From: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com> As David reported [1], ENODATA returns when attempting to modify files by using EROFS as a overlayfs lower layer. The root cause is that listxattr could return unexpected -ENODATA by mistake for inodes without xattr. That breaks listxattr return value convention and it can cause copy up failure when used with overlayfs. Resolve by zeroing out if no xattr is found for listxattr. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAEvUa7nxnby+rxK-KRMA46=exeOMApkDMAV08AjMkkPnTPV4CQ@mail.gmail.com Fixes: cadf1ccf1b00 ("staging: erofs: add error handling for xattr submodule") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com> --- fs/erofs/xattr.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/erofs/xattr.c b/fs/erofs/xattr.c index a13a78725c57..b766c3ee5fa8 100644 --- a/fs/erofs/xattr.c +++ b/fs/erofs/xattr.c @@ -649,6 +649,8 @@ ssize_t erofs_listxattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct listxattr_iter it; ret = init_inode_xattrs(d_inode(dentry)); + if (ret == -ENOATTR) + return 0; if (ret) return ret; -- 2.20.1
Hi Sasha, On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 10:13:11PM +0000, Sasha Levin wrote: > Hi, > > [This is an automated email] > > This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag, > fixing commit: cadf1ccf1b00 ("staging: erofs: add error handling for xattr submodule"). > > The bot has tested the following trees: v5.4.1, v5.3.14, v4.19.87. > > v5.4.1: Build OK! > v5.3.14: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: > Unable to calculate > > v4.19.87: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: > Unable to calculate Because of file movement, I'll backport manually then. Thanks, Gao Xiang > > > NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream. > > How should we proceed with this patch? > > -- > Thanks, > Sasha
On 2019/12/1 16:40, Gao Xiang wrote:
> From: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
>
> As David reported [1], ENODATA returns when attempting
> to modify files by using EROFS as a overlayfs lower layer.
>
> The root cause is that listxattr could return unexpected
> -ENODATA by mistake for inodes without xattr. That breaks
> listxattr return value convention and it can cause copy
> up failure when used with overlayfs.
>
> Resolve by zeroing out if no xattr is found for listxattr.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAEvUa7nxnby+rxK-KRMA46=exeOMApkDMAV08AjMkkPnTPV4CQ@mail.gmail.com
> Fixes: cadf1ccf1b00 ("staging: erofs: add error handling for xattr submodule")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.19+
> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Thanks,