From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
amir73il@gmail.com, hch@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] xfs: stable fixes for v4.19.y
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2019 08:29:21 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190208212921.GO14116@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190208060620.GA31898@sasha-vm>
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 01:06:20AM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 08:54:54AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:05:59PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >>On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 09:06:55AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >>>On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 08:54:17AM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> >>>>Kernel stable team,
> >>>>
> >>>>here is a v2 respin of my XFS stable patches for v4.19.y. The only
> >>>>change in this series is adding the upstream commit to the commit log,
> >>>>and I've now also Cc'd stable@vger.kernel.org as well. No other issues
> >>>>were spotted or raised with this series.
> >>>>
> >>>>Reviews, questions, or rants are greatly appreciated.
> >>>
> >>>Test results?
> >>>
> >>>The set of changes look fine themselves, but as always, the proof is
> >>>in the testing...
> >>
> >>Luis noted on v1 that it passes through his oscheck test suite, and I
> >>noted that I haven't seen any regression with the xfstests scripts I
> >>have.
> >>
> >>What sort of data are you looking for beyond "we didn't see a
> >>regression"?
> >
> >Nothing special, just a summary of what was tested so we have some
> >visibility of whether the testing covered the proposed changes
> >sufficiently. i.e. something like:
> >
> > Patchset was run through ltp and the fstests "auto" group
> > with the following configs:
> >
> > - mkfs/mount defaults
> > - -m reflink=1,rmapbt=1
> > - -b size=1k
> > - -m crc=0
> > ....
> >
> > No new regressions were reported.
> >
> >
> >Really, all I'm looking for is a bit more context for the review
> >process - nobody remembers what configs other people test. However,
> >it's important in reviewing a backport to know whether a backport to
> >a fix, say, a bug in the rmap code actually got exercised by the
> >tests on an rmap enabled filesystem...
>
> Sure! Below are the various configs this was run against. There were
> multiple runs over 48+ hours and no regressions from a 4.14.17 baseline
> were observed.
Thanks, Sasha. As an ongoing thing, I reckon a "grep _OPTIONS
<config_files>" (catches both mkfs and mount options) would be
sufficient as a summary of what was tested in the series
decription...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-08 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-04 16:54 [PATCH v2 00/10] xfs: stable fixes for v4.19.y Luis Chamberlain
2019-02-04 16:54 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] xfs: Fix xqmstats offsets in /proc/fs/xfs/xqmstat Luis Chamberlain
2019-02-04 16:54 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] xfs: cancel COW blocks before swapext Luis Chamberlain
2019-02-04 16:54 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] xfs: Fix error code in 'xfs_ioc_getbmap()' Luis Chamberlain
2019-02-04 16:54 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] xfs: fix overflow in xfs_attr3_leaf_verify Luis Chamberlain
2019-02-04 16:54 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] xfs: fix shared extent data corruption due to missing cow reservation Luis Chamberlain
2019-02-04 16:54 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] xfs: fix transient reference count error in xfs_buf_resubmit_failed_buffers Luis Chamberlain
2019-02-04 16:54 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] xfs: delalloc -> unwritten COW fork allocation can go wrong Luis Chamberlain
2019-02-04 16:54 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] fs/xfs: fix f_ffree value for statfs when project quota is set Luis Chamberlain
2019-02-04 16:54 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] xfs: fix PAGE_MASK usage in xfs_free_file_space Luis Chamberlain
2019-02-04 16:54 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] xfs: fix inverted return from xfs_btree_sblock_verify_crc Luis Chamberlain
2019-02-05 6:44 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] xfs: stable fixes for v4.19.y Amir Goldstein
2019-02-05 22:06 ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-06 4:05 ` Sasha Levin
2019-02-06 21:54 ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-08 6:06 ` Sasha Levin
2019-02-08 20:06 ` Luis Chamberlain
2019-02-08 21:29 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2019-02-09 17:53 ` Sasha Levin
2019-02-08 22:17 ` Luis Chamberlain
2019-02-09 21:56 ` Sasha Levin
2019-02-11 19:46 ` Luis Chamberlain
2019-02-08 19:48 ` Luis Chamberlain
2019-02-08 21:32 ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-08 21:50 ` Luis Chamberlain
2019-02-10 22:12 ` Dave Chinner
2019-02-11 20:09 ` Luis Chamberlain
2019-02-10 0:06 ` Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190208212921.GO14116@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).