stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com>
To: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 06/13] bpf: Sanity check max value for var_off stack access
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 18:35:30 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210913153537.2162465-7-ovidiu.panait@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210913153537.2162465-1-ovidiu.panait@windriver.com>

From: Andrey Ignatov <rdna@fb.com>

commit 107c26a70ca81bfc33657366ad69d02fdc9efc9d upstream.

As discussed in [1] max value of variable offset has to be checked for
overflow on stack access otherwise verifier would accept code like this:

  0: (b7) r2 = 6
  1: (b7) r3 = 28
  2: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = 0
  3: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = 0
  4: (79) r4 = *(u64 *)(r1 +168)
  5: (c5) if r4 s< 0x0 goto pc+4
   R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2=inv6 R3=inv28
   R4=inv(id=0,umax_value=9223372036854775807,var_off=(0x0;
   0x7fffffffffffffff)) R10=fp0,call_-1 fp-8=mmmmmmmm fp-16=mmmmmmmm
  6: (17) r4 -= 16
  7: (0f) r4 += r10
  8: (b7) r5 = 8
  9: (85) call bpf_getsockopt#57
  10: (b7) r0 = 0
  11: (95) exit

, where R4 obviosly has unbounded max value.

Fix it by checking that reg->smax_value is inside (-BPF_MAX_VAR_OFF;
BPF_MAX_VAR_OFF) range.

reg->smax_value is used instead of reg->umax_value because stack
pointers are calculated using negative offset from fp. This is opposite
to e.g. map access where offset must be non-negative and where
umax_value is used.

Also dedicated verbose logs are added for both min and max bound check
failures to have diagnostics consistent with variable offset handling in
check_map_access().

[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=155433357510597&w=2

Fixes: 2011fccfb61b ("bpf: Support variable offset stack access from helpers")
Reported-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrey Ignatov <rdna@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index d2f3bbff3175..3168f331258e 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -1833,16 +1833,28 @@ static int check_stack_boundary(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno,
 		if (meta && meta->raw_mode)
 			meta = NULL;
 
+		if (reg->smax_value >= BPF_MAX_VAR_OFF ||
+		    reg->smax_value <= -BPF_MAX_VAR_OFF) {
+			verbose(env, "R%d unbounded indirect variable offset stack access\n",
+				regno);
+			return -EACCES;
+		}
 		min_off = reg->smin_value + reg->off;
-		max_off = reg->umax_value + reg->off;
+		max_off = reg->smax_value + reg->off;
 		err = __check_stack_boundary(env, regno, min_off, access_size,
 					     zero_size_allowed);
-		if (err)
+		if (err) {
+			verbose(env, "R%d min value is outside of stack bound\n",
+				regno);
 			return err;
+		}
 		err = __check_stack_boundary(env, regno, max_off, access_size,
 					     zero_size_allowed);
-		if (err)
+		if (err) {
+			verbose(env, "R%d max value is outside of stack bound\n",
+				regno);
 			return err;
+		}
 	}
 
 	if (meta && meta->raw_mode) {
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-13 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-13 15:35 [PATCH 4.19 00/13] bpf: backport fixes for CVE-2021-34556/CVE-2021-35477 Ovidiu Panait
2021-09-13 15:35 ` [PATCH 4.19 01/13] bpf/verifier: per-register parent pointers Ovidiu Panait
2021-09-13 15:35 ` [PATCH 4.19 02/13] bpf: correct slot_type marking logic to allow more stack slot sharing Ovidiu Panait
2021-09-13 15:35 ` [PATCH 4.19 03/13] bpf: Support variable offset stack access from helpers Ovidiu Panait
2021-09-13 15:35 ` [PATCH 4.19 04/13] bpf: Reject indirect var_off stack access in raw mode Ovidiu Panait
2021-09-13 15:35 ` [PATCH 4.19 05/13] bpf: Reject indirect var_off stack access in unpriv mode Ovidiu Panait
2021-09-13 15:35 ` Ovidiu Panait [this message]
2021-09-13 15:35 ` [PATCH 4.19 07/13] selftests/bpf: Test variable offset stack access Ovidiu Panait
2021-09-13 15:35 ` [PATCH 4.19 08/13] bpf: track spill/fill of constants Ovidiu Panait
2021-09-13 15:35 ` [PATCH 4.19 09/13] selftests/bpf: fix tests due to const spill/fill Ovidiu Panait
2021-09-13 15:35 ` [PATCH 4.19 10/13] bpf: Introduce BPF nospec instruction for mitigating Spectre v4 Ovidiu Panait
2021-09-13 15:35 ` [PATCH 4.19 11/13] bpf: Fix leakage due to insufficient speculative store bypass mitigation Ovidiu Panait
2021-09-13 15:35 ` [PATCH 4.19 12/13] bpf: verifier: Allocate idmap scratch in verifier env Ovidiu Panait
2021-09-13 15:35 ` [PATCH 4.19 13/13] bpf: Fix pointer arithmetic mask tightening under state pruning Ovidiu Panait
2021-09-15 12:39 ` [PATCH 4.19 00/13] bpf: backport fixes for CVE-2021-34556/CVE-2021-35477 Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210913153537.2162465-7-ovidiu.panait@windriver.com \
    --to=ovidiu.panait@windriver.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).