From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13AB3C433FE for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 17:12:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1345944AbiCHRMt (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2022 12:12:49 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39664 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1348647AbiCHRMs (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2022 12:12:48 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FDBF52E65 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 09:11:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1646759511; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6sR1w2DAlgdgmjJFZafHRcgbb/FCK02/HSDWCWSPxHo=; b=AR9FSeJz9KLWyNeFVK87ugQM25eQ3PPqW/B8cC+qNwgzdDh0jHzYKQPzHBefRC/o4MEyBh K4b7E77dm6QZbibetVQ2fRZZmtKrEuNQ686ShnPLCXpCirooQZ2zx4aOpYwtEjhafvmYUO xEbBSK0KhAPvSmCONkPQk+yhG85ERJQ= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-661-3cGUxwmJOkqjE3J5HcxenA-1; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 12:11:50 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 3cGUxwmJOkqjE3J5HcxenA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DDDC8031E1; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 17:11:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hydra.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.192.22]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320C4804D4; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 17:11:47 +0000 (UTC) From: Jocelyn Falempe To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: michel@daenzer.net, lyude@redhat.com, tzimmermann@suse.de, Jocelyn Falempe , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] drm/mgag200: Fix PLL setup for g200wb and g200ew Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 18:11:11 +0100 Message-Id: <20220308171111.220557-1-jfalempe@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org commit f86c3ed55920ca1d874758cc290890902a6cffc4 ("drm/mgag200: Split PLL setup into compute and update functions") introduced a regression for g200wb and g200ew. The PLLs are not set up properly, and VGA screen stays black, or displays "out of range" message. MGA1064_WB_PIX_PLLC_N/M/P was mistakenly replaced with MGA1064_PIX_PLLC_N/M/P which have different addresses. Patch tested on a Dell T310 with g200wb Fixes: f86c3ed55920ca1d874758cc290890902a6cffc4 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jocelyn Falempe --- drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_pll.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_pll.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_pll.c index e9ae22b4f813..52be08b744ad 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_pll.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_pll.c @@ -404,9 +404,9 @@ mgag200_pixpll_update_g200wb(struct mgag200_pll *pixpll, const struct mgag200_pl udelay(50); /* program pixel pll register */ - WREG_DAC(MGA1064_PIX_PLLC_N, xpixpllcn); - WREG_DAC(MGA1064_PIX_PLLC_M, xpixpllcm); - WREG_DAC(MGA1064_PIX_PLLC_P, xpixpllcp); + WREG_DAC(MGA1064_WB_PIX_PLLC_N, xpixpllcn); + WREG_DAC(MGA1064_WB_PIX_PLLC_M, xpixpllcm); + WREG_DAC(MGA1064_WB_PIX_PLLC_P, xpixpllcp); udelay(50); -- 2.35.1