From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B04C43387 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 14:26:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F5D20874 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 14:26:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1547216815; bh=MgTA/ZMwPfMdGyRr7NNitxYGAq2t32DnGsw5MblMOMs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=bzK47uU1ZrzQAqh4nC54BVIcmWGwq/brMMuEVgzh8mtHByUFCW89MPCrIAhmjyPUT Dei3UQPYWYRxwPTc3Hw3TENnlyI9wzMwEWyRohPBRuO57SCLdcXVZZpd7/Qh8vIkkm uigp06YT7XuXV4nA1panGl1TcAZpRzqFbD3TFs8E= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731108AbfAKORf (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2019 09:17:35 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:33968 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387872AbfAKORe (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2019 09:17:34 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7321521783; Fri, 11 Jan 2019 14:17:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1547216254; bh=MgTA/ZMwPfMdGyRr7NNitxYGAq2t32DnGsw5MblMOMs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=tvFBoRz4tsoRfKcuoy8gj8yGD9rN5a18I/Rvut2+/aEC/fCue6zm20NEvTBtVYVEr bi3CpAiqFpaZ6nO4cZDjJ91MBYEqAPbIQm3BLuUgTpUpAkwScCxsi/yRyDH6Uvjww9 9A8e0NtZCmTHaEAJaIQKUVBUHqTiHaiTXxenCa/0= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , Takashi Iwai Subject: [PATCH 4.4 31/88] ALSA: emu10k1: Fix potential Spectre v1 vulnerabilities Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 15:08:00 +0100 Message-Id: <20190111131050.653863390@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190111131045.137499039@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20190111131045.137499039@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Gustavo A. R. Silva commit 5ae4f61f012a097df93de2285070ec8e34716d29 upstream. ipcm->substream is indirectly controlled by user-space, hence leading to a potential exploitation of the Spectre variant 1 vulnerability. This issue was detected with the help of Smatch: sound/pci/emu10k1/emufx.c:1031 snd_emu10k1_ipcm_poke() warn: potential spectre issue 'emu->fx8010.pcm' [r] (local cap) sound/pci/emu10k1/emufx.c:1075 snd_emu10k1_ipcm_peek() warn: potential spectre issue 'emu->fx8010.pcm' [r] (local cap) Fix this by sanitizing ipcm->substream before using it to index emu->fx8010.pcm Notice that given that speculation windows are large, the policy is to kill the speculation on the first load and not worry if it can be completed with a dependent load/store [1]. [1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=152449131114778&w=2 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- sound/pci/emu10k1/emufx.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) --- a/sound/pci/emu10k1/emufx.c +++ b/sound/pci/emu10k1/emufx.c @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -1000,6 +1001,8 @@ static int snd_emu10k1_ipcm_poke(struct if (ipcm->substream >= EMU10K1_FX8010_PCM_COUNT) return -EINVAL; + ipcm->substream = array_index_nospec(ipcm->substream, + EMU10K1_FX8010_PCM_COUNT); if (ipcm->channels > 32) return -EINVAL; pcm = &emu->fx8010.pcm[ipcm->substream]; @@ -1046,6 +1049,8 @@ static int snd_emu10k1_ipcm_peek(struct if (ipcm->substream >= EMU10K1_FX8010_PCM_COUNT) return -EINVAL; + ipcm->substream = array_index_nospec(ipcm->substream, + EMU10K1_FX8010_PCM_COUNT); pcm = &emu->fx8010.pcm[ipcm->substream]; mutex_lock(&emu->fx8010.lock); spin_lock_irq(&emu->reg_lock);