]       ` <20210906061907.zRxgWS4hpDpFAJYpGB0XapTra9BTfiqCe1FFEmEIhlc@z>
2021-09-06  6:19         ` tan.shaopeng
2021-09-06  6:19           ` tan.shaopeng

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).