[PATCH] usb: hub: Fix usb enumeration issue due to address0 race

[PATCH] usb: hub: Fix usb enumeration issue due to address0 race

[Mathias Nyman]

xHC hardware can only have one slot in default state with address 0
waiting for a unique address at a time, otherwise "undefined behavior
may occur" according to xhci spec 5.4.3.4

The address0_mutex exists to prevent this across both xhci roothubs.

If hub_port_init() fails, it may unlock the mutex and exit with a xhci
slot in default state. If the other xhci roothub calls hub_port_init()
at this point we end up with two slots in default state.

Make sure the address0_mutex protects the slot default state across
hub_port_init() retries, until slot is addressed or disabled.

Note, one known minor case is not fixed by this patch.
If device needs to be reset during resume, but fails all hub_port_init()
retries in usb_reset_and_verify_device(), then it's possible the slot is
still left in default state when address0_mutex is unlocked.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 14 +++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
index 86658a81d284..00c3506324e4 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
@@ -4700,8 +4700,6 @@ hub_port_init(struct usb_hub *hub, struct usb_device *udev, int port1,
 	if (oldspeed == USB_SPEED_LOW)
 		delay = HUB_LONG_RESET_TIME;
 
-	mutex_lock(hcd->address0_mutex);
-
 	/* Reset the device; full speed may morph to high speed */
 	/* FIXME a USB 2.0 device may morph into SuperSpeed on reset. */
 	retval = hub_port_reset(hub, port1, udev, delay, false);
@@ -5016,7 +5014,6 @@ hub_port_init(struct usb_hub *hub, struct usb_device *udev, int port1,
 		hub_port_disable(hub, port1, 0);
 		update_devnum(udev, devnum);	/* for disconnect processing */
 	}
-	mutex_unlock(hcd->address0_mutex);
 	return retval;
 }
 
@@ -5246,6 +5243,9 @@ static void hub_port_connect(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1, u16 portstatus,
 		unit_load = 100;
 
 	status = 0;
+
+	mutex_lock(hcd->address0_mutex);
+
 	for (i = 0; i < PORT_INIT_TRIES; i++) {
 
 		/* reallocate for each attempt, since references
@@ -5282,6 +5282,8 @@ static void hub_port_connect(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1, u16 portstatus,
 		if (status < 0)
 			goto loop;
 
+		mutex_unlock(hcd->address0_mutex);
+
 		if (udev->quirks & USB_QUIRK_DELAY_INIT)
 			msleep(2000);
 
@@ -5370,6 +5372,7 @@ static void hub_port_connect(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1, u16 portstatus,
 
 loop_disable:
 		hub_port_disable(hub, port1, 1);
+		mutex_lock(hcd->address0_mutex);
 loop:
 		usb_ep0_reinit(udev);
 		release_devnum(udev);
@@ -5396,6 +5399,8 @@ static void hub_port_connect(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1, u16 portstatus,
 	}
 
 done:
+	mutex_unlock(hcd->address0_mutex);
+
 	hub_port_disable(hub, port1, 1);
 	if (hcd->driver->relinquish_port && !hub->hdev->parent) {
 		if (status != -ENOTCONN && status != -ENODEV)
@@ -5915,6 +5920,8 @@ static int usb_reset_and_verify_device(struct usb_device *udev)
 	bos = udev->bos;
 	udev->bos = NULL;
 
+	mutex_lock(hcd->address0_mutex);
+
 	for (i = 0; i < PORT_INIT_TRIES; ++i) {
 
 		/* ep0 maxpacket size may change; let the HCD know about it.
@@ -5924,6 +5931,7 @@ static int usb_reset_and_verify_device(struct usb_device *udev)
 		if (ret >= 0 || ret == -ENOTCONN || ret == -ENODEV)
 			break;
 	}
+	mutex_unlock(hcd->address0_mutex);
 
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto re_enumerate;
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH] usb: hub: Fix usb enumeration issue due to address0 race

[Greg KH]

On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 12:16:30AM +0200, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> xHC hardware can only have one slot in default state with address 0
> waiting for a unique address at a time, otherwise "undefined behavior
> may occur" according to xhci spec 5.4.3.4
> 
> The address0_mutex exists to prevent this across both xhci roothubs.
> 
> If hub_port_init() fails, it may unlock the mutex and exit with a xhci
> slot in default state. If the other xhci roothub calls hub_port_init()
> at this point we end up with two slots in default state.
> 
> Make sure the address0_mutex protects the slot default state across
> hub_port_init() retries, until slot is addressed or disabled.
> 
> Note, one known minor case is not fixed by this patch.
> If device needs to be reset during resume, but fails all hub_port_init()
> retries in usb_reset_and_verify_device(), then it's possible the slot is
> still left in default state when address0_mutex is unlocked.
> 
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>

What commit id does this "fix"?

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH] usb: hub: Fix usb enumeration issue due to address0 race

[Mathias Nyman]

On 16.11.2021 10.22, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 12:16:30AM +0200, Mathias Nyman wrote:
>> xHC hardware can only have one slot in default state with address 0
>> waiting for a unique address at a time, otherwise "undefined behavior
>> may occur" according to xhci spec 5.4.3.4
>>
>> The address0_mutex exists to prevent this across both xhci roothubs.
>>
>> If hub_port_init() fails, it may unlock the mutex and exit with a xhci
>> slot in default state. If the other xhci roothub calls hub_port_init()
>> at this point we end up with two slots in default state.
>>
>> Make sure the address0_mutex protects the slot default state across
>> hub_port_init() retries, until slot is addressed or disabled.
>>
>> Note, one known minor case is not fixed by this patch.
>> If device needs to be reset during resume, but fails all hub_port_init()
>> retries in usb_reset_and_verify_device(), then it's possible the slot is
>> still left in default state when address0_mutex is unlocked.
>>
>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
> 
> What commit id does this "fix"?
> 

Looks like original cause could be:
638139eb95d2 ("usb: hub: allow to process more usb hub events in parallel")

which was partially fixed in 4.7 by:
feb26ac31a2a ("usb: core: hub: hub_port_init lock controller instead of bus")

And now improved by this patch 

-Mathias

Re: [PATCH] usb: hub: Fix usb enumeration issue due to address0 race

[Marek Szyprowski]

Hi,

On 15.11.2021 23:16, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> xHC hardware can only have one slot in default state with address 0
> waiting for a unique address at a time, otherwise "undefined behavior
> may occur" according to xhci spec 5.4.3.4
>
> The address0_mutex exists to prevent this across both xhci roothubs.
>
> If hub_port_init() fails, it may unlock the mutex and exit with a xhci
> slot in default state. If the other xhci roothub calls hub_port_init()
> at this point we end up with two slots in default state.
>
> Make sure the address0_mutex protects the slot default state across
> hub_port_init() retries, until slot is addressed or disabled.
>
> Note, one known minor case is not fixed by this patch.
> If device needs to be reset during resume, but fails all hub_port_init()
> retries in usb_reset_and_verify_device(), then it's possible the slot is
> still left in default state when address0_mutex is unlocked.
>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>

This patch landed in linux next-20211118 as commit 6ae6dc22d2d1 ("usb: 
hub: Fix usb enumeration issue due to address0 race"). On my test 
systems it triggers the following deplock warning during system 
suspend/resume cycle:

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.16.0-rc1-00014-g6ae6dc22d2d1 #4126 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/u16:8/738 is trying to acquire lock:
cf81f738 (hcd->address0_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: 
usb_reset_and_verify_device+0xe8/0x3e4

but task is already holding lock:
cf80ab3c (&port_dev->status_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: 
usb_port_resume+0xa0/0x7e8

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&port_dev->status_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
        mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
        hub_event+0x824/0x1758
        process_one_work+0x2c8/0x7ec
        worker_thread+0x50/0x584
        kthread+0x13c/0x19c
        ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c
        0x0

-> #0 (hcd->address0_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
        lock_acquire+0x2a0/0x42c
        __mutex_lock+0x94/0xaa8
        mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
        usb_reset_and_verify_device+0xe8/0x3e4
        usb_port_resume+0x4e0/0x7e8
        usb_generic_driver_resume+0x18/0x40
        usb_resume_both+0x120/0x164
        usb_resume+0x14/0x60
        usb_dev_resume+0xc/0x10
        dpm_run_callback+0x98/0x32c
        device_resume+0xb4/0x258
        async_resume+0x20/0x64
        async_run_entry_fn+0x40/0x15c
        process_one_work+0x2c8/0x7ec
        worker_thread+0x50/0x584
        kthread+0x13c/0x19c
        ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c
        0x0

other info that might help us debug this:

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(&port_dev->status_lock);
                                lock(hcd->address0_mutex);
lock(&port_dev->status_lock);
   lock(hcd->address0_mutex);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

4 locks held by kworker/u16:8/738:
  #0: c1c08ca8 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: 
process_one_work+0x21c/0x7ec
  #1: cd9cff18 ((work_completion)(&entry->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: 
process_one_work+0x21c/0x7ec
  #2: cf810148 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_resume+0x60/0x258
  #3: cf80ab3c (&port_dev->status_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: 
usb_port_resume+0xa0/0x7e8

stack backtrace:
CPU: 4 PID: 738 Comm: kworker/u16:8 Not tainted 
5.16.0-rc1-00014-g6ae6dc22d2d1 #4126
Hardware name: Samsung Exynos (Flattened Device Tree)
Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
[<c01110d0>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010cab8>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[<c010cab8>] (show_stack) from [<c0b7427c>] (dump_stack_lvl+0x58/0x70)
[<c0b7427c>] (dump_stack_lvl) from [<c0192958>] 
(check_noncircular+0x144/0x15c)
[<c0192958>] (check_noncircular) from [<c0195e68>] 
(__lock_acquire+0x17e4/0x3180)
[<c0195e68>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c01983ec>] (lock_acquire+0x2a0/0x42c)
[<c01983ec>] (lock_acquire) from [<c0b7ba80>] (__mutex_lock+0x94/0xaa8)
[<c0b7ba80>] (__mutex_lock) from [<c0b7c4b0>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24)
[<c0b7c4b0>] (mutex_lock_nested) from [<c077bf9c>] 
(usb_reset_and_verify_device+0xe8/0x3e4)
[<c077bf9c>] (usb_reset_and_verify_device) from [<c077e79c>] 
(usb_port_resume+0x4e0/0x7e8)
[<c077e79c>] (usb_port_resume) from [<c07941f0>] 
(usb_generic_driver_resume+0x18/0x40)
[<c07941f0>] (usb_generic_driver_resume) from [<c0789a40>] 
(usb_resume_both+0x120/0x164)
[<c0789a40>] (usb_resume_both) from [<c078a854>] (usb_resume+0x14/0x60)
[<c078a854>] (usb_resume) from [<c0777fa0>] (usb_dev_resume+0xc/0x10)
[<c0777fa0>] (usb_dev_resume) from [<c06ca1b8>] 
(dpm_run_callback+0x98/0x32c)
[<c06ca1b8>] (dpm_run_callback) from [<c06ca500>] (device_resume+0xb4/0x258)
[<c06ca500>] (device_resume) from [<c06ca6c4>] (async_resume+0x20/0x64)
[<c06ca6c4>] (async_resume) from [<c01548bc>] 
(async_run_entry_fn+0x40/0x15c)
[<c01548bc>] (async_run_entry_fn) from [<c0148a68>] 
(process_one_work+0x2c8/0x7ec)
[<c0148a68>] (process_one_work) from [<c0148fdc>] (worker_thread+0x50/0x584)
[<c0148fdc>] (worker_thread) from [<c0151274>] (kthread+0x13c/0x19c)
[<c0151274>] (kthread) from [<c0100108>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c)
Exception stack(0xcd9cffb0 to 0xcd9cfff8)
ffa0:                                     00000000 00000000 00000000 
00000000
ffc0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 
00000000
ffe0: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000013 00000000
usb 1-1: reset high-speed USB device number 2 using exynos-ehci
usb 1-1.1: reset high-speed USB device number 3 using exynos-ehci
usb usb3: root hub lost power or was reset
usb usb4: root hub lost power or was reset
s3c-rtc 101e0000.rtc: rtc disabled, re-enabling
smsc95xx 1-1.1:1.0 eth0: Link is Down
OOM killer enabled.
Restarting tasks ... done.
PM: suspend exit

Reverting it on top of next-20211118 fixes/hides this warning. Let me 
know if I can help somehow fixing this issue.

> ---
>   drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 14 +++++++++++---
>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> index 86658a81d284..00c3506324e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> @@ -4700,8 +4700,6 @@ hub_port_init(struct usb_hub *hub, struct usb_device *udev, int port1,
>   	if (oldspeed == USB_SPEED_LOW)
>   		delay = HUB_LONG_RESET_TIME;
>   
> -	mutex_lock(hcd->address0_mutex);
> -
>   	/* Reset the device; full speed may morph to high speed */
>   	/* FIXME a USB 2.0 device may morph into SuperSpeed on reset. */
>   	retval = hub_port_reset(hub, port1, udev, delay, false);
> @@ -5016,7 +5014,6 @@ hub_port_init(struct usb_hub *hub, struct usb_device *udev, int port1,
>   		hub_port_disable(hub, port1, 0);
>   		update_devnum(udev, devnum);	/* for disconnect processing */
>   	}
> -	mutex_unlock(hcd->address0_mutex);
>   	return retval;
>   }
>   
> @@ -5246,6 +5243,9 @@ static void hub_port_connect(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1, u16 portstatus,
>   		unit_load = 100;
>   
>   	status = 0;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(hcd->address0_mutex);
> +
>   	for (i = 0; i < PORT_INIT_TRIES; i++) {
>   
>   		/* reallocate for each attempt, since references
> @@ -5282,6 +5282,8 @@ static void hub_port_connect(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1, u16 portstatus,
>   		if (status < 0)
>   			goto loop;
>   
> +		mutex_unlock(hcd->address0_mutex);
> +
>   		if (udev->quirks & USB_QUIRK_DELAY_INIT)
>   			msleep(2000);
>   
> @@ -5370,6 +5372,7 @@ static void hub_port_connect(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1, u16 portstatus,
>   
>   loop_disable:
>   		hub_port_disable(hub, port1, 1);
> +		mutex_lock(hcd->address0_mutex);
>   loop:
>   		usb_ep0_reinit(udev);
>   		release_devnum(udev);
> @@ -5396,6 +5399,8 @@ static void hub_port_connect(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1, u16 portstatus,
>   	}
>   
>   done:
> +	mutex_unlock(hcd->address0_mutex);
> +
>   	hub_port_disable(hub, port1, 1);
>   	if (hcd->driver->relinquish_port && !hub->hdev->parent) {
>   		if (status != -ENOTCONN && status != -ENODEV)
> @@ -5915,6 +5920,8 @@ static int usb_reset_and_verify_device(struct usb_device *udev)
>   	bos = udev->bos;
>   	udev->bos = NULL;
>   
> +	mutex_lock(hcd->address0_mutex);
> +
>   	for (i = 0; i < PORT_INIT_TRIES; ++i) {
>   
>   		/* ep0 maxpacket size may change; let the HCD know about it.
> @@ -5924,6 +5931,7 @@ static int usb_reset_and_verify_device(struct usb_device *udev)
>   		if (ret >= 0 || ret == -ENOTCONN || ret == -ENODEV)
>   			break;
>   	}
> +	mutex_unlock(hcd->address0_mutex);
>   
>   	if (ret < 0)
>   		goto re_enumerate;

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland

Re: [PATCH] usb: hub: Fix usb enumeration issue due to address0 race

[Mathias Nyman]

On 18.11.2021 13.19, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 15.11.2021 23:16, Mathias Nyman wrote:
>> xHC hardware can only have one slot in default state with address 0
>> waiting for a unique address at a time, otherwise "undefined behavior
>> may occur" according to xhci spec 5.4.3.4
>>
>> The address0_mutex exists to prevent this across both xhci roothubs.
>>
>> If hub_port_init() fails, it may unlock the mutex and exit with a xhci
>> slot in default state. If the other xhci roothub calls hub_port_init()
>> at this point we end up with two slots in default state.
>>
>> Make sure the address0_mutex protects the slot default state across
>> hub_port_init() retries, until slot is addressed or disabled.
>>
>> Note, one known minor case is not fixed by this patch.
>> If device needs to be reset during resume, but fails all hub_port_init()
>> retries in usb_reset_and_verify_device(), then it's possible the slot is
>> still left in default state when address0_mutex is unlocked.
>>
>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
> 
> This patch landed in linux next-20211118 as commit 6ae6dc22d2d1 ("usb: 
> hub: Fix usb enumeration issue due to address0 race"). On my test 
> systems it triggers the following deplock warning during system 
> suspend/resume cycle:
> 
> ======================================================
> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> 5.16.0-rc1-00014-g6ae6dc22d2d1 #4126 Not tainted
> ------------------------------------------------------
> kworker/u16:8/738 is trying to acquire lock:
> cf81f738 (hcd->address0_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: 
> usb_reset_and_verify_device+0xe8/0x3e4
> 
> but task is already holding lock:
> cf80ab3c (&port_dev->status_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: 
> usb_port_resume+0xa0/0x7e8
> 

Thanks, I see it now.

Lock order is:
  mutex_lock(&port_dev->status_lock)
    mutex_lock(hcd->address0_mutex)
    mutex_unlock(hcd->address0_mutex)
  mutex_unlock(&port_dev->status_lock)
in hub_port_connect(), usb_port_resume() and usb_reset_device()

But patch changed the status_lock and address0_mutex lock order in hub_port_connect().
Lets see if we can take the status_lock a bit earlier in hub_port_connect() to
solve this.

-Mathias

Re: [PATCH] usb: hub: Fix usb enumeration issue due to address0 race

[Mathias Nyman]

On 18.11.2021 15.50, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> On 18.11.2021 13.19, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 15.11.2021 23:16, Mathias Nyman wrote:
>>> xHC hardware can only have one slot in default state with address 0
>>> waiting for a unique address at a time, otherwise "undefined behavior
>>> may occur" according to xhci spec 5.4.3.4
>>>
>>> The address0_mutex exists to prevent this across both xhci roothubs.
>>>
>>> If hub_port_init() fails, it may unlock the mutex and exit with a xhci
>>> slot in default state. If the other xhci roothub calls hub_port_init()
>>> at this point we end up with two slots in default state.
>>>
>>> Make sure the address0_mutex protects the slot default state across
>>> hub_port_init() retries, until slot is addressed or disabled.
>>>
>>> Note, one known minor case is not fixed by this patch.
>>> If device needs to be reset during resume, but fails all hub_port_init()
>>> retries in usb_reset_and_verify_device(), then it's possible the slot is
>>> still left in default state when address0_mutex is unlocked.
>>>
>>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> This patch landed in linux next-20211118 as commit 6ae6dc22d2d1 ("usb: 
>> hub: Fix usb enumeration issue due to address0 race"). On my test 
>> systems it triggers the following deplock warning during system 
>> suspend/resume cycle:
>>
>> ======================================================
>> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
>> 5.16.0-rc1-00014-g6ae6dc22d2d1 #4126 Not tainted
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> kworker/u16:8/738 is trying to acquire lock:
>> cf81f738 (hcd->address0_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: 
>> usb_reset_and_verify_device+0xe8/0x3e4
>>
>> but task is already holding lock:
>> cf80ab3c (&port_dev->status_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: 
>> usb_port_resume+0xa0/0x7e8
>>
> 
> Thanks, I see it now.
> 
> Lock order is:
>   mutex_lock(&port_dev->status_lock)
>     mutex_lock(hcd->address0_mutex)
>     mutex_unlock(hcd->address0_mutex)
>   mutex_unlock(&port_dev->status_lock)
> in hub_port_connect(), usb_port_resume() and usb_reset_device()
> 
> But patch changed the status_lock and address0_mutex lock order in hub_port_connect().
> Lets see if we can take the status_lock a bit earlier in hub_port_connect() to
> solve this.
> 

I can easily reproduce this myself now.
I'll send a patch on top of this one to fix it.
Lockdep warnings are gone for me after applying it,
Also fixes an unbalanced address0_mutex unlock in error codepath.

Grateful if someone else could try it out as well.

Thanks 
-Mathias

[RFT PATCH] usb: hub: Fix locking issues with address0_mutex

[Mathias Nyman]

Fix the circular lock dependency and unbalanced unlock of addess0_mutex
introduced when fixing an address0_mutex enumeration retry race in commit
ae6dc22d2d1 ("usb: hub: Fix usb enumeration issue due to address0 race")

Make sure locking order between port_dev->status_lock and address0_mutex
is correct, and that address0_mutex is not unlocked in hub_port_connect
"done:" codepath which may be reached without locking address0_mutex

Fixes: 6ae6dc22d2d1 ("usb: hub: Fix usb enumeration issue due to address0 race")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
index 00c3506324e4..00070a8a6507 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
@@ -5188,6 +5188,7 @@ static void hub_port_connect(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1, u16 portstatus,
 	struct usb_port *port_dev = hub->ports[port1 - 1];
 	struct usb_device *udev = port_dev->child;
 	static int unreliable_port = -1;
+	bool retry_locked;
 
 	/* Disconnect any existing devices under this port */
 	if (udev) {
@@ -5244,10 +5245,10 @@ static void hub_port_connect(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1, u16 portstatus,
 
 	status = 0;
 
-	mutex_lock(hcd->address0_mutex);
-
 	for (i = 0; i < PORT_INIT_TRIES; i++) {
-
+		usb_lock_port(port_dev);
+		mutex_lock(hcd->address0_mutex);
+		retry_locked = true;
 		/* reallocate for each attempt, since references
 		 * to the previous one can escape in various ways
 		 */
@@ -5255,6 +5256,8 @@ static void hub_port_connect(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1, u16 portstatus,
 		if (!udev) {
 			dev_err(&port_dev->dev,
 					"couldn't allocate usb_device\n");
+			mutex_unlock(hcd->address0_mutex);
+			usb_unlock_port(port_dev);
 			goto done;
 		}
 
@@ -5276,13 +5279,13 @@ static void hub_port_connect(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1, u16 portstatus,
 		}
 
 		/* reset (non-USB 3.0 devices) and get descriptor */
-		usb_lock_port(port_dev);
 		status = hub_port_init(hub, udev, port1, i);
-		usb_unlock_port(port_dev);
 		if (status < 0)
 			goto loop;
 
 		mutex_unlock(hcd->address0_mutex);
+		usb_unlock_port(port_dev);
+		retry_locked = false;
 
 		if (udev->quirks & USB_QUIRK_DELAY_INIT)
 			msleep(2000);
@@ -5372,11 +5375,14 @@ static void hub_port_connect(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1, u16 portstatus,
 
 loop_disable:
 		hub_port_disable(hub, port1, 1);
-		mutex_lock(hcd->address0_mutex);
 loop:
 		usb_ep0_reinit(udev);
 		release_devnum(udev);
 		hub_free_dev(udev);
+		if (retry_locked) {
+			mutex_unlock(hcd->address0_mutex);
+			usb_unlock_port(port_dev);
+		}
 		usb_put_dev(udev);
 		if ((status == -ENOTCONN) || (status == -ENOTSUPP))
 			break;
@@ -5399,8 +5405,6 @@ static void hub_port_connect(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1, u16 portstatus,
 	}
 
 done:
-	mutex_unlock(hcd->address0_mutex);
-
 	hub_port_disable(hub, port1, 1);
 	if (hcd->driver->relinquish_port && !hub->hdev->parent) {
 		if (status != -ENOTCONN && status != -ENODEV)
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [RFT PATCH] usb: hub: Fix locking issues with address0_mutex

[Marek Szyprowski]

Hi,

On 22.11.2021 11:50, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> Fix the circular lock dependency and unbalanced unlock of addess0_mutex
> introduced when fixing an address0_mutex enumeration retry race in commit
> ae6dc22d2d1 ("usb: hub: Fix usb enumeration issue due to address0 race")
>
> Make sure locking order between port_dev->status_lock and address0_mutex
> is correct, and that address0_mutex is not unlocked in hub_port_connect
> "done:" codepath which may be reached without locking address0_mutex
>
> Fixes: 6ae6dc22d2d1 ("usb: hub: Fix usb enumeration issue due to address0 race")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
This fixes the issue I've reported here: 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/f3bfcbc7-f701-c74a-09bd-6491d4c8d863@samsung.com/
Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> ---
>   drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> index 00c3506324e4..00070a8a6507 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> @@ -5188,6 +5188,7 @@ static void hub_port_connect(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1, u16 portstatus,
>   	struct usb_port *port_dev = hub->ports[port1 - 1];
>   	struct usb_device *udev = port_dev->child;
>   	static int unreliable_port = -1;
> +	bool retry_locked;
>   
>   	/* Disconnect any existing devices under this port */
>   	if (udev) {
> @@ -5244,10 +5245,10 @@ static void hub_port_connect(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1, u16 portstatus,
>   
>   	status = 0;
>   
> -	mutex_lock(hcd->address0_mutex);
> -
>   	for (i = 0; i < PORT_INIT_TRIES; i++) {
> -
> +		usb_lock_port(port_dev);
> +		mutex_lock(hcd->address0_mutex);
> +		retry_locked = true;
>   		/* reallocate for each attempt, since references
>   		 * to the previous one can escape in various ways
>   		 */
> @@ -5255,6 +5256,8 @@ static void hub_port_connect(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1, u16 portstatus,
>   		if (!udev) {
>   			dev_err(&port_dev->dev,
>   					"couldn't allocate usb_device\n");
> +			mutex_unlock(hcd->address0_mutex);
> +			usb_unlock_port(port_dev);
>   			goto done;
>   		}
>   
> @@ -5276,13 +5279,13 @@ static void hub_port_connect(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1, u16 portstatus,
>   		}
>   
>   		/* reset (non-USB 3.0 devices) and get descriptor */
> -		usb_lock_port(port_dev);
>   		status = hub_port_init(hub, udev, port1, i);
> -		usb_unlock_port(port_dev);
>   		if (status < 0)
>   			goto loop;
>   
>   		mutex_unlock(hcd->address0_mutex);
> +		usb_unlock_port(port_dev);
> +		retry_locked = false;
>   
>   		if (udev->quirks & USB_QUIRK_DELAY_INIT)
>   			msleep(2000);
> @@ -5372,11 +5375,14 @@ static void hub_port_connect(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1, u16 portstatus,
>   
>   loop_disable:
>   		hub_port_disable(hub, port1, 1);
> -		mutex_lock(hcd->address0_mutex);
>   loop:
>   		usb_ep0_reinit(udev);
>   		release_devnum(udev);
>   		hub_free_dev(udev);
> +		if (retry_locked) {
> +			mutex_unlock(hcd->address0_mutex);
> +			usb_unlock_port(port_dev);
> +		}
>   		usb_put_dev(udev);
>   		if ((status == -ENOTCONN) || (status == -ENOTSUPP))
>   			break;
> @@ -5399,8 +5405,6 @@ static void hub_port_connect(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1, u16 portstatus,
>   	}
>   
>   done:
> -	mutex_unlock(hcd->address0_mutex);
> -
>   	hub_port_disable(hub, port1, 1);
>   	if (hcd->driver->relinquish_port && !hub->hdev->parent) {
>   		if (status != -ENOTCONN && status != -ENODEV)

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland

Re: [RFT PATCH] usb: hub: Fix locking issues with address0_mutex

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 11/22/21 11:50, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> Fix the circular lock dependency and unbalanced unlock of addess0_mutex
> introduced when fixing an address0_mutex enumeration retry race in commit
> ae6dc22d2d1 ("usb: hub: Fix usb enumeration issue due to address0 race")
> 
> Make sure locking order between port_dev->status_lock and address0_mutex
> is correct, and that address0_mutex is not unlocked in hub_port_connect
> "done:" codepath which may be reached without locking address0_mutex
> 
> Fixes: 6ae6dc22d2d1 ("usb: hub: Fix usb enumeration issue due to address0 race")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>

Oh, this is great, with this patch I can finally hot-plug my
thunderbolt dock (and thus a XHCI controller) without the XHCI
controller given a whole bunch of weird errors (and some USB
devices not working), which it does not when already connected at boot.

I also tried the hotplug thingy with the previous fix without
this locking fix and then I actually hit the deadlock and things
like lsusb would hang.

If we can get these 2 fixes together merged soon and also backported
to the stable series that would be great:

Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>

Regards,

Hans







> ---
>  drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> index 00c3506324e4..00070a8a6507 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> @@ -5188,6 +5188,7 @@ static void hub_port_connect(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1, u16 portstatus,
>  	struct usb_port *port_dev = hub->ports[port1 - 1];
>  	struct usb_device *udev = port_dev->child;
>  	static int unreliable_port = -1;
> +	bool retry_locked;
>  
>  	/* Disconnect any existing devices under this port */
>  	if (udev) {
> @@ -5244,10 +5245,10 @@ static void hub_port_connect(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1, u16 portstatus,
>  
>  	status = 0;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(hcd->address0_mutex);
> -
>  	for (i = 0; i < PORT_INIT_TRIES; i++) {
> -
> +		usb_lock_port(port_dev);
> +		mutex_lock(hcd->address0_mutex);
> +		retry_locked = true;
>  		/* reallocate for each attempt, since references
>  		 * to the previous one can escape in various ways
>  		 */
> @@ -5255,6 +5256,8 @@ static void hub_port_connect(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1, u16 portstatus,
>  		if (!udev) {
>  			dev_err(&port_dev->dev,
>  					"couldn't allocate usb_device\n");
> +			mutex_unlock(hcd->address0_mutex);
> +			usb_unlock_port(port_dev);
>  			goto done;
>  		}
>  
> @@ -5276,13 +5279,13 @@ static void hub_port_connect(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1, u16 portstatus,
>  		}
>  
>  		/* reset (non-USB 3.0 devices) and get descriptor */
> -		usb_lock_port(port_dev);
>  		status = hub_port_init(hub, udev, port1, i);
> -		usb_unlock_port(port_dev);
>  		if (status < 0)
>  			goto loop;
>  
>  		mutex_unlock(hcd->address0_mutex);
> +		usb_unlock_port(port_dev);
> +		retry_locked = false;
>  
>  		if (udev->quirks & USB_QUIRK_DELAY_INIT)
>  			msleep(2000);
> @@ -5372,11 +5375,14 @@ static void hub_port_connect(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1, u16 portstatus,
>  
>  loop_disable:
>  		hub_port_disable(hub, port1, 1);
> -		mutex_lock(hcd->address0_mutex);
>  loop:
>  		usb_ep0_reinit(udev);
>  		release_devnum(udev);
>  		hub_free_dev(udev);
> +		if (retry_locked) {
> +			mutex_unlock(hcd->address0_mutex);
> +			usb_unlock_port(port_dev);
> +		}
>  		usb_put_dev(udev);
>  		if ((status == -ENOTCONN) || (status == -ENOTSUPP))
>  			break;
> @@ -5399,8 +5405,6 @@ static void hub_port_connect(struct usb_hub *hub, int port1, u16 portstatus,
>  	}
>  
>  done:
> -	mutex_unlock(hcd->address0_mutex);
> -
>  	hub_port_disable(hub, port1, 1);
>  	if (hcd->driver->relinquish_port && !hub->hdev->parent) {
>  		if (status != -ENOTCONN && status != -ENODEV)
> 

Re: [RFT PATCH] usb: hub: Fix locking issues with address0_mutex

[Mathias Nyman]

On 22.11.2021 14.27, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 22.11.2021 11:50, Mathias Nyman wrote:
>> Fix the circular lock dependency and unbalanced unlock of addess0_mutex
>> introduced when fixing an address0_mutex enumeration retry race in commit
>> ae6dc22d2d1 ("usb: hub: Fix usb enumeration issue due to address0 race")
>>
>> Make sure locking order between port_dev->status_lock and address0_mutex
>> is correct, and that address0_mutex is not unlocked in hub_port_connect
>> "done:" codepath which may be reached without locking address0_mutex
>>
>> Fixes: 6ae6dc22d2d1 ("usb: hub: Fix usb enumeration issue due to address0 race")
>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
> This fixes the issue I've reported here: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/f3bfcbc7-f701-c74a-09bd-6491d4c8d863@samsung.com/
> Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>

Thank you for testing, I'll add these tags

-Mathias

Re: [RFT PATCH] usb: hub: Fix locking issues with address0_mutex

[Mathias Nyman]

On 22.11.2021 17.41, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 11/22/21 11:50, Mathias Nyman wrote:
>> Fix the circular lock dependency and unbalanced unlock of addess0_mutex
>> introduced when fixing an address0_mutex enumeration retry race in commit
>> ae6dc22d2d1 ("usb: hub: Fix usb enumeration issue due to address0 race")
>>
>> Make sure locking order between port_dev->status_lock and address0_mutex
>> is correct, and that address0_mutex is not unlocked in hub_port_connect
>> "done:" codepath which may be reached without locking address0_mutex
>>
>> Fixes: 6ae6dc22d2d1 ("usb: hub: Fix usb enumeration issue due to address0 race")
>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Oh, this is great, with this patch I can finally hot-plug my
> thunderbolt dock (and thus a XHCI controller) without the XHCI
> controller given a whole bunch of weird errors (and some USB
> devices not working), which it does not when already connected at boot.
> 
> I also tried the hotplug thingy with the previous fix without
> this locking fix and then I actually hit the deadlock and things
> like lsusb would hang.
> 
> If we can get these 2 fixes together merged soon and also backported
> to the stable series that would be great:
> 
> Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Hans
> 

Thanks for testing, I'll add your tags and submit this.

-Mathias