From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB70C4332F for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 12:54:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0927C20693 for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 12:54:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1567947263; bh=6h8UT0E/yYp4objGQC8hRgVp1sgY83CoKIH+u/tnTqI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=N+E7qD/LFEeJ3i3/HTQjStNnYAR+TU9RtVYqfUkHBafn2x6TPY58LEPaOvK7HkPic +cTdUtTZT0Vzzf1Cn3pT41sZD5yd1FwcnhGgeMy+WWvx1xn72ReL8A00y9iVtkm0Jy /jfuBIRTZMFLrh/6dASFtnUG/P/fIVlhRvXW+5VE= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1733189AbfIHMyT (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Sep 2019 08:54:19 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:44562 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732994AbfIHMwW (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Sep 2019 08:52:22 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [62.28.240.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C81821924; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 12:52:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1567947141; bh=6h8UT0E/yYp4objGQC8hRgVp1sgY83CoKIH+u/tnTqI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=lBsqlfO7xafO//0h85uzx4vDRAcM0EqN5pH1uzyUD7ah9Zk4qum19ihQMF9OL1glz gSoURqFjtPbmMtf6M7h+Ym46KbgTI0w+iaXCwXUTgjXDRrgNSKRuUSQ6Wvdxj6HxdR W4J8bxe+HQi6vERhlJo4UdqbGAogCGlY3txtSCD4= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.2 77/94] selftests: kvm: fix state save/load on processors without XSAVE Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 13:42:13 +0100 Message-Id: <20190908121152.641769775@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0 In-Reply-To: <20190908121150.420989666@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20190908121150.420989666@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org [ Upstream commit 54577e5018a8c0cb79c9a0fa118a55c68715d398 ] state_test and smm_test are failing on older processors that do not have xcr0. This is because on those processor KVM does provide support for KVM_GET/SET_XSAVE (to avoid having to rely on the older KVM_GET/SET_FPU) but not for KVM_GET/SET_XCRS. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- .../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c | 16 ++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c index d2ad85fb01ac0..5f1ba3da2dbd3 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c @@ -1059,9 +1059,11 @@ struct kvm_x86_state *vcpu_save_state(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid) TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_XSAVE, r: %i", r); - r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_GET_XCRS, &state->xcrs); - TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_XCRS, r: %i", - r); + if (kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_XCRS)) { + r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_GET_XCRS, &state->xcrs); + TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_XCRS, r: %i", + r); + } r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_GET_SREGS, &state->sregs); TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_SREGS, r: %i", @@ -1102,9 +1104,11 @@ void vcpu_load_state(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid, struct kvm_x86_state *s TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_SET_XSAVE, r: %i", r); - r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_SET_XCRS, &state->xcrs); - TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_SET_XCRS, r: %i", - r); + if (kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_XCRS)) { + r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_SET_XCRS, &state->xcrs); + TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_SET_XCRS, r: %i", + r); + } r = ioctl(vcpu->fd, KVM_SET_SREGS, &state->sregs); TEST_ASSERT(r == 0, "Unexpected result from KVM_SET_SREGS, r: %i", -- 2.20.1