From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5173C2BA83 for ; Sun, 9 Feb 2020 18:13:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A5112081E for ; Sun, 9 Feb 2020 18:13:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1581272032; bh=PIc1GhBwod0iAueVIQMABnvvYhdDYxJVRZ6Ysyc7I74=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=ATGhsh9W6Ov1LdAA2iA0OG2PBvyvgth8DnhIbiiBd7cxAD4G5EmS5lRbB137ahAmx Ybja/NS5Lmqd2SN5nkzrU4HpPD7kfCOXS0nrf8CKLNGnZshl0hG6RlL+BqU17H65qa FXEN+RCHTRDYuy1XaFVmeHO3Bt6i2ifSDAJR0Xu8= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727413AbgBISNw (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Feb 2020 13:13:52 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:51932 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727408AbgBISNw (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Feb 2020 13:13:52 -0500 Received: from localhost (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5DF2220715; Sun, 9 Feb 2020 18:13:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1581272031; bh=PIc1GhBwod0iAueVIQMABnvvYhdDYxJVRZ6Ysyc7I74=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=cH+eRemuZ/hwiHeVMVCnizd+gF6+I1sNkSUuEA3Zbo1ToW8cHSNmi3NB50jLV13uc /c4mPY/Cys6QDGucRFo9SBbxnGQWzuYal92mdM6qyul3ztzOcjBXQqnV5a3Tjh0sYQ 1izVGXiLOCbVEI1MoP1ts1Tu33jduD06C97QU7sg= Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2020 13:13:50 -0500 From: Sasha Levin To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl, mchehab+huawei@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] media: cec: CEC 2.0-only bcast messages were ignored" failed to apply to 5.5-stable tree Message-ID: <20200209181350.GL3584@sasha-vm> References: <1581248809208186@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1581248809208186@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 12:46:49PM +0100, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > >The patch below does not apply to the 5.5-stable tree. >If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm >tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit >id to . > >thanks, > >greg k-h > >------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ > >>From 01d4fb115470e9f88a58975fe157a9e8b214dfe5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Hans Verkuil >Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 08:52:08 +0100 >Subject: [PATCH] media: cec: CEC 2.0-only bcast messages were ignored > >Some messages are allowed to be a broadcast message in CEC 2.0 >only, and should be ignored by CEC 1.4 devices. > >Unfortunately, the check was wrong, causing such messages to be >marked as invalid under CEC 2.0. > >Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil >Cc: # for v4.10 and up >Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Looks like we somehow ended up with duplicate commits upstream: cec935ce69fc ("media: cec: CEC 2.0-only bcast messages were ignored") 01d4fb115470 ("media: cec: CEC 2.0-only bcast messages were ignored") cec935ce69fc is already queued for all relevant trees, so nothing to do here. -- Thanks, Sasha