From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821C7C35242 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 18:47:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DAE4214DB for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 18:47:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelfernandes.org header.i=@joelfernandes.org header.b="hpCIi6+1" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729508AbgBKSr5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:47:57 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-f66.google.com ([209.85.219.66]:40168 "EHLO mail-qv1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727958AbgBKSr4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:47:56 -0500 Received: by mail-qv1-f66.google.com with SMTP id dp13so5476006qvb.7 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 10:47:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelfernandes.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=WW6skYTkWTR1YRkvvQUrNrT8hjiq0jQHnJpZVkMjaaQ=; b=hpCIi6+1ayP+tW2keaENP2APYj2FgrMZs5NVPprFOi/KWNw3+iHpZznL6c4BKJS922 QZTVndXoo2l4xwVYHZP/hZjd39pQ88POjJzpBdcJW24MO2ZbCyR+e8+lcyyOoVb/Ja42 DQ4yp3DT+vmCNBRzO8/kmw99D6rXNF4LITIwo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=WW6skYTkWTR1YRkvvQUrNrT8hjiq0jQHnJpZVkMjaaQ=; b=EGiqcrtWVCCeH1S2ctTtrBG70zdtCF7kt7LokpSEFVK8+kMHZz/FNu9vU7hxdXm46D IwEqECF4QJdpkuy8btDtRyy9S296GPKHpmcR/LuKK9BxxQcdQ6WjA+MFkKozWQBRXn9a 3ozcXQaCouvS7rgxGKyIY74YcBpSOtsJpug8wDmHFrRcqQ2vYWllfpYKgWxj1/0PntQu GQEASL/H5T+Qyd9aRoiGqNhbzUBWJTV5tEV4MKthg4HbW330YK8wI9v4aocXc7XSKiCa ffObaamKNpLQVBTv42P0wgnR6hIvI1ThGdBNONJPp5hsbkmdplV/HXwcivI0cztzwEkC Sf9g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUCp9D1yUyRYm44/F1srgamPT9opuxHa+Nf3J9LUFgEw7T4/n3Y r1lFRWKvtXASWoWX3pPmbCVJTQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxuKhGzwecOKVakvuorhqFT/Msgz+GyKOBCyFJL/qjlp+QOBsZ+S9qe87XSTYwmivq7/TLuPw== X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4a14:: with SMTP id m20mr4226356qvz.100.1581446875885; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 10:47:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2620:15c:6:12:9c46:e0da:efbf:69cc]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m95sm2586112qte.41.2020.02.11.10.47.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 11 Feb 2020 10:47:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:47:51 -0500 From: Joel Fernandes To: Sasha Levin Cc: Amol Grover , LKML , Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable , "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.5 150/367] tracing: Annotate ftrace_graph_hash pointer with __rcu Message-ID: <20200211184751.GB250925@google.com> References: <20200210122423.695146547@linuxfoundation.org> <20200210122438.674498788@linuxfoundation.org> <20200211012638.GB13097@sasha-vm> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200211012638.GB13097@sasha-vm> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 08:26:38PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 06:36:20AM -0800, Joel Fernandes wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 4:40 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman > > wrote: > > > > > > From: Amol Grover > > > > > > [ Upstream commit 24a9729f831462b1d9d61dc85ecc91c59037243f ] > > > > Amol, can you send a follow-up patch to annotate > > ftrace_graph_notrace_hash as well? > > Note that I took this to make later stable tagged patch apply cleanly. I > don't expect these annotation changes to be picked up for stable on > their own. Yes, that should be fine. thanks, - Joel