From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39782C433DF for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 17:35:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 116D320659 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 17:35:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1591032916; bh=3Xa7v/coTPQrNojYjRHuxUHB6ARk8xQWc8TrQbAQ1Mw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=HrFQDJAFgAO8fS+851BQkJd1YpCPjSU7xE8Bue4hF7t9SUEjbdnLIFThmnzFA6jf3 c3WFKtz3ddKjcWJuzVk2etB1gDA8bA2EYAjicWMH+05e/s6jx7ezr/xVUEVXUuH4vP 7mcQIt9Hi2klzrr9N0rAsRBXvr3f7AAlg7sT56Is= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726110AbgFARfP (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jun 2020 13:35:15 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:56532 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726017AbgFARfP (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Jun 2020 13:35:15 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75ACF205CB; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 17:35:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1591032914; bh=3Xa7v/coTPQrNojYjRHuxUHB6ARk8xQWc8TrQbAQ1Mw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=OSlT3qi0EPGpn+9UDtGyel66Mxl2K7MNu+Kn+l196QVEY50FweBQr2ASsh9Odz4n8 QJh/sAOmAwwI2jO6A5eAMrmamkqqjM1PGzMMd9FVd7nTuYOcfJTy6gq+rJVRRCv8p9 q1d3qR0mZoj+RMT9h9BD+glc2BAipD3mY5S8UJ2I= Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 19:35:10 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin Cc: Naresh Kamboju , Sasha Levin , linux- stable , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org Subject: Re: stable-rc 4.9: arm: arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S:158: Error: bad instruction `ldcleq p11,cr0,[r10],#32*4' Message-ID: <20200601173510.GA1262785@kroah.com> References: <20200601170248.GA1105493@kroah.com> <20200601170751.GO1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200601172135.GA1236358@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200601172135.GA1236358@kroah.com> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 07:21:35PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 06:07:51PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 07:02:48PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 09:18:34PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > > > stable-rc 4.9 arm architecture build failed due to > > > > following errors, > > > > > > > > # make -sk KBUILD_BUILD_USER=TuxBuild -C/linux -j16 ARCH=arm > > > > CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf- HOSTCC=gcc CC="sccache > > > > arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc" O=build zImage > > > > # > > > > ../arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S: Assembler messages: > > > > ../arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S:158: Error: bad instruction `ldcleq p11,cr0,[r10],#32*4' > > > > ../arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S:233: Error: bad instruction `stcleq p11,cr0,[r0],#32*4' > > > > make[2]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:404: arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.o] Error 1 > > > > make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors. > > > > make[1]: *** [/linux/Makefile:1040: arch/arm/vfp] Error 2 > > > > ../arch/arm/lib/changebit.S: Assembler messages: > > > > ../arch/arm/lib/changebit.S:15: Error: bad instruction `strbne r1,[ip]' > > > > It looks like Naresh's toolchain doesn't like the new format > > instructions. Which toolchain (and versions of the individual > > tools) are you (Naresh) using? > > > > > Odd, I'll drop it from 4.9, but it's also in the 4.14 and 4.19 queues as > > > well, is it causing issues there too? > > > > What if it turns out that Naresh is using an ancient toolchain > > that isn't supported by these kernels? Does that still count as > > a reason to drop the patch? > > Depends on if anyone actually wants to use the newer toolchain on the > really-old 4.9 release :) Ok, looks like other patches in the queue depended on this one, so I've added it back, and we can figure out what Naresh's toolchain is here... thanks, greg k-h