From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen , Andrew Morton , Dave Hansen , Linus Torvalds , Michael Ellermen , Peter Zijlstra , Ram Pai , Shuah Khan , Thomas Gleixner , linux-mm@kvack.org, Ingo Molnar , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.16 237/279] x86/pkeys/selftests: Give better unexpected fault error messages Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 10:13:42 +0200 Message-Id: <20180618080618.608268254@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20180618080608.851973560@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180618080608.851973560@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: 4.16-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Dave Hansen [ Upstream commit 55556b0b2016806b2e16a20b62d143383983a34a ] do_not_expect_pk_fault() is a helper that we call when we do not expect a PK fault to have occurred. But, it is a function, which means that it obscures the line numbers from pkey_assert(). It also gives no details. Replace it with an implementation that gives nice line numbers and also lets callers pass in a more descriptive message about what happened that caused the unexpected fault. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Michael Ellermen Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ram Pai Cc: Shuah Khan Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180509171338.55D13B64@viggo.jf.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c | 13 +++++++------ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c @@ -954,10 +954,11 @@ void expected_pk_fault(int pkey) last_si_pkey = -1; } -void do_not_expect_pk_fault(void) -{ - pkey_assert(last_pkru_faults == pkru_faults); -} +#define do_not_expect_pk_fault(msg) do { \ + if (last_pkru_faults != pkru_faults) \ + dprintf0("unexpected PK fault: %s\n", msg); \ + pkey_assert(last_pkru_faults == pkru_faults); \ +} while (0) int test_fds[10] = { -1 }; int nr_test_fds; @@ -1243,7 +1244,7 @@ void test_ptrace_of_child(int *ptr, u16 pkey_assert(ret != -1); /* Now access from the current task, and expect NO exception: */ peek_result = read_ptr(plain_ptr); - do_not_expect_pk_fault(); + do_not_expect_pk_fault("read plain pointer after ptrace"); ret = ptrace(PTRACE_DETACH, child_pid, ignored, 0); pkey_assert(ret != -1); @@ -1287,7 +1288,7 @@ void test_executing_on_unreadable_memory */ madvise(p1, PAGE_SIZE, MADV_DONTNEED); lots_o_noops_around_write(&scratch); - do_not_expect_pk_fault(); + do_not_expect_pk_fault("executing on PROT_EXEC memory"); ptr_contents = read_ptr(p1); dprintf2("ptr (%p) contents@%d: %x\n", p1, __LINE__, ptr_contents); expected_pk_fault(pkey);