From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Avi Kivity <avi@scylladb.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] aio: Fix locking in aio_poll()
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 09:45:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190204174555.83603-1-bvanassche@acm.org> (raw)
Since kioctx.ctx_lock may be acquired from IRQ context, all code that
acquires that lock from thread context must disable interrupts. This
patch fixes the following lockdep complaint:
=====================================================
WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
5.0.0-rc4-next-20190131 #23 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
syz-executor2/13779 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
0000000098ac1230 (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline]
0000000098ac1230 (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1772 [inline]
0000000098ac1230 (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: __io_submit_one fs/aio.c:1875 [inline]
0000000098ac1230 (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}, at: io_submit_one+0xedf/0x1cf0 fs/aio.c:1908
and this task is already holding:
000000003c46111c (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:354 [inline]
000000003c46111c (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1771 [inline]
000000003c46111c (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one fs/aio.c:1875 [inline]
000000003c46111c (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: io_submit_one+0xeb6/0x1cf0 fs/aio.c:1908
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} -> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock:
(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}
... which became SOFTIRQ-irq-safe at:
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3826
__raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:128 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irq+0x60/0x80 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:160
spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:354 [inline]
free_ioctx_users+0x2d/0x4a0 fs/aio.c:610
percpu_ref_put_many include/linux/percpu-refcount.h:285 [inline]
percpu_ref_put include/linux/percpu-refcount.h:301 [inline]
percpu_ref_call_confirm_rcu lib/percpu-refcount.c:123 [inline]
percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic_rcu+0x3e7/0x520 lib/percpu-refcount.c:158
__rcu_reclaim kernel/rcu/rcu.h:240 [inline]
rcu_do_batch kernel/rcu/tree.c:2486 [inline]
invoke_rcu_callbacks kernel/rcu/tree.c:2799 [inline]
rcu_core+0x928/0x1390 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2780
__do_softirq+0x266/0x95a kernel/softirq.c:292
run_ksoftirqd kernel/softirq.c:654 [inline]
run_ksoftirqd+0x8e/0x110 kernel/softirq.c:646
smpboot_thread_fn+0x6ab/0xa10 kernel/smpboot.c:164
kthread+0x357/0x430 kernel/kthread.c:247
ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:352
to a SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe lock:
(&fiq->waitq){+.+.}
... which became SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe at:
...
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3826
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline]
flush_bg_queue+0x1f3/0x3c0 fs/fuse/dev.c:415
fuse_request_queue_background+0x2d1/0x580 fs/fuse/dev.c:676
fuse_request_send_background+0x58/0x120 fs/fuse/dev.c:687
fuse_send_init fs/fuse/inode.c:989 [inline]
fuse_fill_super+0x13bb/0x1730 fs/fuse/inode.c:1214
mount_nodev+0x68/0x110 fs/super.c:1392
fuse_mount+0x2d/0x40 fs/fuse/inode.c:1239
legacy_get_tree+0xf2/0x200 fs/fs_context.c:590
vfs_get_tree+0x123/0x450 fs/super.c:1481
do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2610 [inline]
do_mount+0x1436/0x2c40 fs/namespace.c:2932
ksys_mount+0xdb/0x150 fs/namespace.c:3148
__do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3162 [inline]
__se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3159 [inline]
__x64_sys_mount+0xbe/0x150 fs/namespace.c:3159
do_syscall_64+0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&fiq->waitq);
local_irq_disable();
lock(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock);
lock(&fiq->waitq);
<Interrupt>
lock(&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by syz-executor2/13779:
#0: 000000003c46111c (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:354 [inline]
#0: 000000003c46111c (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: aio_poll fs/aio.c:1771 [inline]
#0: 000000003c46111c (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: __io_submit_one fs/aio.c:1875 [inline]
#0: 000000003c46111c (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.}, at: io_submit_one+0xeb6/0x1cf0 fs/aio.c:1908
the dependencies between SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock and the holding lock:
-> (&(&ctx->ctx_lock)->rlock){..-.} {
IN-SOFTIRQ-W at:
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3826
__raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:128 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irq+0x60/0x80 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:160
spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:354 [inline]
free_ioctx_users+0x2d/0x4a0 fs/aio.c:610
percpu_ref_put_many include/linux/percpu-refcount.h:285 [inline]
percpu_ref_put include/linux/percpu-refcount.h:301 [inline]
percpu_ref_call_confirm_rcu lib/percpu-refcount.c:123 [inline]
percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic_rcu+0x3e7/0x520 lib/percpu-refcount.c:158
__rcu_reclaim kernel/rcu/rcu.h:240 [inline]
rcu_do_batch kernel/rcu/tree.c:2486 [inline]
invoke_rcu_callbacks kernel/rcu/tree.c:2799 [inline]
rcu_core+0x928/0x1390 kernel/rcu/tree.c:2780
__do_softirq+0x266/0x95a kernel/softirq.c:292
run_ksoftirqd kernel/softirq.c:654 [inline]
run_ksoftirqd+0x8e/0x110 kernel/softirq.c:646
smpboot_thread_fn+0x6ab/0xa10 kernel/smpboot.c:164
kthread+0x357/0x430 kernel/kthread.c:247
ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:352
INITIAL USE at:
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3826
__raw_spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:128 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock_irq+0x60/0x80 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:160
spin_lock_irq include/linux/spinlock.h:354 [inline]
__do_sys_io_cancel fs/aio.c:2052 [inline]
__se_sys_io_cancel fs/aio.c:2035 [inline]
__x64_sys_io_cancel+0xd5/0x5a0 fs/aio.c:2035
do_syscall_64+0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
}
... key at: [<ffffffff8a574140>] __key.52370+0x0/0x40
... acquired at:
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3826
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline]
aio_poll fs/aio.c:1772 [inline]
__io_submit_one fs/aio.c:1875 [inline]
io_submit_one+0xedf/0x1cf0 fs/aio.c:1908
__do_sys_io_submit fs/aio.c:1953 [inline]
__se_sys_io_submit fs/aio.c:1923 [inline]
__x64_sys_io_submit+0x1bd/0x580 fs/aio.c:1923
do_syscall_64+0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
the dependencies between the lock to be acquired
and SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe lock:
-> (&fiq->waitq){+.+.} {
HARDIRQ-ON-W at:
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3826
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline]
flush_bg_queue+0x1f3/0x3c0 fs/fuse/dev.c:415
fuse_request_queue_background+0x2d1/0x580 fs/fuse/dev.c:676
fuse_request_send_background+0x58/0x120 fs/fuse/dev.c:687
fuse_send_init fs/fuse/inode.c:989 [inline]
fuse_fill_super+0x13bb/0x1730 fs/fuse/inode.c:1214
mount_nodev+0x68/0x110 fs/super.c:1392
fuse_mount+0x2d/0x40 fs/fuse/inode.c:1239
legacy_get_tree+0xf2/0x200 fs/fs_context.c:590
vfs_get_tree+0x123/0x450 fs/super.c:1481
do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2610 [inline]
do_mount+0x1436/0x2c40 fs/namespace.c:2932
ksys_mount+0xdb/0x150 fs/namespace.c:3148
__do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3162 [inline]
__se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3159 [inline]
__x64_sys_mount+0xbe/0x150 fs/namespace.c:3159
do_syscall_64+0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
SOFTIRQ-ON-W at:
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3826
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline]
flush_bg_queue+0x1f3/0x3c0 fs/fuse/dev.c:415
fuse_request_queue_background+0x2d1/0x580 fs/fuse/dev.c:676
fuse_request_send_background+0x58/0x120 fs/fuse/dev.c:687
fuse_send_init fs/fuse/inode.c:989 [inline]
fuse_fill_super+0x13bb/0x1730 fs/fuse/inode.c:1214
mount_nodev+0x68/0x110 fs/super.c:1392
fuse_mount+0x2d/0x40 fs/fuse/inode.c:1239
legacy_get_tree+0xf2/0x200 fs/fs_context.c:590
vfs_get_tree+0x123/0x450 fs/super.c:1481
do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2610 [inline]
do_mount+0x1436/0x2c40 fs/namespace.c:2932
ksys_mount+0xdb/0x150 fs/namespace.c:3148
__do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3162 [inline]
__se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3159 [inline]
__x64_sys_mount+0xbe/0x150 fs/namespace.c:3159
do_syscall_64+0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
INITIAL USE at:
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3826
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline]
flush_bg_queue+0x1f3/0x3c0 fs/fuse/dev.c:415
fuse_request_queue_background+0x2d1/0x580 fs/fuse/dev.c:676
fuse_request_send_background+0x58/0x120 fs/fuse/dev.c:687
fuse_send_init fs/fuse/inode.c:989 [inline]
fuse_fill_super+0x13bb/0x1730 fs/fuse/inode.c:1214
mount_nodev+0x68/0x110 fs/super.c:1392
fuse_mount+0x2d/0x40 fs/fuse/inode.c:1239
legacy_get_tree+0xf2/0x200 fs/fs_context.c:590
vfs_get_tree+0x123/0x450 fs/super.c:1481
do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2610 [inline]
do_mount+0x1436/0x2c40 fs/namespace.c:2932
ksys_mount+0xdb/0x150 fs/namespace.c:3148
__do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3162 [inline]
__se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3159 [inline]
__x64_sys_mount+0xbe/0x150 fs/namespace.c:3159
do_syscall_64+0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
}
... key at: [<ffffffff8a60dec0>] __key.43450+0x0/0x40
... acquired at:
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3826
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline]
aio_poll fs/aio.c:1772 [inline]
__io_submit_one fs/aio.c:1875 [inline]
io_submit_one+0xedf/0x1cf0 fs/aio.c:1908
__do_sys_io_submit fs/aio.c:1953 [inline]
__se_sys_io_submit fs/aio.c:1923 [inline]
__x64_sys_io_submit+0x1bd/0x580 fs/aio.c:1923
do_syscall_64+0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 13779 Comm: syz-executor2 Not tainted 5.0.0-rc4-next-20190131 #23
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
dump_stack+0x172/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:113
print_bad_irq_dependency kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1573 [inline]
check_usage.cold+0x60f/0x940 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1605
check_irq_usage kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1650 [inline]
check_prev_add_irq kernel/locking/lockdep_states.h:8 [inline]
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1860 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1968 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2339 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x1f12/0x4790 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3320
lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3826
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline]
aio_poll fs/aio.c:1772 [inline]
__io_submit_one fs/aio.c:1875 [inline]
io_submit_one+0xedf/0x1cf0 fs/aio.c:1908
__do_sys_io_submit fs/aio.c:1953 [inline]
__se_sys_io_submit fs/aio.c:1923 [inline]
__x64_sys_io_submit+0x1bd/0x580 fs/aio.c:1923
do_syscall_64+0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@scylladb.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Fixes: e8693bcfa0b4 ("aio: allow direct aio poll comletions for keyed wakeups") # v4.19
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
---
fs/aio.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/aio.c b/fs/aio.c
index b906ff70c90f..41bb7114678e 100644
--- a/fs/aio.c
+++ b/fs/aio.c
@@ -1688,9 +1688,9 @@ static int aio_poll_wake(struct wait_queue_entry *wait, unsigned mode, int sync,
return 0;
/* try to complete the iocb inline if we can: */
- if (spin_trylock(&iocb->ki_ctx->ctx_lock)) {
+ if (spin_trylock_irq(&iocb->ki_ctx->ctx_lock)) {
list_del(&iocb->ki_list);
- spin_unlock(&iocb->ki_ctx->ctx_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&iocb->ki_ctx->ctx_lock);
list_del_init(&req->wait.entry);
aio_poll_complete(iocb, mask);
--
2.20.1.611.gfbb209baf1-goog
next reply other threads:[~2019-02-04 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-04 17:45 Bart Van Assche [this message]
2019-02-04 17:49 ` [PATCH] aio: Fix locking in aio_poll() Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-05 8:12 ` Miklos Szeredi
2019-02-06 0:53 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-02-06 8:36 ` Miklos Szeredi
2019-02-06 13:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-06 14:31 ` Miklos Szeredi
2019-02-06 13:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-09 0:59 Bart Van Assche
2019-02-12 7:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-02-21 22:28 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-02-22 3:17 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190204174555.83603-1-bvanassche@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=avi@scylladb.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).