From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C455C433E2 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 14:38:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535D5206B5 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 14:38:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1600180685; bh=gcI9M0cKFhQZxep1ek1FT+mVnZX+a0Y8DyH3bsT0iBw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=dB80QuCh1Hb00is59cKFwnPaMgvopbPV0BMDaqpjBMPaqyb1atMGAWSSIudexXwg1 kQqcImZuD7iW4YCkUYhSA0yXrEfnxNWmA1cwDPqiTcePQnL0+pLmNCgzfzbcgFTg6h TJ1qWWwpFo3PeXZcudKvBKmOiTZ5K2fRYcEok2MM= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727199AbgIOOh6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:37:58 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:48028 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727104AbgIOOhi (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:37:38 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-74-64.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.74.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D2D9A23C3F; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 14:27:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1600180030; bh=gcI9M0cKFhQZxep1ek1FT+mVnZX+a0Y8DyH3bsT0iBw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=WSSZVl8+QYh25IShnfizRfR4EZwNNZMZdHtx/V2pecgC4BFUWj5SUpoHmFMy6r56S ODYC4Ld/FcBHrrU3VzAimofh67S9LylmpO6ta4Q3fNtBMdPtUqUU+U56Pk9w4EYQno jhiFUX7grLJOCTddBssJD68wcSe/om4rTPkaY5/s= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Vineet Gupta , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.8 080/177] ARC: show_regs: fix r12 printing and simplify Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 16:12:31 +0200 Message-Id: <20200915140657.476262699@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.28.0 In-Reply-To: <20200915140653.610388773@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20200915140653.610388773@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org From: Vineet Gupta [ Upstream commit e5c388b4b967037a0e00b60194b0dbcf94881a9b ] when working on ARC64, spotted an issue in ARCv2 reg file printing. print_reg_file() assumes contiguous reg-file whereas in ARCv2 they are not: r12 comes before r0-r11 due to hardware auto-save. Apparently this issue has been present since v2 port submission. To avoid bolting hacks for this discontinuity while looping through pt_regs, just ditching the loop and print pt_regs directly. Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- arch/arc/kernel/troubleshoot.c | 77 +++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arc/kernel/troubleshoot.c b/arch/arc/kernel/troubleshoot.c index 28e8bf04b253f..a331bb5d8319f 100644 --- a/arch/arc/kernel/troubleshoot.c +++ b/arch/arc/kernel/troubleshoot.c @@ -18,44 +18,37 @@ #define ARC_PATH_MAX 256 -/* - * Common routine to print scratch regs (r0-r12) or callee regs (r13-r25) - * -Prints 3 regs per line and a CR. - * -To continue, callee regs right after scratch, special handling of CR - */ -static noinline void print_reg_file(long *reg_rev, int start_num) +static noinline void print_regs_scratch(struct pt_regs *regs) { - unsigned int i; - char buf[512]; - int n = 0, len = sizeof(buf); - - for (i = start_num; i < start_num + 13; i++) { - n += scnprintf(buf + n, len - n, "r%02u: 0x%08lx\t", - i, (unsigned long)*reg_rev); - - if (((i + 1) % 3) == 0) - n += scnprintf(buf + n, len - n, "\n"); - - /* because pt_regs has regs reversed: r12..r0, r25..r13 */ - if (is_isa_arcv2() && start_num == 0) - reg_rev++; - else - reg_rev--; - } - - if (start_num != 0) - n += scnprintf(buf + n, len - n, "\n\n"); + pr_cont("BTA: 0x%08lx\n SP: 0x%08lx FP: 0x%08lx BLK: %pS\n", + regs->bta, regs->sp, regs->fp, (void *)regs->blink); + pr_cont("LPS: 0x%08lx\tLPE: 0x%08lx\tLPC: 0x%08lx\n", + regs->lp_start, regs->lp_end, regs->lp_count); - /* To continue printing callee regs on same line as scratch regs */ - if (start_num == 0) - pr_info("%s", buf); - else - pr_cont("%s\n", buf); + pr_info("r00: 0x%08lx\tr01: 0x%08lx\tr02: 0x%08lx\n" \ + "r03: 0x%08lx\tr04: 0x%08lx\tr05: 0x%08lx\n" \ + "r06: 0x%08lx\tr07: 0x%08lx\tr08: 0x%08lx\n" \ + "r09: 0x%08lx\tr10: 0x%08lx\tr11: 0x%08lx\n" \ + "r12: 0x%08lx\t", + regs->r0, regs->r1, regs->r2, + regs->r3, regs->r4, regs->r5, + regs->r6, regs->r7, regs->r8, + regs->r9, regs->r10, regs->r11, + regs->r12); } -static void show_callee_regs(struct callee_regs *cregs) +static void print_regs_callee(struct callee_regs *regs) { - print_reg_file(&(cregs->r13), 13); + pr_cont("r13: 0x%08lx\tr14: 0x%08lx\n" \ + "r15: 0x%08lx\tr16: 0x%08lx\tr17: 0x%08lx\n" \ + "r18: 0x%08lx\tr19: 0x%08lx\tr20: 0x%08lx\n" \ + "r21: 0x%08lx\tr22: 0x%08lx\tr23: 0x%08lx\n" \ + "r24: 0x%08lx\tr25: 0x%08lx\n", + regs->r13, regs->r14, + regs->r15, regs->r16, regs->r17, + regs->r18, regs->r19, regs->r20, + regs->r21, regs->r22, regs->r23, + regs->r24, regs->r25); } static void print_task_path_n_nm(struct task_struct *tsk) @@ -175,7 +168,7 @@ static void show_ecr_verbose(struct pt_regs *regs) void show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs) { struct task_struct *tsk = current; - struct callee_regs *cregs; + struct callee_regs *cregs = (struct callee_regs *)tsk->thread.callee_reg; /* * generic code calls us with preemption disabled, but some calls @@ -204,25 +197,15 @@ void show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs) STS_BIT(regs, A2), STS_BIT(regs, A1), STS_BIT(regs, E2), STS_BIT(regs, E1)); #else - pr_cont(" [%2s%2s%2s%2s]", + pr_cont(" [%2s%2s%2s%2s] ", STS_BIT(regs, IE), (regs->status32 & STATUS_U_MASK) ? "U " : "K ", STS_BIT(regs, DE), STS_BIT(regs, AE)); #endif - pr_cont(" BTA: 0x%08lx\n SP: 0x%08lx FP: 0x%08lx BLK: %pS\n", - regs->bta, regs->sp, regs->fp, (void *)regs->blink); - pr_info("LPS: 0x%08lx\tLPE: 0x%08lx\tLPC: 0x%08lx\n", - regs->lp_start, regs->lp_end, regs->lp_count); - - /* print regs->r0 thru regs->r12 - * Sequential printing was generating horrible code - */ - print_reg_file(&(regs->r0), 0); - /* If Callee regs were saved, display them too */ - cregs = (struct callee_regs *)current->thread.callee_reg; + print_regs_scratch(regs); if (cregs) - show_callee_regs(cregs); + print_regs_callee(cregs); preempt_disable(); } -- 2.25.1