From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5400C433E0 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 23:37:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC0702078A for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 23:37:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1593473868; bh=jwY2o3i7A/yilz2MIuZg3u9zREXVh4++QwAfajlJ9l4=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:List-ID:From; b=L5PcncmiX4ixUqX65pCR3xUUTvZSRL5ekckKvaeEJBJBZzNhLLUDxA0xj9pGSXqIm XA2eXxmECBnSmMP585+8Me8VehY61WTzZ0MUxWOLODL5rsWoV3KTHUwIq4QiFt62sd A42v8T9wKpknExAt8Rd+FF1eQRG2fL6ih0DScYXI= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728140AbgF2Xhs (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 19:37:48 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:47338 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726596AbgF2Xhr (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2020 19:37:47 -0400 Received: from kernel.org (unknown [104.132.0.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8D59C206F1; Mon, 29 Jun 2020 23:37:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1593473867; bh=jwY2o3i7A/yilz2MIuZg3u9zREXVh4++QwAfajlJ9l4=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=QnKqIkK1Mtx4Lx4nmaKwHDuiOd0k9+8ngFNH1vIGu8nJpMDUEN7dZg5OVCz6DCWU3 RZ5vFPXRwWRSNN6WKEgVJvW0r4AeJyj3qRbFmjNf9elEMd1pEa791bd0d+v1e3TdiD GsJ7ELoqXLrhZ2QhtSAXrXUW6ARFVFfOQxFADq4s= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: sifive: allocate sufficient memory for struct __prci_data From: Stephen Boyd Cc: vincent.chen@sifive.com, mturquette@baylibre.com, Paul Walmsley , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, schwab@suse.de, vincent.chen@sifive.com, stable@vger.kernel.org To: Palmer Dabbelt Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 16:37:46 -0700 Message-ID: <159347386681.1987609.8025910491933969394@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> User-Agent: alot/0.9 Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org Quoting Palmer Dabbelt (2020-06-29 16:34:10) > On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 16:23:47 PDT (-0700), sboyd@kernel.org wrote: > > > > Does that mean applied to sifive tree? I see it in next but only noticed > > this by chance because it wasn't sent to the linux-clk mailing list. >=20 > Sorry, I was going a bit too fast and didn't realize this wasn't in arch/= riscv/ > so I didn't wait for an ack. I put it on my fixes branch, which is what = I sent > for the RCs. That's merged into linux-next as well, as far as I understa= nd > that's the normal way to do things. It ended up in Linus' tree as d0a5fd= f4cc83 > ("clk: sifive: allocate sufficient memory for struct __prci_data"), which= is in > rc3. >=20 > We don't really have a SiFive tree, the SiFive stuff just goes in through= the > RISC-V tree. In theory I've been meaning to split them up for a while, b= ut > given the maintainers are the same I just never got around to doing so. >=20 > LMK if I screwed something up. No worries. I would have noticed this patch earlier if it had been sent to the linux-clk mailing list which I use to catch patches that should be reviewed for the clk tree. I'm not overly concerned. Thanks.