From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1FFC433DB for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 20:35:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 731A622510 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 20:35:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732155AbhAYUe6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2021 15:34:58 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36356 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732216AbhAYUSu (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2021 15:18:50 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-x22a.google.com (mail-oi1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A25DFC061756; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 12:18:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oi1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id g69so15356517oib.12; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 12:18:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=T76zXLihM3diqRLtZIwr3s1pIV8slciUw1jl5T7rp2k=; b=K1aG8r0xtnUduoJ378Az/Ll+cK46hNzfniF1kLO/eIfK5oTWlgK29czxbEyQSEWQzv AV7K6OP3yFnq1EAt4zpz+TCEyp9wqpa3qFZS/RuVHDLyAeLfdt7G9QUPIBLIhx12NaHb +cvCzY/XQUg+RBrhOQ93li6C2A76SLGF0cw4fJUpxPYQf79PignF/2Is4dSV0oQJNnxu rpQcsqCFY30Y2b7xgZFWp2zXZ44NzpOZv91Ew57nEg3DMfFuYBpWA7Lpu5cEKrbHmYji ambAVCTnpM+nsMX4rf+CmDy6MFRjrIjg+BnxjlSNp0cL77RRVTySyKjwSq3WUMXUtxOw 8ZGA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=T76zXLihM3diqRLtZIwr3s1pIV8slciUw1jl5T7rp2k=; b=BrsZTAe4MDOtT2V6Dr+MZ+b+A3HzcPyO6nRBkmw8JLQZ8EOdNCB0JGMwWg4oT8iP3n DP3y+DVW7FA2R2yB02Hm6DYeRU2qUHakLYNqHZPbJ2AXZkSOhSfnbaR0c4H7qLA3Qext LmlrNPOMFfQzybmtStgV45WJJPhHBlVsW+qCnOm4cAOEYdBTs4mbURFjhhfw17GZ5rXf A41gOb2IUS9E4s8/1TvoSIcPBhFPgvjQ7UMWOzwQmeJBSk9OymiGBoc1yfDtuV47QYlR Pp2HPcwTxIZzZkIuy0F8LlXNa0zXoybNegB/se26ds1F5pe5/lCSbJIZSjR3QGSAyook z8+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530vjUxwLXb2CSVug7zNcJcLPu+mpQXhne44/ThKwiWuEZFQ25Tl v7505GXH6qgyvZZv7P0ULEU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxJj/WRS/F7K4xGjTWcdjNiBM17xYrsbvcw3PGmWj4pzSUlZ0atmhluxxp1xDNUKEOxGJS+sg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:a09:: with SMTP id n9mr1189205oij.26.1611605889041; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 12:18:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c18sm2225899oov.20.2021.01.25.12.18.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 25 Jan 2021 12:18:08 -0800 (PST) Sender: Guenter Roeck Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 12:18:06 -0800 From: Guenter Roeck To: Daniel =?iso-8859-1?Q?D=EDaz?= Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, pavel@denx.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/199] 5.10.11-rc1 review Message-ID: <20210125201806.GA78651@roeck-us.net> References: <20210125183216.245315437@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 01:36:03PM -0600, Daniel Díaz wrote: > Hello! > > > On 1/25/21 12:37 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.11 release. > > There are 199 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 27 Jan 2021 18:31:44 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.11-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > Sanity results from Linaro’s test farm. > Regressions detected. > [ ... ] > > Errors look like the following: > > make --silent --keep-going --jobs=8 O=/home/tuxbuild/.cache/tuxmake/builds/1/tmp ARCH=x86_64 CROSS_COMPILE=x86_64-linux-gnu- 'CC=sccache x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc' 'HOSTCC=sccache gcc' > /builds/1nZbYji0zW0SkEnWMrDznWWzerI/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c: In function 'bsp_init_amd': > /builds/1nZbYji0zW0SkEnWMrDznWWzerI/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c:572:3: error: '__max_die_per_package' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'topology_max_die_per_package'? > 572 | __max_die_per_package = nodes_per_socket = ((ecx >> 8) & 7) + 1; > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | topology_max_die_per_package > > Will find out more soon. > This may be due to commit 76e2fc63ca40 ("x86/cpu/amd: Set __max_die_per_package on AMD"). Our patches robot tells me: SHA 76e2fc63ca40 recursively fixed by: 1eb8f690bcb5 I don't see commit 1eb8f690bcb5 ("x86/topology: Make __max_die_per_package available unconditionally") in the commit log. I have not checked, but it is at least possible that applying it fixes the problem. Guenter