From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: ndesaulniers@google.com, peterz@infradead.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, vaibhavrustagi@google.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] x86/purgatory: Use CFLAGS_REMOVE rather than reset" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 20:40:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <156572162865148@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From b059f801a937d164e03b33c1848bb3dca67c0b04 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 15:15:33 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] x86/purgatory: Use CFLAGS_REMOVE rather than reset
KBUILD_CFLAGS
KBUILD_CFLAGS is very carefully built up in the top level Makefile,
particularly when cross compiling or using different build tools.
Resetting KBUILD_CFLAGS via := assignment is an antipattern.
The comment above the reset mentions that -pg is problematic. Other
Makefiles use `CFLAGS_REMOVE_file.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)` when
CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER is set. Prefer that pattern to wiping out all of
the important KBUILD_CFLAGS then manually having to re-add them. Seems
also that __stack_chk_fail references are generated when using
CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR or CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG.
Fixes: 8fc5b4d4121c ("purgatory: core purgatory functionality")
Reported-by: Vaibhav Rustagi <vaibhavrustagi@google.com>
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Vaibhav Rustagi <vaibhavrustagi@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190807221539.94583-2-ndesaulniers@google.com
diff --git a/arch/x86/purgatory/Makefile b/arch/x86/purgatory/Makefile
index 91ef244026d2..8901a1f89cf5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/purgatory/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/purgatory/Makefile
@@ -20,11 +20,34 @@ KCOV_INSTRUMENT := n
# Default KBUILD_CFLAGS can have -pg option set when FTRACE is enabled. That
# in turn leaves some undefined symbols like __fentry__ in purgatory and not
-# sure how to relocate those. Like kexec-tools, use custom flags.
-
-KBUILD_CFLAGS := -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -fno-zero-initialized-in-bss -fno-builtin -ffreestanding -c -Os -mcmodel=large
-KBUILD_CFLAGS += -m$(BITS)
-KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-fno-PIE)
+# sure how to relocate those.
+ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER
+CFLAGS_REMOVE_sha256.o += $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
+CFLAGS_REMOVE_purgatory.o += $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
+CFLAGS_REMOVE_string.o += $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
+CFLAGS_REMOVE_kexec-purgatory.o += $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
+endif
+
+ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR
+CFLAGS_REMOVE_sha256.o += -fstack-protector
+CFLAGS_REMOVE_purgatory.o += -fstack-protector
+CFLAGS_REMOVE_string.o += -fstack-protector
+CFLAGS_REMOVE_kexec-purgatory.o += -fstack-protector
+endif
+
+ifdef CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG
+CFLAGS_REMOVE_sha256.o += -fstack-protector-strong
+CFLAGS_REMOVE_purgatory.o += -fstack-protector-strong
+CFLAGS_REMOVE_string.o += -fstack-protector-strong
+CFLAGS_REMOVE_kexec-purgatory.o += -fstack-protector-strong
+endif
+
+ifdef CONFIG_RETPOLINE
+CFLAGS_REMOVE_sha256.o += $(RETPOLINE_CFLAGS)
+CFLAGS_REMOVE_purgatory.o += $(RETPOLINE_CFLAGS)
+CFLAGS_REMOVE_string.o += $(RETPOLINE_CFLAGS)
+CFLAGS_REMOVE_kexec-purgatory.o += $(RETPOLINE_CFLAGS)
+endif
$(obj)/purgatory.ro: $(PURGATORY_OBJS) FORCE
$(call if_changed,ld)
reply other threads:[~2019-08-13 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=156572162865148@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vaibhavrustagi@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).