From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78045C76188 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 03:44:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41BAF2171F for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2019 03:44:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="yKegYub9" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730260AbfGPDom (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jul 2019 23:44:42 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f194.google.com ([209.85.210.194]:33566 "EHLO mail-pf1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730311AbfGPDom (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jul 2019 23:44:42 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f194.google.com with SMTP id g2so8413189pfq.0 for ; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 20:44:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=HAbLIcu7Y20FNSdYESSfYWN0X3RSwMnzsh7JLim98Ng=; b=yKegYub9QM21pRBwJqRi8F7TMNXEId9/ySwc7QINpN5uD4U+n1p44JjV3eA/OqTnvV Fj5JMWC1s6/aaaAIgNxP6aXrqZM2z28G/TuoS/cKOI5fImpiNmGIAABDDxRTi/x8zgSs qDhUk4CmUXpAlWbWemWBVPqNwL8dvuZc0kzNpTWfUOChO/yGROao6ZRDEWTZWQbDe5A1 qby6s15XKz0DYAIEiwMs356UINM7Zqw2pGSHUudVEKGRA2YlB6EEzyxObeyRN49XMeiQ 72LyTwIb8qPvXQogyOtk4zMLcTn2DJPhSaEfl9WwB6R0YHCHfEzy4ozhvn5eHa0kip7m 996w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=HAbLIcu7Y20FNSdYESSfYWN0X3RSwMnzsh7JLim98Ng=; b=hu70ci7VnjXeDZw20cXX/aJfIQvLsWFj5sTQnme6dJTE9JDUqx2wteMFd5uEg3nnvY JPvhnCuBA+LkYbsaMnh3Log5TrkbX70VZ/s0Ji+JsFpfT1o4Y9f9GVPxlMY5HWDNrgfq g9RCQ0WrbZK4NMDFNn3ohs0j4OpVJlmUHv/rRKjNbFunjfpxc4v1ABrPxatkrludqp3m 7GiKP3T4vZpUow8ss+Opu+o1kVluX8RIJLPCGrJn8OLG63rB7TmjNogSPbZGL0FWtPm7 YEEqZ9Ld65VCCc376kLTrplIAW6/hKA4R00H91DaLvP69StOwKJq4vfIPIqL70GJ1Q79 of6g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV9P0bVFbVBJe50dk77VShoPgz51FQqaw3DHpZtwzAaFBBnBVUw RPWoJackTbY5/TKYOTzrcxfBoQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyh2bo4bQr+Uxcy92vuimvnkN7dPco681H2kbg5jPAu33xrMkg0wuu6HD4e5qQkyrKUiJau7A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:fa12:: with SMTP id cm18mr33204852pjb.137.1563248680896; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 20:44:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([122.172.28.117]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u16sm19716809pjb.2.2019.07.15.20.44.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Jul 2019 20:44:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 09:14:37 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Mark Rutland Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Julien Thierry , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Catalin Marinas , Marc Zyngier , Will Deacon , Russell King , Vincent Guittot , mark.brown@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4.4 V2 00/43] V4.4 backport of arm64 Spectre patches Message-ID: <20190716034437.gq4q4bsftfzqd2ll@vireshk-i7> References: <20190715130936.GH56232@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190715130936.GH56232@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52 Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On 15-07-19, 14:09, Mark Rutland wrote: > It looks like I messed up spectacularly when backporting that commit; > those files should not have been added. I must have had those lying > around from a rebase or similar. That's what I thought :) > I'll spin a patch for v4.9.y to drop the bits I added erroneously. > > It is somewhat concerning that no-one spotted that (myself included) > when the v4.9.y backport was originally made. :/ Looks like no one reviewed the patches seriously as they came from you and people thought they should be okay. We know Mark :) -- viresh