stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] xen/events: don't use chip_data for legacy IRQs
@ 2020-10-05  6:19 Juergen Gross
  2020-10-14  9:31 ` Jürgen Groß
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Juergen Gross @ 2020-10-05  6:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable; +Cc: Juergen Gross, Stefan Bader, Boris Ostrovsky

Since commit c330fb1ddc0a ("XEN uses irqdesc::irq_data_common::handler_data to store a per interrupt XEN data pointer which contains XEN specific information.")
Xen is using the chip_data pointer for storing IRQ specific data. When
running as a HVM domain this can result in problems for legacy IRQs, as
those might use chip_data for their own purposes.

Use a local array for this purpose in case of legacy IRQs, avoiding the
double use.

Fixes: c330fb1ddc0a ("XEN uses irqdesc::irq_data_common::handler_data to store a per interrupt XEN data pointer which contains XEN specific information.")
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Tested-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200930091614.13660-1-jgross@suse.com
---
This is a backport for stable kernel 5.4.y and older
---
 drivers/xen/events/events_base.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
index 55f2b834cf13..e402620b8920 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
@@ -91,6 +91,8 @@ static bool (*pirq_needs_eoi)(unsigned irq);
 /* Xen will never allocate port zero for any purpose. */
 #define VALID_EVTCHN(chn)	((chn) != 0)
 
+static struct irq_info *legacy_info_ptrs[NR_IRQS_LEGACY];
+
 static struct irq_chip xen_dynamic_chip;
 static struct irq_chip xen_percpu_chip;
 static struct irq_chip xen_pirq_chip;
@@ -155,7 +157,18 @@ int get_evtchn_to_irq(unsigned evtchn)
 /* Get info for IRQ */
 struct irq_info *info_for_irq(unsigned irq)
 {
-	return irq_get_chip_data(irq);
+	if (irq < nr_legacy_irqs())
+		return legacy_info_ptrs[irq];
+	else
+		return irq_get_chip_data(irq);
+}
+
+static void set_info_for_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_info *info)
+{
+	if (irq < nr_legacy_irqs())
+		legacy_info_ptrs[irq] = info;
+	else
+		irq_set_chip_data(irq, info);
 }
 
 /* Constructors for packed IRQ information. */
@@ -376,7 +389,7 @@ static void xen_irq_init(unsigned irq)
 	info->type = IRQT_UNBOUND;
 	info->refcnt = -1;
 
-	irq_set_chip_data(irq, info);
+	set_info_for_irq(irq, info);
 
 	list_add_tail(&info->list, &xen_irq_list_head);
 }
@@ -425,14 +438,14 @@ static int __must_check xen_allocate_irq_gsi(unsigned gsi)
 
 static void xen_free_irq(unsigned irq)
 {
-	struct irq_info *info = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
+	struct irq_info *info = info_for_irq(irq);
 
 	if (WARN_ON(!info))
 		return;
 
 	list_del(&info->list);
 
-	irq_set_chip_data(irq, NULL);
+	set_info_for_irq(irq, NULL);
 
 	WARN_ON(info->refcnt > 0);
 
@@ -602,7 +615,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_irq_from_gsi);
 static void __unbind_from_irq(unsigned int irq)
 {
 	int evtchn = evtchn_from_irq(irq);
-	struct irq_info *info = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
+	struct irq_info *info = info_for_irq(irq);
 
 	if (info->refcnt > 0) {
 		info->refcnt--;
@@ -1106,7 +1119,7 @@ int bind_ipi_to_irqhandler(enum ipi_vector ipi,
 
 void unbind_from_irqhandler(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id)
 {
-	struct irq_info *info = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
+	struct irq_info *info = info_for_irq(irq);
 
 	if (WARN_ON(!info))
 		return;
@@ -1140,7 +1153,7 @@ int evtchn_make_refcounted(unsigned int evtchn)
 	if (irq == -1)
 		return -ENOENT;
 
-	info = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
+	info = info_for_irq(irq);
 
 	if (!info)
 		return -ENOENT;
@@ -1168,7 +1181,7 @@ int evtchn_get(unsigned int evtchn)
 	if (irq == -1)
 		goto done;
 
-	info = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
+	info = info_for_irq(irq);
 
 	if (!info)
 		goto done;
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] xen/events: don't use chip_data for legacy IRQs
  2020-10-05  6:19 [PATCH] xen/events: don't use chip_data for legacy IRQs Juergen Gross
@ 2020-10-14  9:31 ` Jürgen Groß
  2020-10-14  9:51   ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jürgen Groß @ 2020-10-14  9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stable; +Cc: Stefan Bader, Boris Ostrovsky

Any reason this has not made it into 5.4.y and older by now?

This patch is fixing a real problem...


Juergen

On 05.10.20 08:19, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Since commit c330fb1ddc0a ("XEN uses irqdesc::irq_data_common::handler_data to store a per interrupt XEN data pointer which contains XEN specific information.")
> Xen is using the chip_data pointer for storing IRQ specific data. When
> running as a HVM domain this can result in problems for legacy IRQs, as
> those might use chip_data for their own purposes.
> 
> Use a local array for this purpose in case of legacy IRQs, avoiding the
> double use.
> 
> Fixes: c330fb1ddc0a ("XEN uses irqdesc::irq_data_common::handler_data to store a per interrupt XEN data pointer which contains XEN specific information.")
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
> Tested-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
> Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200930091614.13660-1-jgross@suse.com
> ---
> This is a backport for stable kernel 5.4.y and older
> ---
>   drivers/xen/events/events_base.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
>   1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> index 55f2b834cf13..e402620b8920 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> @@ -91,6 +91,8 @@ static bool (*pirq_needs_eoi)(unsigned irq);
>   /* Xen will never allocate port zero for any purpose. */
>   #define VALID_EVTCHN(chn)	((chn) != 0)
>   
> +static struct irq_info *legacy_info_ptrs[NR_IRQS_LEGACY];
> +
>   static struct irq_chip xen_dynamic_chip;
>   static struct irq_chip xen_percpu_chip;
>   static struct irq_chip xen_pirq_chip;
> @@ -155,7 +157,18 @@ int get_evtchn_to_irq(unsigned evtchn)
>   /* Get info for IRQ */
>   struct irq_info *info_for_irq(unsigned irq)
>   {
> -	return irq_get_chip_data(irq);
> +	if (irq < nr_legacy_irqs())
> +		return legacy_info_ptrs[irq];
> +	else
> +		return irq_get_chip_data(irq);
> +}
> +
> +static void set_info_for_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_info *info)
> +{
> +	if (irq < nr_legacy_irqs())
> +		legacy_info_ptrs[irq] = info;
> +	else
> +		irq_set_chip_data(irq, info);
>   }
>   
>   /* Constructors for packed IRQ information. */
> @@ -376,7 +389,7 @@ static void xen_irq_init(unsigned irq)
>   	info->type = IRQT_UNBOUND;
>   	info->refcnt = -1;
>   
> -	irq_set_chip_data(irq, info);
> +	set_info_for_irq(irq, info);
>   
>   	list_add_tail(&info->list, &xen_irq_list_head);
>   }
> @@ -425,14 +438,14 @@ static int __must_check xen_allocate_irq_gsi(unsigned gsi)
>   
>   static void xen_free_irq(unsigned irq)
>   {
> -	struct irq_info *info = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
> +	struct irq_info *info = info_for_irq(irq);
>   
>   	if (WARN_ON(!info))
>   		return;
>   
>   	list_del(&info->list);
>   
> -	irq_set_chip_data(irq, NULL);
> +	set_info_for_irq(irq, NULL);
>   
>   	WARN_ON(info->refcnt > 0);
>   
> @@ -602,7 +615,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_irq_from_gsi);
>   static void __unbind_from_irq(unsigned int irq)
>   {
>   	int evtchn = evtchn_from_irq(irq);
> -	struct irq_info *info = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
> +	struct irq_info *info = info_for_irq(irq);
>   
>   	if (info->refcnt > 0) {
>   		info->refcnt--;
> @@ -1106,7 +1119,7 @@ int bind_ipi_to_irqhandler(enum ipi_vector ipi,
>   
>   void unbind_from_irqhandler(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id)
>   {
> -	struct irq_info *info = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
> +	struct irq_info *info = info_for_irq(irq);
>   
>   	if (WARN_ON(!info))
>   		return;
> @@ -1140,7 +1153,7 @@ int evtchn_make_refcounted(unsigned int evtchn)
>   	if (irq == -1)
>   		return -ENOENT;
>   
> -	info = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
> +	info = info_for_irq(irq);
>   
>   	if (!info)
>   		return -ENOENT;
> @@ -1168,7 +1181,7 @@ int evtchn_get(unsigned int evtchn)
>   	if (irq == -1)
>   		goto done;
>   
> -	info = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
> +	info = info_for_irq(irq);
>   
>   	if (!info)
>   		goto done;
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] xen/events: don't use chip_data for legacy IRQs
  2020-10-14  9:31 ` Jürgen Groß
@ 2020-10-14  9:51   ` Greg KH
  2020-10-14 10:44     ` Jürgen Groß
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2020-10-14  9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jürgen Groß; +Cc: stable, Stefan Bader, Boris Ostrovsky

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 11:31:33AM +0200, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> Any reason this has not made it into 5.4.y and older by now?
> 
> This patch is fixing a real problem...

What is the git commit id of this patch in Linus's tree?

thanks,

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] xen/events: don't use chip_data for legacy IRQs
  2020-10-14  9:51   ` Greg KH
@ 2020-10-14 10:44     ` Jürgen Groß
  2020-10-16  8:06       ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jürgen Groß @ 2020-10-14 10:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg KH; +Cc: stable, Stefan Bader, Boris Ostrovsky

On 14.10.20 11:51, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 11:31:33AM +0200, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>> Any reason this has not made it into 5.4.y and older by now?
>>
>> This patch is fixing a real problem...
> 
> What is the git commit id of this patch in Linus's tree?

0891fb39ba67bd7ae023ea0d367297ffff010781


Juergen

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] xen/events: don't use chip_data for legacy IRQs
  2020-10-14 10:44     ` Jürgen Groß
@ 2020-10-16  8:06       ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2020-10-16  8:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jürgen Groß; +Cc: stable, Stefan Bader, Boris Ostrovsky

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 12:44:39PM +0200, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 14.10.20 11:51, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 11:31:33AM +0200, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> > > Any reason this has not made it into 5.4.y and older by now?
> > > 
> > > This patch is fixing a real problem...
> > 
> > What is the git commit id of this patch in Linus's tree?
> 
> 0891fb39ba67bd7ae023ea0d367297ffff010781

Thank you, now queued up.  Always try to remember that next time, as
it's required.

thanks,

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] xen/events: don't use chip_data for legacy IRQs
  2020-09-30  9:16 Juergen Gross
  2020-09-30 12:06 ` Stefan Bader
@ 2020-09-30 13:51 ` boris.ostrovsky
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: boris.ostrovsky @ 2020-09-30 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Juergen Gross, xen-devel, linux-kernel; +Cc: Stefano Stabellini, stable


On 9/30/20 5:16 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Since commit c330fb1ddc0a ("XEN uses irqdesc::irq_data_common::handler_data to store a per interrupt XEN data pointer which contains XEN specific information.")
> Xen is using the chip_data pointer for storing IRQ specific data. When
> running as a HVM domain this can result in problems for legacy IRQs, as
> those might use chip_data for their own purposes.
>
> Use a local array for this purpose in case of legacy IRQs, avoiding the
> double use.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: c330fb1ddc0a ("XEN uses irqdesc::irq_data_common::handler_data to store a per interrupt XEN data pointer which contains XEN specific information.")
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>


Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] xen/events: don't use chip_data for legacy IRQs
  2020-09-30  9:16 Juergen Gross
@ 2020-09-30 12:06 ` Stefan Bader
  2020-09-30 13:51 ` boris.ostrovsky
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Bader @ 2020-09-30 12:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Juergen Gross, xen-devel, linux-kernel
  Cc: Boris Ostrovsky, Stefano Stabellini, stable


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3840 bytes --]

On 30.09.20 11:16, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Since commit c330fb1ddc0a ("XEN uses irqdesc::irq_data_common::handler_data to store a per interrupt XEN data pointer which contains XEN specific information.")
> Xen is using the chip_data pointer for storing IRQ specific data. When
> running as a HVM domain this can result in problems for legacy IRQs, as
> those might use chip_data for their own purposes.
> 
> Use a local array for this purpose in case of legacy IRQs, avoiding the
> double use.
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: c330fb1ddc0a ("XEN uses irqdesc::irq_data_common::handler_data to store a per interrupt XEN data pointer which contains XEN specific information.")
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Tested-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
> ---
>  drivers/xen/events/events_base.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> index 90b8f56fbadb..6f02c18fa65c 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
> @@ -92,6 +92,8 @@ static bool (*pirq_needs_eoi)(unsigned irq);
>  /* Xen will never allocate port zero for any purpose. */
>  #define VALID_EVTCHN(chn)	((chn) != 0)
>  
> +static struct irq_info *legacy_info_ptrs[NR_IRQS_LEGACY];
> +
>  static struct irq_chip xen_dynamic_chip;
>  static struct irq_chip xen_percpu_chip;
>  static struct irq_chip xen_pirq_chip;
> @@ -156,7 +158,18 @@ int get_evtchn_to_irq(evtchn_port_t evtchn)
>  /* Get info for IRQ */
>  struct irq_info *info_for_irq(unsigned irq)
>  {
> -	return irq_get_chip_data(irq);
> +	if (irq < nr_legacy_irqs())
> +		return legacy_info_ptrs[irq];
> +	else
> +		return irq_get_chip_data(irq);
> +}
> +
> +static void set_info_for_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_info *info)
> +{
> +	if (irq < nr_legacy_irqs())
> +		legacy_info_ptrs[irq] = info;
> +	else
> +		irq_set_chip_data(irq, info);
>  }
>  
>  /* Constructors for packed IRQ information. */
> @@ -377,7 +390,7 @@ static void xen_irq_init(unsigned irq)
>  	info->type = IRQT_UNBOUND;
>  	info->refcnt = -1;
>  
> -	irq_set_chip_data(irq, info);
> +	set_info_for_irq(irq, info);
>  
>  	list_add_tail(&info->list, &xen_irq_list_head);
>  }
> @@ -426,14 +439,14 @@ static int __must_check xen_allocate_irq_gsi(unsigned gsi)
>  
>  static void xen_free_irq(unsigned irq)
>  {
> -	struct irq_info *info = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
> +	struct irq_info *info = info_for_irq(irq);
>  
>  	if (WARN_ON(!info))
>  		return;
>  
>  	list_del(&info->list);
>  
> -	irq_set_chip_data(irq, NULL);
> +	set_info_for_irq(irq, NULL);
>  
>  	WARN_ON(info->refcnt > 0);
>  
> @@ -603,7 +616,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_irq_from_gsi);
>  static void __unbind_from_irq(unsigned int irq)
>  {
>  	evtchn_port_t evtchn = evtchn_from_irq(irq);
> -	struct irq_info *info = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
> +	struct irq_info *info = info_for_irq(irq);
>  
>  	if (info->refcnt > 0) {
>  		info->refcnt--;
> @@ -1108,7 +1121,7 @@ int bind_ipi_to_irqhandler(enum ipi_vector ipi,
>  
>  void unbind_from_irqhandler(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id)
>  {
> -	struct irq_info *info = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
> +	struct irq_info *info = info_for_irq(irq);
>  
>  	if (WARN_ON(!info))
>  		return;
> @@ -1142,7 +1155,7 @@ int evtchn_make_refcounted(evtchn_port_t evtchn)
>  	if (irq == -1)
>  		return -ENOENT;
>  
> -	info = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
> +	info = info_for_irq(irq);
>  
>  	if (!info)
>  		return -ENOENT;
> @@ -1170,7 +1183,7 @@ int evtchn_get(evtchn_port_t evtchn)
>  	if (irq == -1)
>  		goto done;
>  
> -	info = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
> +	info = info_for_irq(irq);
>  
>  	if (!info)
>  		goto done;
> 



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] xen/events: don't use chip_data for legacy IRQs
@ 2020-09-30  9:16 Juergen Gross
  2020-09-30 12:06 ` Stefan Bader
  2020-09-30 13:51 ` boris.ostrovsky
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Juergen Gross @ 2020-09-30  9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xen-devel, linux-kernel
  Cc: Juergen Gross, Boris Ostrovsky, Stefano Stabellini, stable

Since commit c330fb1ddc0a ("XEN uses irqdesc::irq_data_common::handler_data to store a per interrupt XEN data pointer which contains XEN specific information.")
Xen is using the chip_data pointer for storing IRQ specific data. When
running as a HVM domain this can result in problems for legacy IRQs, as
those might use chip_data for their own purposes.

Use a local array for this purpose in case of legacy IRQs, avoiding the
double use.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: c330fb1ddc0a ("XEN uses irqdesc::irq_data_common::handler_data to store a per interrupt XEN data pointer which contains XEN specific information.")
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
---
 drivers/xen/events/events_base.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
index 90b8f56fbadb..6f02c18fa65c 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
@@ -92,6 +92,8 @@ static bool (*pirq_needs_eoi)(unsigned irq);
 /* Xen will never allocate port zero for any purpose. */
 #define VALID_EVTCHN(chn)	((chn) != 0)
 
+static struct irq_info *legacy_info_ptrs[NR_IRQS_LEGACY];
+
 static struct irq_chip xen_dynamic_chip;
 static struct irq_chip xen_percpu_chip;
 static struct irq_chip xen_pirq_chip;
@@ -156,7 +158,18 @@ int get_evtchn_to_irq(evtchn_port_t evtchn)
 /* Get info for IRQ */
 struct irq_info *info_for_irq(unsigned irq)
 {
-	return irq_get_chip_data(irq);
+	if (irq < nr_legacy_irqs())
+		return legacy_info_ptrs[irq];
+	else
+		return irq_get_chip_data(irq);
+}
+
+static void set_info_for_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_info *info)
+{
+	if (irq < nr_legacy_irqs())
+		legacy_info_ptrs[irq] = info;
+	else
+		irq_set_chip_data(irq, info);
 }
 
 /* Constructors for packed IRQ information. */
@@ -377,7 +390,7 @@ static void xen_irq_init(unsigned irq)
 	info->type = IRQT_UNBOUND;
 	info->refcnt = -1;
 
-	irq_set_chip_data(irq, info);
+	set_info_for_irq(irq, info);
 
 	list_add_tail(&info->list, &xen_irq_list_head);
 }
@@ -426,14 +439,14 @@ static int __must_check xen_allocate_irq_gsi(unsigned gsi)
 
 static void xen_free_irq(unsigned irq)
 {
-	struct irq_info *info = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
+	struct irq_info *info = info_for_irq(irq);
 
 	if (WARN_ON(!info))
 		return;
 
 	list_del(&info->list);
 
-	irq_set_chip_data(irq, NULL);
+	set_info_for_irq(irq, NULL);
 
 	WARN_ON(info->refcnt > 0);
 
@@ -603,7 +616,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_irq_from_gsi);
 static void __unbind_from_irq(unsigned int irq)
 {
 	evtchn_port_t evtchn = evtchn_from_irq(irq);
-	struct irq_info *info = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
+	struct irq_info *info = info_for_irq(irq);
 
 	if (info->refcnt > 0) {
 		info->refcnt--;
@@ -1108,7 +1121,7 @@ int bind_ipi_to_irqhandler(enum ipi_vector ipi,
 
 void unbind_from_irqhandler(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id)
 {
-	struct irq_info *info = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
+	struct irq_info *info = info_for_irq(irq);
 
 	if (WARN_ON(!info))
 		return;
@@ -1142,7 +1155,7 @@ int evtchn_make_refcounted(evtchn_port_t evtchn)
 	if (irq == -1)
 		return -ENOENT;
 
-	info = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
+	info = info_for_irq(irq);
 
 	if (!info)
 		return -ENOENT;
@@ -1170,7 +1183,7 @@ int evtchn_get(evtchn_port_t evtchn)
 	if (irq == -1)
 		goto done;
 
-	info = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
+	info = info_for_irq(irq);
 
 	if (!info)
 		goto done;
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-10-16  8:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-05  6:19 [PATCH] xen/events: don't use chip_data for legacy IRQs Juergen Gross
2020-10-14  9:31 ` Jürgen Groß
2020-10-14  9:51   ` Greg KH
2020-10-14 10:44     ` Jürgen Groß
2020-10-16  8:06       ` Greg KH
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-09-30  9:16 Juergen Gross
2020-09-30 12:06 ` Stefan Bader
2020-09-30 13:51 ` boris.ostrovsky

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).