From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE304C3A5A7 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 16:30:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6935238C5 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 16:30:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1567528254; bh=YUuJLB9+ZbZ+SHPzLepDH1/qbV8uMayU5AvVGuDFpNM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=AQymqweJrJixwjha9B9HTGryHY5uMTr2UOZmxciD1RNHg+SnA8XgRggRB1lPEB68w RWVgzlofECUQzKMXcYdvCrKode6G3PfcOgfj+o/TLdOFueNESWYuXSAzObF3V+ZHOj aTfIAXLdzs/Qs4WuPYd8Wv0U7qEI1d08jZ7hQHzw= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731142AbfICQ2n (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Sep 2019 12:28:43 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:50866 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731145AbfICQ2m (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Sep 2019 12:28:42 -0400 Received: from sasha-vm.mshome.net (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD22523950; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 16:28:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1567528121; bh=YUuJLB9+ZbZ+SHPzLepDH1/qbV8uMayU5AvVGuDFpNM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ViCRrUOgzfUtOdvflZdSvtDQO//pRHGmFZsDFxLqJzDgRQIhNGlwQKg7+WGcHRvST Wo9wQcFlZcP3cViA07wOpRiWOULJuWPs3t6TZEQ5cZR+FurvN2D9drpmota6h66pMd 0XtaEz/2ywG4CE7qM32FKJyf+0D2ePIFLBnEuzlM= From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Filipe Manana , David Sterba , Sasha Levin , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 118/167] Btrfs: fix race between block group removal and block group allocation Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 12:24:30 -0400 Message-Id: <20190903162519.7136-118-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190903162519.7136-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20190903162519.7136-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org From: Filipe Manana [ Upstream commit 8eaf40c0e24e98899a0f3ac9d25a33aafe13822a ] If a task is removing the block group that currently has the highest start offset amongst all existing block groups, there is a short time window where it races with a concurrent block group allocation, resulting in a transaction abort with an error code of EEXIST. The following diagram explains the race in detail: Task A Task B btrfs_remove_block_group(bg offset X) remove_extent_mapping(em offset X) -> removes extent map X from the tree of extent maps (fs_info->mapping_tree), so the next call to find_next_chunk() will return offset X btrfs_alloc_chunk() find_next_chunk() --> returns offset X __btrfs_alloc_chunk(offset X) btrfs_make_block_group() btrfs_create_block_group_cache() --> creates btrfs_block_group_cache object with a key corresponding to the block group item in the extent, the key is: (offset X, BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM_KEY, 1G) --> adds the btrfs_block_group_cache object to the list new_bgs of the transaction handle btrfs_end_transaction(trans handle) __btrfs_end_transaction() btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() --> sees the new btrfs_block_group_cache in the new_bgs list of the transaction handle --> its call to btrfs_insert_item() fails with -EEXIST when attempting to insert the block group item key (offset X, BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM_KEY, 1G) because task A has not removed that key yet --> aborts the running transaction with error -EEXIST btrfs_del_item() -> removes the block group's key from the extent tree, key is (offset X, BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM_KEY, 1G) A sample transaction abort trace: [78912.403537] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [78912.403811] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -17) [78912.404082] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 20465 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:10551 btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x196/0x250 [btrfs] (...) [78912.405642] CPU: 2 PID: 20465 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 5.0.0-btrfs-next-46 #1 [78912.405941] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.11.2-0-gf9626ccb91-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [78912.406586] RIP: 0010:btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x196/0x250 [btrfs] (...) [78912.407636] RSP: 0018:ffff9d3d4b7e3b08 EFLAGS: 00010282 [78912.407997] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff90959a3796f0 RCX: 0000000000000006 [78912.408369] RDX: 0000000000000007 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff909636b16860 [78912.408746] RBP: ffff909626758a58 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [78912.409144] R10: ffff9095ff462400 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff90959a379588 [78912.409521] R13: ffff909626758ab0 R14: ffff9095036c0000 R15: ffff9095299e1158 [78912.409899] FS: 00007f387f16f700(0000) GS:ffff909636b00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [78912.410285] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [78912.410673] CR2: 00007f429fc87cbc CR3: 000000014440a004 CR4: 00000000003606e0 [78912.411095] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [78912.411496] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [78912.411898] Call Trace: [78912.412318] __btrfs_end_transaction+0x5b/0x1c0 [btrfs] [78912.412746] btrfs_inc_block_group_ro+0xcf/0x160 [btrfs] [78912.413179] scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x188/0x5b0 [btrfs] [78912.413622] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x100/0x2a0 [78912.414078] btrfs_scrub_dev+0x2ef/0x720 [btrfs] [78912.414535] ? __sb_start_write+0xd4/0x1c0 [78912.414963] ? mnt_want_write_file+0x24/0x50 [78912.415403] btrfs_ioctl+0x17fb/0x3120 [btrfs] [78912.415832] ? lock_acquire+0xa6/0x190 [78912.416256] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0 [78912.416685] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs] [78912.417116] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa2/0x6f0 [78912.417534] ? __fget+0x113/0x200 [78912.417954] ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80 [78912.418369] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [78912.418812] do_syscall_64+0x60/0x1b0 [78912.419231] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [78912.419644] RIP: 0033:0x7f3880252dd7 (...) [78912.420957] RSP: 002b:00007f387f16ed68 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [78912.421426] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055f5becc1df0 RCX: 00007f3880252dd7 [78912.421889] RDX: 000055f5becc1df0 RSI: 00000000c400941b RDI: 0000000000000003 [78912.422354] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00007f387f16f700 R09: 0000000000000000 [78912.422790] R10: 00007f387f16f700 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 [78912.423202] R13: 00007ffda49c266f R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007f388145e040 [78912.425505] ---[ end trace eb9bfe7c426fc4d3 ]--- Fix this by calling remove_extent_mapping(), at btrfs_remove_block_group(), only at the very end, after removing the block group item key from the extent tree (and removing the free space tree entry if we are using the free space tree feature). Fixes: 04216820fe83d5 ("Btrfs: fix race between fs trimming and block group remove/allocation") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c index 0cc800d22a081..88c939f7aad96 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c @@ -10478,22 +10478,6 @@ int btrfs_remove_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, } spin_unlock(&block_group->lock); - if (remove_em) { - struct extent_map_tree *em_tree; - - em_tree = &fs_info->mapping_tree.map_tree; - write_lock(&em_tree->lock); - /* - * The em might be in the pending_chunks list, so make sure the - * chunk mutex is locked, since remove_extent_mapping() will - * delete us from that list. - */ - remove_extent_mapping(em_tree, em); - write_unlock(&em_tree->lock); - /* once for the tree */ - free_extent_map(em); - } - mutex_unlock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex); ret = remove_block_group_free_space(trans, block_group); @@ -10510,6 +10494,24 @@ int btrfs_remove_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, goto out; ret = btrfs_del_item(trans, root, path); + if (ret) + goto out; + + if (remove_em) { + struct extent_map_tree *em_tree; + + em_tree = &fs_info->mapping_tree.map_tree; + write_lock(&em_tree->lock); + /* + * The em might be in the pending_chunks list, so make sure the + * chunk mutex is locked, since remove_extent_mapping() will + * delete us from that list. + */ + remove_extent_mapping(em_tree, em); + write_unlock(&em_tree->lock); + /* once for the tree */ + free_extent_map(em); + } out: btrfs_free_path(path); return ret; -- 2.20.1