From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC312C433EF for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 07:41:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B41561156 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 07:41:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230264AbhIUHnX (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Sep 2021 03:43:23 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:55373 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230172AbhIUHnX (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Sep 2021 03:43:23 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 50DBA67373; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 09:41:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 09:41:51 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: Christoph Hellwig , "David S. Miller" , Andreas Larsson , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sparc32: remove dma_make_coherent Message-ID: <20210921074151.GA26525@lst.de> References: <20210920113108.1299996-1-hch@lst.de> <20210920113108.1299996-2-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 06:07:16PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 01:31:07PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > LEON only needs snooping when DMA accesses are not seen on the processor > > bus. Given that coherent allocations are mapped uncached this can't > > happen for those, so open code the d-cache flushing logic in the only > > remaing place that needs it, arch_sync_dma_for_cpu. > I do not see this change explicitly explained in the changelog. > Is this not one of the "only remaining place that needs it"? Yes. Two callers, one needs it, one doesn't. > Would be nice to see it explicitly mentioned. Ok. I'll respin with a more detailed commit log.