From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm/vmalloc: fix size check for remap_vmalloc_range_partial()
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 10:38:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190104093808.GJ31793@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5502b64d6c508f5432386d2cfe999844@suse.de>
On Thu 03-01-19 21:31:58, Roman Penyaev wrote:
> On 2019-01-03 20:40, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Thu 03-01-19 20:27:26, Roman Penyaev wrote:
> > > On 2019-01-03 16:13, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Thu 03-01-19 15:59:52, Roman Penyaev wrote:
> > > > > area->size can include adjacent guard page but get_vm_area_size()
> > > > > returns actual size of the area.
> > > > >
> > > > > This fixes possible kernel crash when userspace tries to map area
> > > > > on 1 page bigger: size check passes but the following
> > > > > vmalloc_to_page()
> > > > > returns NULL on last guard (non-existing) page.
> > > >
> > > > Can this actually happen? I am not really familiar with all the callers
> > > > of this API but VM_NO_GUARD is not really used wildly in the kernel.
> > >
> > > Exactly, by default (VM_NO_GUARD is not set) each area has guard page,
> > > thus the area->size will be bigger. The bug is not reproduced if
> > > VM_NO_GUARD is set.
> > >
> > > > All I can see is kasan na arm64 which doesn't really seem to use it
> > > > for vmalloc.
> > > >
> > > > So is the problem real or this is a mere cleanup?
> > >
> > > This is the real problem, try this hunk for any file descriptor which
> > > provides
> > > mapping, or say modify epoll as example:
> >
> > OK, my response was more confusing than I intended. I meant to say. Is
> > there any in kernel code that would allow the bug have had in mind?
> > In other words can userspace trick any existing code?
>
> In theory any existing caller of remap_vmalloc_range() which does
> not have an explicit size check should trigger an oops, e.g. this is
> a good candidate:
>
> *** drivers/media/usb/stkwebcam/stk-webcam.c:
> v4l_stk_mmap[789] ret = remap_vmalloc_range(vma, sbuf->buffer,
> 0);
Hmm, sbuf->buffer is allocated in stk_setup_siobuf to have
buf->v4lbuf.length. mmap callback maps this buffer to the vma size and
that is indeed not enforced to be <= length AFAICS. So you are right!
Can we have an example in the changelog please?
Thanks!
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-04 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20190103145954.16942-1-rpenyaev@suse.de>
2019-01-03 14:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/vmalloc: fix size check for remap_vmalloc_range_partial() Roman Penyaev
2019-01-03 15:13 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-03 19:27 ` Roman Penyaev
2019-01-03 19:40 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-03 20:31 ` Roman Penyaev
2019-01-04 9:38 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2019-01-04 10:21 ` Roman Penyaev
2019-01-04 10:28 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-03 19:59 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-04 11:06 ` Roman Penyaev
2019-01-11 19:19 ` Andrey Ryabinin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190104093808.GJ31793@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=rpenyaev@suse.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).