From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95D3C433DB for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 15:43:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8800C21D81 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 15:43:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729028AbhAVPno (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2021 10:43:44 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39794 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729032AbhAVPni (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jan 2021 10:43:38 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-x833.google.com (mail-qt1-x833.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::833]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 066A1C06174A; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 07:42:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qt1-x833.google.com with SMTP id z9so4376702qtv.6; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 07:42:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=6dQh4eu6OadVK+LYkdoHUNDrCwpiKoNQBIPdj3Z2wsU=; b=djw84JL/n9DMrCkHSRIyzbIzKi/0jFfjiUmcJUvH2VkUkdkFVAO+047m6crX4gAnkG L5KaIcdhZ5KbFMbh9AsGN3xxbcstK86Z1WWZ9/W2WnSnRUstPray1B6mYhoczg+9cS6G UYFB1cPlZ73j9hLyClV+dLv+Sqdbjxo/zE5kfptCGZ7sn3Gdp5S93W4sWE0Zs03aJyaW AiIbSEjUiQ6VpMtzvn/9W/TJ57S3hIc3fnJLF55X9czaniyvfPCKwPkUBQg7EhTdvhf4 DK8aZgE83uSQ+/Kc0vIk3+JXszBmXI/8hwaldUNgAw24RYdIGGgp0aSR6E1YZeQz+dST E0cw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=6dQh4eu6OadVK+LYkdoHUNDrCwpiKoNQBIPdj3Z2wsU=; b=rfiNhf3WrvC09SX34PBlyznh5WDOHEEwuo3+/cSG6/hdLz5AC9kp0eDipFOBCtE3QV qwRrtNNpfQfQZ7/w0XtHxfSJP2rYGDPjHexQZ5Ak1XjaG1OFIejZoz46B6qeCcAmUqkt q9uocBux1m6iYcEhYMJIdvUYBC4yjjaK6eyNj9PCUVFSn4wgDPdYiaxy+E4qszvfrrxX BRJfzJNUsFBTHIA5JL37kesxeVPx6/Ogbz6UvmQl459ljZvcuNhTOxOEHl1KS/MFsck1 D7/jD9C1HRG6ZfGx+AfAi9x2xq1GQnX77tT/dEuZfFTWOYWvK3pBMaI68H1DqYeQ4UH3 iI7A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532v9G5t1CgVAsANM8QXB/t309KtJYVt6/FvAADtymVCs8LUdAIk btYRaqaBSMzNp6NWNsM4TKo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwxwcoqIGf4Hd+gRO14StcrONSBu6o8bPrBtWtYBfcrU81kGkORjgCwnoUKJkXKxwLPQPOAPg== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4e55:: with SMTP id e21mr4677048qtw.159.1611330169191; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 07:42:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from ubuntu-m3-large-x86 ([2604:1380:45f1:1d00::1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h8sm6161683qtm.5.2021.01.22.07.42.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 22 Jan 2021 07:42:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 08:42:46 -0700 From: Nathan Chancellor To: Will Deacon Cc: Naresh Kamboju , Greg Kroah-Hartman , open list , Shuah Khan , patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, linux-stable , pavel@denx.de, Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Guenter Roeck , clang-built-linux , Russell King , Arnd Bergmann , Nick Desaulniers Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/50] 4.14.217-rc1 review Message-ID: <20210122154246.GA1308786@ubuntu-m3-large-x86> References: <20210122135735.176469491@linuxfoundation.org> <20210122153604.GA24972@willie-the-truck> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210122153604.GA24972@willie-the-truck> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 03:36:04PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 08:43:18PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 at 20:38, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 08:32:46PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > > > On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 at 19:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.217 release. > > > > > There are 50 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > > > let me know. > > > > > > > > > > Responses should be made by Sun, 24 Jan 2021 13:57:23 +0000. > > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.217-rc1.gz > > > > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.14.y > > > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > > > > > arm64 clang-10 builds breaks due to this patch on > > > > - stable-rc 4.14 > > > > - stable-rc 4.9 > > > > - stable-rc 4.4 > > > > > > > > > Will Deacon > > > > > compiler.h: Raise minimum version of GCC to 5.1 for arm64 > > > > > > > > arm64 (defconfig) with clang-10 - FAILED > > > > > > How is a clang build breaking on a "check what version of gcc is being > > > used" change? > > > > > > What is the error message? > > > > make --silent --keep-going --jobs=8 > > O=/home/tuxbuild/.cache/tuxmake/builds/1/tmp ARCH=arm64 > > CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- 'HOSTCC=sccache clang' 'CC=sccache > > clang' > > In file included from :1: > > include/linux/kconfig.h:74: > > include/linux/compiler_types.h:58: > > include/linux/compiler-gcc.h:160:3: error: Sorry, your version of GCC > > is too old - please use 5.1 or newer. > > # error Sorry, your version of GCC is too old - please use 5.1 or newer. > > ^ > > 1 error generated. > > > > build error link: > > https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc/-/jobs/980489003#L514 > > Urgh, looks like we need backports of 815f0ddb346c > ("include/linux/compiler*.h: make compiler-*.h mutually exclusive") then. > > Greg -- please drop my changes from 4.14, 4.9 and 4.4 for now and I'll > look at this next week. That backport is going to be pretty gnarly, there was a pretty decent tailwind of fixes around that patch IIRC. The simple solution would be to stick a !defined(__clang__) in that preprocessor conditional so that it truly fires only for GCC. Cheers, Nathan