From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F636C2BA83 for ; Sun, 9 Feb 2020 20:32:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6742080C for ; Sun, 9 Feb 2020 20:32:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1581280362; bh=P/v7SK5fSzdNNM7h+0uqrnw/0mggqkG3IsZ47tZyNPU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=dfijwR1LMLQvEt9mR/HEX82fbyEny+CeyikGvyO5wcnu29fdDucSe3WdPZrQBLOIu Pc/mKsZQ2CTTT0YaoTIO2pdw+inly7JO+4TeL8aQb0dqn8N/+UGznGfxiCuo/nGWNK BVkDZdyzuttsCBtMwn3pwo2ZRNpRf//n5PvXDwSM= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727404AbgBIUcm (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Feb 2020 15:32:42 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:42268 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727409AbgBIUcm (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Feb 2020 15:32:42 -0500 Received: from localhost (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B29A207FF; Sun, 9 Feb 2020 20:32:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1581280361; bh=P/v7SK5fSzdNNM7h+0uqrnw/0mggqkG3IsZ47tZyNPU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=JjMqnWSocfuY09K62EXup8CrKqH9m8SE6y/hUrXeWWVMU9wkgYax654HMGLCvX0xQ /AtbumIuJil/Y8GHaStCgerBKDtuwfDZalAl9BrkuB7lkjSm43mWB3oewTZjFijJE6 JWeL88c8JLLXHQPwuLFwB8NmSLTDSmJtkSTureag= Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2020 15:32:40 -0500 From: Sasha Levin To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: linmiaohe@huawei.com, liran.alon@oracle.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, sean.j.christopherson@intel.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: nVMX: vmread should not set rflags to specify success in" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree Message-ID: <20200209203240.GC3584@sasha-vm> References: <158125178414544@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <158125178414544@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 01:36:24PM +0100, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > >The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. >If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm >tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit >id to . > >thanks, > >greg k-h > >------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ > >>From a4d956b9390418623ae5d07933e2679c68b6f83c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >From: Miaohe Lin >Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2019 14:25:24 +0800 >Subject: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: vmread should not set rflags to specify success in > case of #PF > >In case writing to vmread destination operand result in a #PF, vmread >should not call nested_vmx_succeed() to set rflags to specify success. >Similar to as done in VMPTRST (See handle_vmptrst()). > >Reviewed-by: Liran Alon >Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin >Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org >Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson >Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini Conflict because of missing c90f4d03cce1 ("kvm: nVMX: Aesthetic cleanup of handle_vmread and handle_vmwrite") on older kernels. Cleaned up and queued for 5.4-4.4. -- Thanks, Sasha