From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Hans de Goede , Alexandre Belloni , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.19 075/110] rtc: cmos: Do not export alarm rtc_ops when we do not support alarms Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 15:12:46 +0100 Message-Id: <20181129135924.281270217@linuxfoundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20181129135921.231283053@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20181129135921.231283053@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-ID: 4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ [ Upstream commit fbb974ba693bbfb4e24a62181ef16d4e45febc37 ] When there is no IRQ configured for the RTC, the rtc-cmos code does not support alarms, all alarm rtc_ops fail with -EIO / -EINVAL. The rtc-core expects a rtc driver which does not support rtc alarms to not have alarm ops at all. Otherwise the wakealarm sysfs attr will read as empty rather then returning an error, making it impossible for userspace to find out beforehand if alarms are supported. A system without an IRQ for the RTC before this patch: [root@localhost ~]# cat /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm [root@localhost ~]# After this patch: [root@localhost ~]# cat /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm cat: /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm: No such file or directory [root@localhost ~]# This fixes gnome-session + systemd trying to use suspend-then-hibernate, which causes systemd to abort the suspend when writing the RTC alarm fails. BugLink: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/9988 Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c | 16 ++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c index df0c5776d49b..a5a19ff10535 100644 --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c @@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ static int cmos_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *t) struct cmos_rtc *cmos = dev_get_drvdata(dev); unsigned char rtc_control; + /* This not only a rtc_op, but also called directly */ if (!is_valid_irq(cmos->irq)) return -EIO; @@ -452,6 +453,7 @@ static int cmos_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *t) unsigned char mon, mday, hrs, min, sec, rtc_control; int ret; + /* This not only a rtc_op, but also called directly */ if (!is_valid_irq(cmos->irq)) return -EIO; @@ -516,9 +518,6 @@ static int cmos_alarm_irq_enable(struct device *dev, unsigned int enabled) struct cmos_rtc *cmos = dev_get_drvdata(dev); unsigned long flags; - if (!is_valid_irq(cmos->irq)) - return -EINVAL; - spin_lock_irqsave(&rtc_lock, flags); if (enabled) @@ -579,6 +578,12 @@ static const struct rtc_class_ops cmos_rtc_ops = { .alarm_irq_enable = cmos_alarm_irq_enable, }; +static const struct rtc_class_ops cmos_rtc_ops_no_alarm = { + .read_time = cmos_read_time, + .set_time = cmos_set_time, + .proc = cmos_procfs, +}; + /*----------------------------------------------------------------*/ /* @@ -855,9 +860,12 @@ cmos_do_probe(struct device *dev, struct resource *ports, int rtc_irq) dev_dbg(dev, "IRQ %d is already in use\n", rtc_irq); goto cleanup1; } + + cmos_rtc.rtc->ops = &cmos_rtc_ops; + } else { + cmos_rtc.rtc->ops = &cmos_rtc_ops_no_alarm; } - cmos_rtc.rtc->ops = &cmos_rtc_ops; cmos_rtc.rtc->nvram_old_abi = true; retval = rtc_register_device(cmos_rtc.rtc); if (retval) -- 2.17.1